Suppr超能文献

术前实践与教员反馈相结合可能无法提高妇产科住院医师的手术操作表现。

Preoperative Practice Paired With Instructor Feedback May Not Improve Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Operative Performance.

作者信息

Kroft Jamie, Ordon Michael, Po Leslie, Zwingerman Nora, Waters Katie, Lee Jason Y, Pittini Richard

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Apr;9(2):190-194. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00238.1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that preoperative practice prior to surgery can improve trainee performance, but the optimal approach has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if preoperative practice by surgical trainees paired with instructor feedback improved surgical technique, compared to preoperative practice or feedback alone.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of obstetrics-gynecology trainees, stratified on a simulator-assessed surgical skill. Participants were randomized to preoperative practice on a simulator with instructor feedback (PPF), preoperative practice alone (PP), or feedback alone (F). Trainees then completed a laparoscopic salpingectomy, and the operative performance was evaluated using an assessment tool.

RESULTS

A total of 18 residents were randomized and completed the study, 6 in each arm. The mean baseline score on the simulator was comparable in each group (67% for PPF, 68% for PP, and 70% for F). While the median score on the assessment tool for laparoscopic salpingectomy in the PPF group was the highest, there was no statistically significant difference in assessment scores for the PPF group (32.75; range, 15-36) compared to the PP group (14.5; range, 10-34) and the F group (21.25; range, 10.5-32). The interrater correlation between the video reviewers was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.95) using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a surgical preoperative practice with instructor feedback may not improve operative technique compared to either preoperative practice or feedback alone.

摘要

背景

有证据表明手术前的术前练习可以提高实习生的表现,但尚未研究出最佳方法。

目的

我们试图确定与单独的术前练习或反馈相比,手术实习生在术前练习并得到教员反馈是否能改善手术技术。

方法

我们对妇产科实习生进行了一项随机对照试验,根据模拟器评估的手术技能进行分层。参与者被随机分配到在模拟器上进行术前练习并得到教员反馈(PPF)、单独进行术前练习(PP)或仅接受反馈(F)组。然后实习生完成腹腔镜输卵管切除术,并使用评估工具对手术表现进行评估。

结果

共有18名住院医师被随机分组并完成研究,每组6人。每组在模拟器上的平均基线分数相当(PPF组为67%,PP组为68%,F组为70%)。虽然PPF组腹腔镜输卵管切除术评估工具的中位数分数最高,但与PP组(14.5;范围10 - 34)和F组(21.25;范围10.5 - 32)相比,PPF组的评估分数没有统计学上的显著差异。使用组内相关系数,视频评审员之间的评分者间相关性为0.87(95%置信区间0.70 - 0.95)。

结论

这项研究表明,与单独的术前练习或反馈相比,有教员反馈的手术术前练习可能不会改善手术技术。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of warm-up on surgical performance: a systematic review.热身对手术操作的影响:一项系统综述。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1259-69. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3811-4. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
2
Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery.针对外科实习生的腹腔镜手术虚拟现实培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 27;2013(8):CD006575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006575.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验