• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同时性反馈与终末性反馈:等待可能更好。

Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait.

机构信息

Wilson Centre, 200 Elizabeth Street, Eaton South 1E-583, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 2C5.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10 Suppl):S54-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf
PMID:19907387
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Feedback is an important feature of simulation-based education. This study investigated the optimal timing of feedback for technical skills learning in novices.

METHOD

Thirty novice endoscopists were pretested on a colonoscopy simulator task. Participants then received feedback either during (concurrent) or after (terminal) each of their 12 practice trials. Effectiveness of training was assessed using an immediate posttest and one week later on retention and transfer tests. Measures included execution time and blinded expert assessments.

RESULTS

Both groups performed similarly on the pre-, post-, and retention tests. At transfer, the terminal feedback group performed significantly better as measured by execution time, checklist, and global rating scores. The concurrent feedback group's performance decreased significantly on the transfer test as compared with the posttest and retention test.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all feedback conditions seem equally effective. The use of terminal feedback resulted in better learning as demonstrated by superior performance during transfer.

摘要

背景

反馈是模拟教学的一个重要特征。本研究旨在探讨新手技术技能学习中反馈的最佳时机。

方法

30 名新手内镜医师在结肠镜检查模拟器任务上进行了预测试。然后,参与者在 12 次练习中每次练习结束后(同时)或结束后(终端)接受反馈。使用即时后测和一周后的保留和转移测试来评估培训效果。测量包括执行时间和盲法专家评估。

结果

两组在预测试、后测试和保留测试中的表现相似。在转移测试中,终端反馈组在执行时间、检查表和总体评分方面的表现明显优于同期反馈组。与后测和保留测试相比,同期反馈组在转移测试中的表现明显下降。

结论

并非所有反馈条件都同样有效。终端反馈的使用通过在转移过程中更好的表现导致了更好的学习。

相似文献

1
Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait.同时性反馈与终末性反馈:等待可能更好。
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10 Suppl):S54-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf.
2
Learning in the simulated setting: a comparison of expert-, peer-, and computer-assisted learning.模拟环境中的学习:专家指导学习、同伴学习和计算机辅助学习的比较。
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10 Suppl):S12-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a72c7.
3
Impact of a simulation training curriculum on technical and nontechnical skills in colonoscopy: a randomized trial.模拟培训课程对结肠镜检查技术和非技术技能的影响:一项随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1072-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 23.
4
Concurrent terminal feedback: The effect of feedback delivery on lumbar puncture skills in simulation training.同时终端反馈:反馈传递对模拟训练中腰椎穿刺技能的影响。
Med Teach. 2023 Aug;45(8):906-912. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2189540. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback.向医学生教授缝合和打结技能:一项比较基于计算机的视频教学与(同步和总结性)专家反馈的随机对照研究。
Surgery. 2007 Apr;141(4):442-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.012. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
6
Non-technical skills curriculum incorporating simulation-based training improves performance in colonoscopy among novice endoscopists: Randomized controlled trial.纳入基于模拟训练的非技术技能课程可提高新手内镜医师结肠镜检查操作水平:随机对照试验。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Sep;32(6):940-948. doi: 10.1111/den.13623. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training.结肠镜检查技能的培训和转移:一项关于模拟器与床旁培训的多国、随机、盲法、对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
8
How to improve movement execution in sidestep cutting? Involve me and I will learn.如何提高侧身滑步的动作执行能力?让我参与进来,我会学习的。
Hum Mov Sci. 2023 Aug;90:103115. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103115. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
9
Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.腹腔镜计算机模拟器与箱式训练器在新手内镜手术训练中的效果比较。
J Surg Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;68(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 May 4.
10
The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity Virtual-Reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial.使用高保真虚拟现实模拟对胃肠道内镜检查培训中建设性反馈的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Gut. 2010 Feb;59(2):181-5. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.191825. Epub 2009 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational Method to Promote Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Eating Disorders: A Cluster-Randomized Study of the Effects of Retrieval Practice Amongst Medical Trainees.促进饮食失调症识别、诊断和治疗的教育方法:一项关于医学实习生检索练习效果的整群随机研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):e71552. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71552. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Application of motor learning theory to teach the head impulse test to emergency medicine resident physicians.应用运动学习理论向急诊医学住院医师教授头部脉冲试验。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Feb 21;8(1):e10936. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10936. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
A journey towards pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and its training: a narrative review.
儿科胃肠内镜检查及其培训之旅:一篇叙述性综述
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 28;11:1201593. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1201593. eCollection 2023.
4
What does "Timely" Mean to Residents? Challenging Feedback Assumptions in Postgraduate Education.“Timely”对住院医师意味着什么?对研究生教育中反馈假设的挑战。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jun 14;12(1):218-227. doi: 10.5334/pme.1052. eCollection 2023.
5
Are we talking about practice? A randomized study comparing simulation-based deliberate practice and mastery learning to self-guided practice.我们在谈论实践吗?一项随机研究比较了基于模拟的刻意练习和掌握学习与自我指导练习。
CJEM. 2023 Aug;25(8):667-675. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00531-0. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.乙状结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):181-200. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102259. eCollection 2023.
7
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.
8
Ticket to perform: an explorative study of trainees' engagement in and transfer of surgical training.手术培训:探索培训生参与和转移手术培训的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04048-z.
9
Educator-student talk during interprofessional simulation-based teaching.跨专业模拟教学期间教育者与学生的交流
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Jun 30;6(4):206-213. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000455. eCollection 2020.
10
JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.食管胃十二指肠镜检查培训与认证的JAG共识声明。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 24;13(3):193-205. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101907. eCollection 2022.