Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Einthoven Laboratory for Experimental Vascular Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jul;15(7):1386-1391. doi: 10.1111/jth.13715. Epub 2017 May 30.
Essentials Low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWH) kinetics differ which may result in different bleeding risks. A cohort of 12 934 venous thrombosis patients on LMWH was followed until major bleeding. The absolute major bleeding risk was low among patients registered at the anticoagulation clinic. Once-daily dosing was associated with a lower bleeding risk as compared with twice-daily.
Background Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are considered members of a class of drugs with similar anticoagulant properties. However, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics between LMWHs differ, which may result in different bleeding risks. As these agents are used by many patients, small differences may lead to a large effect on numbers of major bleeding events. Objectives To determine major bleeding risks for different LMWH agents and dosing schedules. Methods A cohort of acute venous thrombosis patients from four anticoagulation clinics who used an LMWH and a vitamin K antagonist were followed until they ceased LMWH treatment or until major bleeding. Exposures were classified according to different types of LMWHs and for b.i.d. and o.d. use. Cumulative incidences for major bleeding per 1000 patients and risk ratios were calculated and adjusted for study center. Results The study comprised 12 934 patients with a mean age of 59 years; 6218 (48%) were men. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 2.5 per 1000 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-3.5). Enoxaparin b.i.d. or o.d. was associated with a relative bleeding risk of 1.7 (95% CI, 0.2-17.5) compared with nadroparin o.d. In addition, a nadroparin b.i.d. dosing schedule was associated with a 2.0-fold increased major bleeding risk (95% CI, 0.8-5.1) as compared with a nadroparin o.d. dosing schedule. Conclusions Absolute major bleeding rates were low for all LMWH agents and dosing schedules in a large unselected cohort. Nevertheless, twice-daily dosing with nadroparin appeared to be associated with an increased major bleeding risk as compared with once-daily dosing, as also suggested in a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
低分子肝素(LMWH)的药代动力学不同,可能导致出血风险不同。对 12934 例接受 LMWH 治疗的静脉血栓形成患者进行了随访,直至发生大出血。在抗凝诊所登记的患者中,绝对大出血风险较低。与每日两次给药相比,每日一次给药出血风险较低。
背景:低分子肝素(LMWH)被认为是一类具有相似抗凝特性的药物。然而,LMWH 的药代动力学和药效学不同,可能导致出血风险不同。由于这些药物被许多患者使用,因此微小的差异可能会对大出血事件的数量产生很大的影响。目的:确定不同 LMWH 药物和给药方案的大出血风险。方法:对来自四个抗凝诊所的使用 LMWH 和维生素 K 拮抗剂的急性静脉血栓形成患者进行了队列研究,直到他们停止使用 LMWH 治疗或发生大出血。根据不同类型的 LMWH 和每日两次或每日一次给药进行暴露分类。计算每 1000 例患者发生大出血的累积发生率和风险比,并根据研究中心进行调整。结果:该研究共纳入 12934 例患者,平均年龄 59 岁,6218 例(48%)为男性。大出血的累积发生率为每 1000 例患者 2.5 例(95%可信区间,1.7-3.5)。依诺肝素每日两次或每日一次给药与那屈肝素每日一次给药相比,出血风险相对增加 1.7(95%可信区间,0.2-17.5)。此外,与那屈肝素每日一次给药相比,那屈肝素每日两次给药方案出血风险增加 2.0 倍(95%可信区间,0.8-5.1)。结论:在一项大型未选择的队列中,所有 LMWH 药物和给药方案的绝对大出血发生率均较低。然而,与每日一次给药相比,那屈肝素每日两次给药似乎与大出血风险增加相关,这也与对照临床试验的荟萃分析结果一致。