van Loon Maarten Caspar, Smits Cas, Smit Conrad F, Hensen Erik F, Merkus Paul
*Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Section Ear & Hearing, VU University Medical Center †The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):e100-e106. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001418.
This study addresses the outcome of cochlear implantation in addition to hearing aid use in patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.
Prospective longitudinal study.
Tertiary referral center.
Seven adults with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss, i.e., less than 30% aided speech recognition in their worst hearing ear and 60 to 85% speech recognition in their best hearing ear. All patients had a postlingual onset of their hearing loss and less than 20 years of auditory deprivation of their worst hearing ear.
Cochlear implantation in the functionally deaf ear.
Speech recognition in quiet, speech recognition in noise, spatial speech recognition, localization abilities, music appreciation, and quality of life. Measurements were performed before cochlear implantation and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation.
Before cochlear implantation, the average speech recognition of the ear fitted with a hearing aid was 74%. Cochlear implantation eventually resulted in an average speech recognition of 75%. Bimodal stimulation yielded speech recognition scores of 82, 86, and 88% after 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At all time intervals, bimodal stimulation resulted in a significantly better speech recognition as compared with stimulation with only hearing aid or only cochlear implant (CI). Speech recognition in noise and spatial speech recognition significantly improved as well as the ability to localize sounds and the quality of life.
This study demonstrated that patients are able to successfully integrate electrical stimulation with contralateral acoustic amplification and benefit from bimodal stimulation. Therefore, we think that cochlear implantation should be considered in this particular group of patients, even in the presence of substantial residual hearing on the contralateral side.
本研究探讨除使用助听器外,不对称感音神经性听力损失患者进行人工耳蜗植入的效果。
前瞻性纵向研究。
三级转诊中心。
7名不对称感音神经性听力损失的成年人,即听力最差耳的助听听阈言语识别率低于30%,听力最佳耳的言语识别率为60%至85%。所有患者的听力损失均发生在语言形成之后,听力最差耳的听觉剥夺时间少于20年。
对功能聋耳进行人工耳蜗植入。
安静环境下的言语识别、噪声环境下的言语识别、空间言语识别、定位能力、音乐欣赏和生活质量。在人工耳蜗植入前以及植入后3个月、6个月和12个月进行测量。
人工耳蜗植入前,佩戴助听器耳的平均言语识别率为74%。人工耳蜗植入最终使平均言语识别率达到75%。双模式刺激在3个月、6个月和12个月后的言语识别得分分别为82%、86%和88%。在所有时间点,与仅使用助听器或仅使用人工耳蜗(CI)刺激相比,双模式刺激导致的言语识别明显更好。噪声环境下的言语识别和空间言语识别显著改善,声音定位能力和生活质量也得到改善。
本研究表明,患者能够成功地将电刺激与对侧声放大相结合,并从双模式刺激中获益。因此,我们认为即使对侧存在大量残余听力,这一特定患者群体也应考虑进行人工耳蜗植入。