Suppr超能文献

帕金森病痴呆晚期的居家身体行为:认知亚型之间的差异

Home-Based Physical Behavior in Late Stage Parkinson Disease Dementia: Differences between Cognitive Subtypes.

作者信息

Cerff Bernhard, Maetzler Walter, Sulzer Patricia, Kampmeyer Malte, Prinzen Jos, Hobert Markus A, Blum Dominik, van Lummel Rob, Del Din Silvia, Gräber Susanne, Berg Daniela, Liepelt-Scarfone Inga

机构信息

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Neurodegener Dis. 2017;17(4-5):135-144. doi: 10.1159/000460251. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For the early diagnosis of Parkinson disease dementia (PDD), objective home-based tools are needed to quantify even mild stages of dysfunction of the activities of daily living (ADL).

OBJECTIVES

In this pilot study, home-based physical behavior was assessed to examine whether it is possible to distinguish mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) from PDD.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with mild to severe Parkinson disease (PD) participated in this cross-sectional study. Based on comprehensive neuropsychological testing, PD patients were classified as cognitively nonimpaired (PD-NC), PD-MCI or PDD. For physical behavior assessments, patients wore the accelerometer DynaPort® (McRoberts) for 3 days. Ordinal logistic regression models with continuous Y were applied to correct results for motor impairment and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

After excluding 7 patients due to insufficient wearing time, 48 patients with a mean of 2 recorded days were analyzed (17 PD-NC, 22 PD-MCI, 9 PDD). ADL-impaired PDD patients showed fewer sedentary bouts than non-ADL-impaired PD-MCI (p = 0.01, odds ratio [OR] = 8.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8-45.2) and PD-NC (p = 0.01, OR = 10.3, CI = 1.6-67.3) patients, as well as a longer sedentary bout length (PD-NC: p = 0.02, OR = 0.1, CI = 0.02-0.65; PD-MCI: p = 0.02, OR = 0.14, CI = 0.03-0.69). These differences were mainly caused by fewer (PD-NC: p = 0.02, OR = 9.6, CI = 1.5-62.4; PD-MCI: p = 0.01, OR = 8.5, CI = 1.5-37.3) but longer sitting bouts (PD-NC: p = 0.03, OR = 0.12, CI = 0.02-0.80; PD-MCI: p = 0.04, OR = 0.19, CI = 0.04-0.93). Tests assessing executive function, visuoconstruction and attention correlated significantly with specific activity parameters (ρ ≥ 0.3; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Objective assessment of physical behavior, in particular the detection of sedentary bouts, is a promising contributor to the discrimination between PD-MCI and PDD.

摘要

背景

为了早期诊断帕金森病痴呆(PDD),需要基于家庭的客观工具来量化日常生活活动(ADL)功能障碍的轻度阶段。

目的

在这项初步研究中,对基于家庭的身体行为进行评估,以检查是否有可能区分轻度认知障碍(PD-MCI)和PDD。

方法

55例轻度至重度帕金森病(PD)患者参与了这项横断面研究。基于全面的神经心理学测试,PD患者被分类为认知未受损(PD-NC)、PD-MCI或PDD。对于身体行为评估,患者佩戴加速度计DynaPort®(麦克罗伯茨公司)3天。应用带有连续Y的有序逻辑回归模型来校正运动障碍和抑郁症状的结果。

结果

由于佩戴时间不足排除7例患者后,对48例平均记录2天的患者进行了分析(17例PD-NC,22例PD-MCI,9例PDD)。ADL受损的PDD患者比未出现ADL受损的PD-MCI患者(p = 0.01,优势比[OR] = 8.9,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.8 - 45.2)和PD-NC患者(p = 0.01,OR = 10.3,CI = 1.6 - 67.3)久坐发作次数更少,且久坐发作持续时间更长(与PD-NC相比:p = 0.02,OR = 0.1,CI = 0.02 - 0.65;与PD-MCI相比:p = 0.02,OR = 0.14,CI = 0.03 - 0.69)。这些差异主要是由较少的(与PD-NC相比:p = 0.02,OR = 9.6,CI = 1.5 - 62.4;与PD-MCI相比:p = 0.01,OR = 8.5,CI = 1.5 - 37.3)但更长的坐姿发作导致的(与PD-NC相比:p = 0.03,OR = 0.12,CI = 0.02 - 0.80;与PD-MCI相比:p = 0.04,OR = 0.19,CI = 0.04 - 0.93)。评估执行功能、视觉构建和注意力的测试与特定活动参数显著相关(ρ≥0.3;p < 0.05)。

结论

对身体行为的客观评估,特别是久坐发作的检测,有望有助于区分PD-MCI和PDD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验