Suppr超能文献

评估非痴呆型帕金森病患者认知驱动的日常生活活动障碍。

Assessment of cognitive-driven activity of daily living impairment in non-demented Parkinson's patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany.

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), University of Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Neuropsychol. 2020 Mar;14(1):69-84. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12173. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Abstract

The core criterion for Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) is the impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) function primarily caused by cognitive, not motor symptoms. There is evidence to assume that mild ADL impairments in mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) characterize those patients at high risk for dementia. Data of 216 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients assessed with comprehensive motor and neuropsychological assessments were analysed. Based on linear regression models, subscores of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) primarily reflecting patients' global cognitive status (FAQ ) or PD-related motor severity (FAQ ) were developed. A quotient (FAQ ) of both scores was calculated, with values >1 indicating more cognitive- compared to motor-driven ADL impairment. Both FAQ and FAQ scores were higher in PD-MCI than cognitively normal (PD-CN) patients, indicating more severe cognitive- and motor-driven ADL impairments in this group. One third (31.6%) of the PD-MCI group had a FAQ score >1, which was significantly different from patients with PD-CN (p = .02). PD-MCI patients with an FAQ score >1 were more impaired on tests assessing attention (p = .019) and language (p = .033) compared to PD-MCI patients with lower FAQ values. The differentiation between cognitive- and motor-driven ADL is important, as the loss of functional capacity is the defining factor for a diagnosis of PDD. We were able to differentiate the cognitive-driven from the motor-driven ADL impairments for the FAQ. PD-MCI patients with more cognitive- compared to motor-driven ADL impairments may pose a risk group for conversion to PDD and can be targeted for early treatments.

摘要

帕金森病痴呆(PDD)的核心标准是日常生活活动(ADL)功能受损,主要由认知而非运动症状引起。有证据假设轻度认知障碍(PD-MCI)中的轻度 ADL 损害特征是那些具有痴呆高风险的患者。对 216 名接受全面运动和神经心理学评估的帕金森病(PD)患者的数据进行了分析。基于线性回归模型,开发了主要反映患者整体认知状态(FAQ)或与 PD 相关的运动严重程度(FAQ)的功能活动问卷(FAQ)子分数。计算了这两个分数的商(FAQ),值>1 表示与运动相关的 ADL 损害相比,认知相关的 ADL 损害更多。PD-MCI 患者的 FAQ 和 FAQ 评分均高于认知正常(PD-CN)患者,表明该组患者的认知和运动相关 ADL 损害更严重。三分之一(31.6%)的 PD-MCI 组的 FAQ 评分>1,与 PD-CN 患者相比差异显著(p=.02)。FAQ 评分>1 的 PD-MCI 患者在评估注意力(p=.019)和语言(p=.033)的测试中受损更严重,与 FAQ 值较低的 PD-MCI 患者相比。区分认知和运动驱动的 ADL 很重要,因为功能能力的丧失是 PDD 诊断的定义因素。我们能够区分 FAQ 中的认知驱动和运动驱动的 ADL 损害。与运动相关的 ADL 相比,认知相关的 ADL 损害更多的 PD-MCI 患者可能构成向 PDD 转化的风险组,并且可以针对早期治疗进行靶向治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验