Findal Gry, Helbig Anne, Haugen Guttorm, Jenum Pål A, Stray-Pedersen Babill
University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1300-1.
Primary infection with Toxoplasma gondii during pregnancy may pose a threat to the fetus. Women infected prior to conception are unlikely to transmit the parasite to the fetus. If maternal serology indicates a possible primary infection, amniocentesis for toxoplasma PCR analysis is performed and antiparasitic treatment given. However, discriminating between primary and latent infection is challenging and unnecessary amniocenteses may occur. Procedure-related fetal loss after amniocentesis is of concern. The aim of the present study was to determine whether amniocentesis is performed on the correct patients and whether the procedure is safe for this indication.
Retrospective study analysing data from all singleton pregnancies (n = 346) at Oslo University Hospital undergoing amniocentesis due to suspected maternal primary toxoplasma infection during 1993-2013. Maternal, neonatal and infant data were obtained from clinical hospital records, laboratory records and pregnancy charts. All serum samples were analysed at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health or at the Toxoplasma Reference Laboratory at Oslo University Hospital. The amniocenteses were performed at Oslo University Hospital by experienced personnel. Time of maternal infection was evaluated retrospectively based on serology results.
50% (173) of the women were infected before pregnancy, 23% (80) possibly in pregnancy and 27% (93) were certainly infected during pregnancy. Forty-nine (14%) women seroconverted, 42 (12%) had IgG antibody increase and 255 (74%) women had IgM positivity and low IgG avidity/high dye test titre. Fifteen offspring were infected with toxoplasma, one of them with negative PCR in the amniotic fluid. Median gestational age at amniocentesis was 16.7 gestational weeks (GWs) (Q = 15, Q = 22), with median sample volume 4 ml (Q = 3, Q = 7). Two miscarriages occurred 4 weeks after the procedure, both performed in GW 13. One of these had severe fetal toxoplasma infection.
Half of our study population were infected before pregnancy. In order to reduce the unnecessary amniocenteses we advise confirmatory serology 3 weeks after a suspect result and suggest that the serology is interpreted by dedicated multidisciplinary staff. Amniocentesis is safe and useful as a diagnostic procedure in diagnosing congenital toxoplasma infection when performed after 15 GW.
孕期初次感染弓形虫可能会对胎儿构成威胁。受孕前已感染的女性不太可能将寄生虫传染给胎儿。如果母体血清学检查表明可能是初次感染,则需进行羊膜穿刺术以进行弓形虫聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析,并给予抗寄生虫治疗。然而,区分初次感染和潜伏感染具有挑战性,可能会出现不必要的羊膜穿刺术。羊膜穿刺术后与操作相关的胎儿丢失令人担忧。本研究的目的是确定羊膜穿刺术是否应用于合适的患者,以及该操作对于这一适应证是否安全。
回顾性研究分析了1993年至2013年期间在奥斯陆大学医院因疑似母体初次弓形虫感染而接受羊膜穿刺术的所有单胎妊娠(n = 346)的数据。母体、新生儿和婴儿的数据从临床医院记录、实验室记录和妊娠图表中获取。所有血清样本均在挪威公共卫生研究所或奥斯陆大学医院的弓形虫参考实验室进行分析。羊膜穿刺术由奥斯陆大学医院经验丰富的人员进行。根据血清学结果对母体感染时间进行回顾性评估。
50%(173例)女性在怀孕前已感染,23%(80例)可能在孕期感染,27%(93例)肯定在孕期感染。49例(14%)女性血清转化,42例(12%)IgG抗体升高,255例(74%)女性IgM阳性且IgG亲和力低/染料试验滴度高。15例后代感染了弓形虫,其中1例羊水PCR检测为阴性。羊膜穿刺术时的中位孕周为16.7孕周(四分位数Q1 = 15,Q3 = 22),中位样本量为4 ml(Q1 = 3,Q3 = 7)。术后4周发生了2例流产,均在孕13周时进行。其中1例有严重的胎儿弓形虫感染。
我们研究人群中有一半在怀孕前已感染。为了减少不必要的羊膜穿刺术,我们建议在可疑结果出现3周后进行确诊血清学检查,并建议由专门的多学科工作人员解读血清学结果。羊膜穿刺术在孕15周后进行时,作为诊断先天性弓形虫感染的诊断方法是安全且有用的。