Uebbing Lukas, Klumpp Lukas, Webster Gregory K, Löbenberg Raimar
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Apr 11;11:1163-1174. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S131213. eCollection 2017.
Drug product performance testing is an important part of quality-by-design approaches, but this process often lacks the underlying mechanistic understanding of the complex interactions between the disintegration and dissolution processes involved. Whereas a recent draft guideline by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed the replacement of dissolution testing with disintegration testing, the mentioned criteria are not globally accepted. This study provides scientific justification for using disintegration testing rather than dissolution testing as a quality control method for certain immediate release (IR) formulations. A mechanistic approach, which is beyond the current FDA criteria, is presented. Dissolution testing via United States Pharmacopeial Convention Apparatus II at various paddle speeds was performed for immediate and extended release formulations of metronidazole. Dissolution profile fitting via DDSolver and dissolution profile predictions via DDDPlus™ were performed. The results showed that Fickian diffusion and drug particle properties (DPP) were responsible for the dissolution of the IR tablets, and that formulation factors (eg, coning) impacted dissolution only at lower rotation speeds. Dissolution was completely formulation controlled if extended release tablets were tested and DPP were not important. To demonstrate that disintegration is the most important dosage form attribute when dissolution is DPP controlled, disintegration, intrinsic dissolution and dissolution testing were performed in conventional and disintegration impacting media (DIM). Tablet disintegration was affected by DIM and model fitting to the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation showed a growing effect of the formulation in DIM. DDDPlus was able to predict tablet dissolution and the intrinsic dissolution profiles in conventional media and DIM. The study showed that disintegration has to occur before DPP-dependent dissolution can happen. The study suggests that disintegration can be used as performance test of rapidly disintegrating tablets beyond the FDA criteria. The scientific criteria and justification is that dissolution has to be DPP dependent, originated from active pharmaceutical ingredient characteristics and formulations factors have to be negligible.
药品性能测试是质量源于设计方法的重要组成部分,但该过程往往缺乏对所涉及的崩解和溶出过程之间复杂相互作用的潜在机理理解。尽管美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)最近的一份指南草案允许用崩解测试替代溶出测试,但上述标准并未得到全球认可。本研究为使用崩解测试而非溶出测试作为某些速释(IR)制剂的质量控制方法提供了科学依据。提出了一种超出当前FDA标准的机理方法。对甲硝唑的速释和缓释制剂,通过美国药典装置II在不同桨速下进行溶出测试。通过DDSolver进行溶出曲线拟合,并通过DDDPlus™进行溶出曲线预测。结果表明,菲克扩散和药物颗粒性质(DPP)是IR片剂溶出的原因,并且制剂因素(如锥形)仅在较低转速下影响溶出。如果测试缓释片且DPP不重要,则溶出完全由制剂控制。为了证明当溶出受DPP控制时崩解是最重要的剂型属性,在常规和崩解影响介质(DIM)中进行了崩解、固有溶出和溶出测试。片剂崩解受DIM影响,对Korsmeyer-Peppas方程的模型拟合表明制剂在DIM中的影响越来越大。DDDPlus能够预测常规介质和DIM中的片剂溶出和固有溶出曲线。该研究表明,在依赖DPP的溶出发生之前必须先发生崩解。该研究表明,崩解可作为超出FDA标准的快速崩解片剂的性能测试。科学标准和依据是溶出必须依赖DPP,源于活性药物成分特性且制剂因素可忽略不计。