Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
AAPS J. 2012 Sep;14(3):462-72. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9350-9. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
This study compared in vitro dissolution characteristics and other quality measures of different amoxicillin, metronidazole, and zidovudine products purchased in the Americas to a comparator pharmaceutical product (CPP). These three drugs are classified as Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class I drugs with the possibility that dissolution findings might be used to document bioequivalence. All investigated zidovudine products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. Only 3 of 12 tested amoxicillin products were found to be in vitro equivalent to the CPP. None of the tested metronidazole products were in vitro equivalent to the CPP. These findings suggest but do not confirm bioinequivalence where in vitro comparisons failed, given that an in vivo blood level study might have confirmed bioequivalence. At times, identifying a CPP in one of the selected markets proved difficult. The study demonstrates that products sold across national markets may not be bioequivalent. When coupled with the challenge of identifying a CPP in different countries, the results of this study suggest the value of an international CPP as well as increased use of BCS approaches as means of either documenting bioequivalence or signaling the need for further in vivo studies. Because of increased movement of medicines across national borders, practitioners and patients would benefit from these approaches.
本研究比较了在美洲购买的不同阿莫西林、甲硝唑和齐多夫定产品与参比药物产品(CPP)的体外溶出特性和其他质量指标。这三种药物被归类为生物药剂学分类系统 I 类药物,有可能通过溶解发现来证明生物等效性。所有研究的齐多夫定产品均被发现与 CPP 在体外等效。只有 12 种测试的阿莫西林产品中的 3 种被发现与 CPP 在体外等效。测试的甲硝唑产品均与 CPP 不具有体外等效性。这些发现表明(但不能确认)在体外比较失败的情况下存在生物等效性不足,因为体内血液水平研究可能已经证实了生物等效性。有时,在选定的市场中确定 CPP 比较困难。该研究表明,在不同国家/地区销售的产品可能无法达到生物等效性。结合在不同国家/地区确定 CPP 的挑战,本研究结果表明使用国际 CPP 以及增加 BCS 方法的价值,这些方法既可以证明生物等效性,也可以表明需要进一步进行体内研究。由于药物在国家之间的流通增加,这些方法将使从业者和患者受益。