CORR Insights: Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.
作者信息
Lakstein Dror
机构信息
Orthopedic Department, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, POB 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2071-2073. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5362-1. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
CORR Insights: Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.CORR见解：在二期全髋关节置换术翻修治疗感染期间进行一期髋臼翻修对特定患者有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2071-2073. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5362-1. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
2
CORR Insights(®): Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.CORR 见解(®)：定制髋臼笼为严重骨缺损的翻修全髋关节置换术提供稳定固定并改善髋关节评分
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Mar;474(3):741-3. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4649-3. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
3
Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.在两阶段全髋关节置换术翻修治疗感染过程中，对特定患者进行单阶段髋臼翻修是有效的。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Aug;475(8):2063-2070. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5334-5. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
CORR Insights®: Do Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Rerevision After Revision THA Performed for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Study Using the NJR Data Set.CORR见解®：对于因假体周围关节感染而行翻修全髋关节置换术的患者，小梁金属髋臼组件是否能降低再次翻修的风险？一项使用英国国家关节注册中心（NJR）数据集的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1390-1391. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000598.
5
CORR Insights(®): Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.CORR 见解(®)：非骨水泥型初次全髋关节置换术中双动髋臼杯早期并发症发生率低
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2188-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4874-4. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
CORR Insights®: What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?CORR 见解®：55岁以下患者使用髋臼和股骨嵌压植骨进行骨水泥型翻修全髋关节置换术的长期结果如何？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):92-94. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001528.
7
CORR Insights(®): Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.CORR 见解（®）：金属对金属全髋关节置换术髋臼翻修术后并发症并未增加
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2143-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4870-8. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
CORR Insights(®): does cup-cage reconstruction with oversized cups provide initial stability in THA for osteoporotic acetabular fractures?CORR 见解（®）：使用超大髋臼杯进行杯-臼重建能否为骨质疏松性髋臼骨折的全髋关节置换术提供初始稳定性？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3820-1. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4534-0. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
9
[Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients].老年患者髋臼骨折的早期初次全髋关节置换术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Aug;73(4):275-82.
10
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report.使用带钩髋臼加强环的翻修全髋关节置换术：对先前报告的平均11.4年的精确随访
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):503-509. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
本文引用的文献
1
Quantification of Peri-Implant Bacterial Load and in Vivo Biofilm Formation in an Innovative, Clinically Representative Mouse Model of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.在一种创新的、具有临床代表性的人工关节感染小鼠模型中对种植体周围细菌载量和体内生物膜形成进行定量分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Mar 15;99(6):e25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00815.
2
The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.高选择性植入物固定在感染性髋关节置换术中的作用
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2157-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4936-7.
3
The Use of a Supra-Acetabular Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Shelf to Improve Hip Stability in First-Stage Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty.使用髋臼上载抗生素骨水泥托来改善一期感染性全髋关节置换术中的髋关节稳定性。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2574-2578. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Mouse model of post-arthroplasty Staphylococcus epidermidis joint infection.人工关节置换术后表皮葡萄球菌关节感染的小鼠模型
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1106:173-81. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-736-5_16.
5
Single- or two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature.单阶段或双阶段翻修治疗感染性全髋关节置换术？文献系统综述。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Mar;472(3):1036-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3294-y. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
6
Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.部分二期髋关节置换术治疗感染性全髋关节置换术：初步报告。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):437-48. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3168-3.
7
Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.保留固定良好的非骨水泥假体治疗感染性髋关节置换术。
Acta Orthop. 2013 Jun;84(3):260-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.795830. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
8
Preservation of the original femoral cement mantle during the management of infected cemented total hip replacement by two-stage revision.两期翻修治疗感染性骨水泥型全髋关节置换时保留原股骨骨水泥壳
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):322-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.28256.
9
What is the evidence base to guide surgical treatment of infected hip prostheses? systematic review of longitudinal studies in unselected patients.指导感染性髋关节假体外科治疗的循证依据是什么？未选择患者的纵向研究的系统评价。
BMC Med. 2012 Feb 16;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-18.
10
A modified cement spacer technique for infected total hip arthroplasties with significant bone loss.改良水泥间隔器技术治疗伴有严重骨质丢失的感染性全髋关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Apr;27(4):613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.031. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
Zotero 插件