Suppr超能文献

部分二期髋关节置换术治疗感染性全髋关节置换术:初步报告。

Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

机构信息

Joint Implant Surgeons, Inc, 7277 Smith's Mill Road, Suite 200, New Albany, OH, 43054, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):437-48. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3168-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One common approach to the infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) calls for a staged revision, including removal of all components. However, removal of well-fixed femoral components can result in bone loss and compromised fixation; it is not known whether it is effective to leave a well-fixed femoral component in situ, remove only the acetabular component, débride thoroughly, place a spacer, and delay reimplantation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to determine (1) the frequency of infection recurrence; (2) the frequency of death; and (3) the Harris hip scores of patients treated with a "two-stage partial exchange" approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from 2000 through January 2011 revealed 19 patients with infected THA treated with partial two-stage exchange including complete acetabular component removal, aggressive soft tissue débridement, retention of the well-fixed femoral stem, placement of an antibiotic-laden cement femoral head on the trunnion of the retained stem, postoperative course of antibiotics, and delayed reimplantation. Indications for this treatment included those patients whose femoral component was determined to be well fixed and its removal would result in significant femoral bone loss and compromise of future fixation. During the study period, this represented 7% (19 of 262) of the patients whom we treated for a chronically infected THA. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 4 years; range, 2-11 years). None of the 19 patients in this series were lost to followup. We defined failure as recurrence of infection in the same hip or the use of long-term suppressive antibiotics.

RESULTS

Two patients (11%), both with prior failure of two-staged treatment of infection, failed secondary to recurrence of infection at an average of 3.3 years. There were no patient deaths within 90 days. The mean Harris hip score was 68 (range, 31-100; best score is 100).

CONCLUSIONS

Insofar as 89% of patients in this series were clinically free of infection at a minimum of 2 years, we believe partial two-stage exchange may represent an acceptable option for patients with infected THA when femoral component removal would result in significant bone loss and compromise of reconstruction. Further study is required on this approach.

摘要

背景

对于感染性全髋关节置换术(THA),一种常见的方法是分期翻修,包括去除所有组件。然而,去除固定良好的股骨组件可能导致骨丢失和固定受损;目前尚不清楚在原位保留固定良好的股骨组件、仅去除髋臼组件、彻底清创、放置间隔物并延迟再植入是否有效。

问题/目的:本研究的目的是确定(1)感染复发的频率;(2)死亡的频率;以及(3)采用“两期部分置换”方法治疗的患者的 Harris 髋关节评分。

方法

回顾性分析 2000 年至 2011 年 1 月期间的资料,发现 19 例感染性 THA 患者采用部分两期置换治疗,包括完整髋臼组件去除、积极的软组织清创、保留固定良好的股骨柄、将抗生素负载水泥股骨头放置在保留的股骨柄的轴上、术后抗生素疗程和延迟再植入。这种治疗的适应证包括那些股骨组件被认为固定良好的患者,其去除会导致显著的股骨骨丢失和未来固定受损。在研究期间,这代表了我们治疗慢性感染性 THA 的 262 例患者中的 7%(19 例)。最低随访时间为 2 年(平均 4 年;范围,2-11 年)。本系列中没有 19 例患者失访。我们将失败定义为同一髋关节感染复发或使用长期抑制性抗生素。

结果

2 例(11%)患者,均为两期治疗感染失败,平均 3.3 年后因感染复发而失败。90 天内无患者死亡。平均 Harris 髋关节评分为 68 分(范围,31-100;最佳评分为 100)。

结论

在本系列中,89%的患者在至少 2 年内临床无感染,我们认为当股骨组件去除会导致显著骨丢失和重建受损时,部分两期置换可能是感染性 THA 患者的一种可接受的选择。需要进一步研究这种方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Infected total hip arthroplasty revision: one- or two-stage procedure?感染性全髋关节翻修术:一期还是二期手术?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Apr;98(2):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.08.018. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验