Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, South Korea.
Acta Orthop. 2013 Jun;84(3):260-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.795830. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
Two-stage reconstruction, reimplantation after removal of an infected prosthesis, has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of infected hip arthroplasty. However, during the removal of a well-fixed femoral stem, the proximal femur can be damaged and a sequestrum can be formed, which might lead to chronic osteomyelitis and difficulty in reimplantation. We wanted to determine whether infection after hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of a well-fixed stem.
We treated 19 patients who had an infection after hip replacement, but a well-fixed cementless stem, with 2-stage reconstruction. At the first stage, we removed the acetabular cup, the liner and the head, but not the stem. We then implanted a cup of cement spacer. After control of infection, we reimplanted the acetabular component and head.
2 patients did not undergo second-stage reconstruction because they were satisfied with the pain relief and the activity that they had with the cement-spacer implantation. The remaining 17 patients underwent the second-stage of the reconstruction using cementless arthroplasty. At a mean follow-up time of 4 (2-8) years, 15 of the patients had no recurrence of infection, with satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcome.
This second-stage reconstruction after retention of the stem could be an alternative treatment option for periprosthetic infection with a well-fixed stem.
两阶段重建术(即感染假体去除后再植入)被认为是治疗感染性髋关节置换术的金标准。然而,在去除固定良好的股骨柄时,近端股骨可能会受损并形成死骨,这可能导致慢性骨髓炎和再植入困难。我们想确定在不取出固定良好的股骨柄的情况下是否可以治疗髋关节置换术后的感染。
我们对 19 例髋关节置换术后感染但固定良好的非骨水泥柄患者采用两阶段重建术进行治疗。第一阶段,我们取出髋臼杯、衬垫和股骨头,但不取出柄。然后我们植入一个水泥间隔杯。感染得到控制后,我们重新植入髋臼部件和股骨头。
2 例患者因对植入水泥间隔杯后的疼痛缓解和活动度满意而未行二期重建。其余 17 例患者采用非骨水泥关节置换术进行了二期重建。平均随访 4(2-8)年,15 例患者无感染复发,临床和影像学结果满意。
保留股骨柄的二期重建术可能是治疗固定良好的假体周围感染的一种替代治疗选择。