Nobuyuki Katakami, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe; Koji Oda, Aichi Cancer Center, Aichi; Katsunori Tauchi, Aizawa Hospital, Nagano; Ken Nakata, Sakai City Medical Center; Takaaki Yokota and Yura Suzuki, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka; Katsunori Shinozaki, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima; Masaru Narabayashi, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research; and Narikazu Boku, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1921-1928. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.8453. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Purpose This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study aimed to determine the dose of naldemedine, a peripherally-acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, for future trials by comparing the efficacy and safety of three doses of naldemedine versus placebo in patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years old with cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, who had been receiving a stable regimen of opioid analgesics for ≥ 2 weeks, had at least one constipation symptom despite laxative use, and no more than five spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) during the past 14 days, were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to oral, once-daily naldemedine 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg, or placebo, for 14 days. The primary end point was change in SBM frequency per week from baseline during the treatment period. Secondary end points included SBM responder rates, change from baseline in the frequency of SBM without straining, and complete SBM. Safety was also assessed. Results Of 227 patients who were randomly assigned, 225 were assessed for efficacy (naldemedine 0.1 mg, n = 55; 0.2 mg, n = 58; 0.4 mg, n = 56; placebo, n = 56) and 226 for safety. Change in SBM frequency (primary end point) was higher with all naldemedine doses versus placebo ( P < .05 for all comparisons), as were SBM responder rates and change in complete SBM frequency. Change in SBM frequency without straining was significantly improved with naldemedine 0.2 and 0.4 (but not 0.1) mg versus placebo (at least P < .05). Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common with naldemedine (0.1 mg: 66.1%; 0.2 mg: 67.2%; 0.4 mg: 78.6%) than placebo (51.8%); the most common treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea. Conclusion Fourteen-day treatment with naldemedine significantly improved opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer and was generally well tolerated. Naldemedine 0.2 mg was selected for phase III studies.
这项随机、双盲、多中心研究旨在确定外周作用μ-阿片受体拮抗剂纳洛美丁的剂量,通过比较纳洛美丁三种剂量与安慰剂在癌症合并阿片类药物诱导性便秘患者中的疗效和安全性,来确定未来试验的剂量。
纳入年龄≥18 岁、东部肿瘤协作组体力状态评分≤2 分、接受稳定的阿片类镇痛药治疗≥2 周、尽管使用了泻药仍存在至少 1 种便秘症状且在过去 14 天内排便次数不超过 5 次的癌症患者,按 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配至口服、每日 1 次纳洛美丁 0.1、0.2 或 0.4mg 或安慰剂,治疗 14 天。主要终点为治疗期间每周 SBM 频率的变化。次要终点包括 SBM 应答率、SBM 无用力排便频率的变化和完全 SBM。还评估了安全性。
227 例随机患者中,225 例进行了疗效评估(纳洛美丁 0.1mg:55 例;0.2mg:58 例;0.4mg:56 例;安慰剂:56 例),226 例进行了安全性评估。与安慰剂相比,所有纳洛美丁剂量均能显著提高 SBM 频率(主要终点,P<.05),SBM 应答率和完全 SBM 频率的变化也均有提高。与安慰剂相比,纳洛美丁 0.2 和 0.4(而非 0.1)mg 能显著改善 SBM 无用力排便频率(至少 P<.05)。纳洛美丁(0.1mg:66.1%;0.2mg:67.2%;0.4mg:78.6%)治疗期间的不良事件发生率高于安慰剂(51.8%);最常见的治疗期间不良事件为腹泻。
纳洛美丁治疗 14 天可显著改善癌症患者的阿片类药物诱导性便秘,且总体耐受性良好。纳洛美丁 0.2mg 被选入 III 期研究。