Doodnaught Graeme M, Monteiro Beatriz P, Benito Javier, Edge Daniel, Beaudry Francis, Pelligand Ludovic, Steagall Paulo
Département de Sciences Cliniques, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.
Groupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animal du Québec (GREPAQ), Département de Biomédecine Vétérinaire, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0176443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176443. eCollection 2017.
The aim of this study was to describe the joint pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model and evaluate thermal antinociception of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine (Simbadol™) in cats.
Six healthy cats (4.9 ± 0.7 kg) were included in a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Simbadol™ (1.8 mg mL-1) was administered by the subcutaneous (SC; 0.24 mg kg-1), intravenous (IV; 0.12 mg kg-1) or buccal (OTM; 0.12 mg kg-1) route of administration and thermal thresholds (TT) were compared with a saline group (SAL). Thermal threshold testing and blood sampling were performed at predetermined time points up to 72 hours including a placebo group. Plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. A bespoke bicompartmental pharmacokinetic model simultaneously fitted data from two analytes/three routes of administration. Temporal changes in TT were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test and treatment comparisons using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's correction (P < 0.05).
Thermal thresholds were significantly increased after SC, IV and OTM from 1-24 hours (except 2 hours), 0.5-8 hours (except 6 hours), and 1-8 hours (except 6 hours), respectively, when compared with baseline. Thermal thresholds were significantly increased after SC (1-30 hours), IV (1-8 hours) and OTM (1-12 hours) when compared with SAL, but not different among buprenorphine-treated cats. The absolute buprenorphine clearance was 0.98 L kg-1 hour-1, volume of distribution at steady state was 7.9 L kg-1 and the elimination-half-life was 12.3 hours. Bioavailability for SC and OTM was 94% and 24%, respectively. Subcutaneous absorption was biphasic. An initial peak (0.08 hours) was followed by a slow (half-life 11.2 hours) and progressive (peak acceleration at 2.8 hours) uptake.
The SC administration of Simbadol™ was characterized by prolonged absorption half-life and sustained plasma concentrations yielding long-lasting antinociception (≥ 24 hours) when compared with the IV and OTM routes.
本研究旨在描述联合药代动力学-药效学模型,并评估高浓度丁丙诺啡制剂(Simbadol™)对猫的热镇痛作用。
六只健康猫(4.9±0.7千克)被纳入一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉研究。通过皮下(SC;0.24毫克/千克)、静脉(IV;0.12毫克/千克)或口腔黏膜(OTM;0.12毫克/千克)给药途径给予Simbadol™,并将热阈值(TT)与生理盐水组(SAL)进行比较。在包括安慰剂组在内的预定时间点(长达72小时)进行热阈值测试和采血。使用液相色谱质谱法测量血浆丁丙诺啡和去甲丁丙诺啡浓度。一个定制的双室药代动力学模型同时拟合来自两种分析物/三种给药途径的数据。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)随后进行Dunnett检验分析TT随时间的变化,并使用带有Bonferroni校正的双向方差分析(P<0.05)进行治疗组间比较。
与基线相比,SC、IV和OTM给药后,热阈值分别在1至24小时(2小时除外)、0.5至8小时(6小时除外)和1至8小时(6小时除外)显著升高。与SAL组相比,SC(1至30小时)、IV(1至8小时)和OTM(1至12小时)给药后热阈值显著升高,但在丁丙诺啡治疗的猫之间无差异。丁丙诺啡的绝对清除率为0.98升/千克·小时-1,稳态分布容积为7.9升/千克,消除半衰期为12.3小时。SC和OTM的生物利用度分别为94%和24%。皮下吸收是双相的。初始峰值(0.08小时)后是缓慢(半衰期11.2小时)且渐进的(2.8小时达到峰值加速)吸收。
与IV和OTM给药途径相比,Simbadol™皮下给药的特点是吸收半衰期延长,血浆浓度持续,产生持久的镇痛作用(≥24小时)。