Zhang Ning, Zhang Hanwen, Chen Tong, Yang Qifeng
Department of Breast Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Pathology Tissue Bank, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 11;8(15):24579-24592. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15597.
Invasive apocrine adenocarcinoma (AAC) of breast is a rare histopathological subtype of breast carcinomas. We aim to investigate the different characteristics and prognostic outcomes between AAC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of breast cancer.
AAC patients presented with older ages, more aggressive behaviors, lower ER and PR proportions, higher HER2 amplification rates and less application of breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy compared to IDC patients. Long-term OS and DSS were both worse in ACC patients (p = 0.006, p = 0.012 respectively) than in IDC patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, no significant difference was detected in DSS (p = 0.181) and OS (p = 0.116) between the matched two histological subtypes. Further subgroup analysis indicated that AJCC stage, ER status, PR status and HER2 status may be principal confounders for AAC prognosis.
With accession to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) database, a total of 260,596 patients met the eligibility criteria. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between groups using Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Subgroup analyses summarized the hazard ratio (HR) of AAC versus IDC using a forest plot.
AAC had unique clinicopathological characteristics and it tended to be a more aggressive type than IDC. However, the worse prognosis was diminished after matching for demographic and clinicopathological factors. Deeper insights into AAC are in need to contribute to individualized and tailored therapy, which thereby may improve clinical management and outcomes.
乳腺浸润性大汗腺癌(AAC)是乳腺癌一种罕见的组织病理学亚型。我们旨在研究AAC与乳腺浸润性导管癌(IDC)之间不同的特征和预后结果。
与IDC患者相比,AAC患者年龄更大,行为更具侵袭性,雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)比例更低,人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)扩增率更高,保乳治疗和辅助化疗的应用更少。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,AAC患者的长期总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)均比IDC患者差(分别为p = 0.006,p = 0.012)。然而,在匹配的两种组织学亚型之间,未检测到DSS(p = 0.181)和OS(p = 0.116)的显著差异。进一步的亚组分析表明,美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期、ER状态、PR状态和HER2状态可能是AAC预后的主要混杂因素。
通过访问监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,共有260596例患者符合纳入标准。使用卡方检验比较组间的临床病理特征。应用单因素和多因素分析来评估总生存期(OS)和疾病特异性生存期(DSS)。亚组分析使用森林图总结了AAC与IDC的风险比(HR)。
AAC具有独特的临床病理特征,且往往比IDC更具侵袭性。然而,在匹配人口统计学和临床病理因素后,较差的预后有所减轻。需要对AAC有更深入的了解,以促进个体化和针对性治疗,从而改善临床管理和治疗结果。