Department of Breast Surgery, International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
J BUON. 2021 Sep-Oct;26(5):1991-2002.
To investigate the difference of clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis between invasive papillary carcinoma (IPC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in breast cancer patients, and to further confirm the influence of molecular subtype on prognosis of IPC.
A total of 158,132 eligible patients from 2010 to 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, of which 348 patients were IPC and 157,784 patients were IDC. We assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular subtypes and prognostic value of IPC and compared them with those of IDC.
IPC was more frequently presented with older age at diagnosis, less proportion of married and white race, lower grade, smaller tumor size, higher rates of negative nodal status, more AJCC stage I disease and HR+/Her2- breast cancer, and was less likely to be treated with mastectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy than IDC (p<0.05). IPC had a better 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) rates than IDC. After adjusting confounding and matching the confounding factors, IPC patients were still associated with better BCSS. Regarding patients with specific subtypes, patients with IPC had more HR+/Her2- subtypes. In addition, HR+/Her2--IPC patients had a better BCSS than HR+/Her2--IDC patients, but OS was similar between the two groups. However, BCSS and OS did not differ in the two groups after matching the confounding factors. Subgroup analysis indicated that molecular subtype may be the main confounding factor in IPC prognosis.
IPC showed more favorable behavior than IDC, but prognosis was not as favorable as people once thought. The determination of the appropriate therapeutic regimen for IPC still needs to be made according to risk factors such as histological grade, pathological stage and molecular subtype.
研究乳腺癌患者浸润性乳头状癌(IPC)和浸润性导管癌(IDC)的临床病理特征和预后差异,并进一步证实分子亚型对 IPC 预后的影响。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中筛选了 2010 年至 2015 年期间的 158132 名符合条件的患者,其中 348 名为 IPC 患者,157784 名为 IDC 患者。我们评估了 IPC 的临床病理特征、分子亚型及其预后价值,并与 IDC 进行了比较。
IPC 患者诊断时年龄较大、已婚和白人比例较低、分级较低、肿瘤体积较小、淋巴结阴性率较高、AJCC Ⅰ期疾病比例较高、HR+/Her2-乳腺癌比例较高,且接受乳房切除术、化疗和放疗的比例低于 IDC(p<0.05)。IPC 的 5 年乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)和总生存率(OS)均优于 IDC。调整混杂因素并匹配混杂因素后,IPC 患者仍与更好的 BCSS 相关。对于特定亚型的患者,IPC 患者具有更多的 HR+/Her2-亚型。此外,HR+/Her2--IPC 患者的 BCSS 优于 HR+/Her2--IDC 患者,但两组之间的 OS 相似。然而,在匹配混杂因素后,两组之间的 BCSS 和 OS 没有差异。亚组分析表明,分子亚型可能是 IPC 预后的主要混杂因素。
IPC 的表现优于 IDC,但预后并不像人们曾经认为的那样乐观。对于 IPC,仍需根据组织学分级、病理分期和分子亚型等危险因素来确定合适的治疗方案。