Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理对链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病大鼠和非糖尿病大鼠缺血后心律失常的缓解作用存在差异。

Remote ischemic preconditioning differentially attenuates post-ischemic cardiac arrhythmia in streptozotocin-induced diabetic versus nondiabetic rats.

作者信息

Hu Zhaoyang, Chen Mou, Zhang Ping, Liu Jin, Abbott Geoffrey W

机构信息

Laboratory of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Bioelectricity Laboratory, Dept. of Pharmacology and Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Apr 26;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0537-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac death (SCD), a leading cause of global mortality, most commonly arises from a substrate of cardiac ischemia, but requires an additional trigger. Diabetes mellitus (DM) predisposes to SCD even after adjusting for other DM-linked cardiovascular pathology such as coronary artery disease. We previously showed that remote liver ischemia preconditioning (RLIPC) is highly protective against cardiac ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) linked ventricular arrhythmias and myocardial infarction, via induction of the cardioprotective RISK pathway, and specifically, inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK-3β (Ser 9).

METHODS

We evaluated the impact of acute streptozotocin-induced DM on coronary artery ligation IRI-linked ventricular arrhythmogenesis and RLIPC therapy in rats.

RESULTS

Post-IRI arrhythmia induction was similar in nondiabetic and DM rats, but, unexpectedly, DM rats exhibited lower incidence of SCD during reperfusion (41 vs. 100%), suggesting uncontrolled hyperglycemia does not acutely predispose to SCD. RLIPC was highly effective in both nondiabetic and DM rats at reducing incidence and duration of, and increasing latency to, all classes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In contrast, atrioventricular block (AVB) was highly responsive to RLIPC in nondiabetic rats (incidence reduced from 72 to 18%) but unresponsive in DM rats. RISK pathway induction was similar in nondiabetic and DM rats, thus not explaining the DM-specific resistance of AVB to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings uncover important acute DM-specific differences in responsiveness to remote preconditioning for ventricular tachyarrhythmias versus AVB, which may have clinical significance given that AVB is a malignant arrhythmia twofold more common in human diabetics than nondiabetics, and correlated to plasma glucose levels >10 mmol/L.

摘要

背景

心源性猝死(SCD)是全球死亡的主要原因,最常见于心脏缺血的基础上,但还需要一个额外的触发因素。即使在调整了其他与糖尿病相关的心血管病变(如冠状动脉疾病)后,糖尿病(DM)仍易引发SCD。我们之前表明,远程肝脏缺血预处理(RLIPC)通过诱导心脏保护的RISK途径,特别是抑制糖原合成酶激酶-3β(Ser 9)的磷酸化,对与心脏缺血再灌注损伤(IRI)相关的室性心律失常和心肌梗死具有高度保护作用。

方法

我们评估了急性链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病对大鼠冠状动脉结扎IRI相关室性心律失常发生及RLIPC治疗的影响。

结果

IRI后心律失常的诱导在非糖尿病和糖尿病大鼠中相似,但出乎意料的是,糖尿病大鼠在再灌注期间SCD的发生率较低(41%对100%),这表明未控制的高血糖不会急性易患SCD。RLIPC在非糖尿病和糖尿病大鼠中均能有效降低各类室性快速性心律失常的发生率和持续时间,并增加其发生延迟。相比之下,房室传导阻滞(AVB)在非糖尿病大鼠中对RLIPC高度敏感(发生率从72%降至18%),但在糖尿病大鼠中无反应。非糖尿病和糖尿病大鼠中RISK途径诱导相似,因此无法解释AVB对治疗的糖尿病特异性抵抗。

结论

我们的研究结果揭示了糖尿病患者对远程预处理治疗室性快速性心律失常与AVB反应的重要急性特异性差异,鉴于AVB是一种恶性心律失常,在人类糖尿病患者中比非糖尿病患者常见两倍,且与血糖水平>10 mmol/L相关,这可能具有临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32ae/5406986/b31cf7ad39ec/12933_2017_537_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验