• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Medicine alone or combined with carotid revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄:单纯药物治疗还是联合颈动脉血运重建术。
Neurology. 2017 May 23;88(21):2061-2065. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003956. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
Clinical need, design, and goals for the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis trial.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉血运重建与药物治疗试验的临床需求、设计及目标
Semin Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;30(1):2-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Issues to Be Addressed and Hopefully Resolved in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial 2.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验2中有待解决并有望得到解决的问题
Angiology. 2016 May;67(5):408-10. doi: 10.1177/0003319715611281. Epub 2015 Oct 11.
4
Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Revascularization.无症状性颈动脉狭窄:血运重建
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 May-Jun;59(6):591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 May 3.
5
Carotid endarterectomy plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone for carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic or asymptomatic patients: a meta-analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗用于症状性或无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者:一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):835-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.01.044. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
6
Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Protocol of the CREST-2 clinical trials.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉血运重建与药物治疗:CREST-2临床试验方案
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(7):770-778. doi: 10.1177/1747493017706238. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Management strategies for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无症状颈动脉狭窄的管理策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 7;158(9):676-685. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00007.
8
Which is a better treatment for carotid artery stenosis: stenting or endarterectomy?颈动脉狭窄的治疗中,支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术哪个更好?
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Apr;17(8):1025-32.
9
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
10
Early outcomes after carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的早期疗效比较。
Stroke. 2015 Jan;46(1):120-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006209. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid DSA based CFD simulation in assessing the patient with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a preliminary study.基于颈动脉 DSA 的 CFD 模拟在评估无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者中的初步研究。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Mar 12;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0465-9.
2
One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field.一燕不成夏,但众燕可为之:越来越多的临床证据表明,使用覆膜支架几乎消除了围手术期和30天并发症,这改变了颈动脉血管重建领域。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(2):95-106. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2017.69012. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Endarterectomy, Stenting, or Neither for Asymptomatic Carotid-Artery Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术、支架置入术或两者皆不采用
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1087-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1600123. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
2
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的长期结果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1021-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Stroke/Death Rates Following Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Contemporary Administrative Dataset Registries: A Systematic Review.当代行政数据集登记处中颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术之后的中风/死亡率:一项系统评价
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.032. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2015年美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会对2013年急性缺血性卒中患者早期管理指南中血管内治疗部分的重点更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会给医疗专业人员的指南
Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):3020-35. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000074. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke.发病 8 小时内进行缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
7
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.血管内溶栓联合支架取栓与单纯静脉溶栓治疗脑卒中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke.随机评估缺血性脑卒中的血管内治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
9
Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection.血管内治疗缺血性卒中的灌注成像选择。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414792. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
10
A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的动脉内治疗随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

无症状性颈动脉狭窄:单纯药物治疗还是联合颈动脉血运重建术。

Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Medicine alone or combined with carotid revascularization.

作者信息

Heck Donald V, Roubin Gary S, Rosenfield Kenneth G, Gray William A, White Christopher J, Jovin Tudor G, Matsumura Jon S, Lal Brajesh K, Katzen Barry T, Dabus Guilherme, Jankowitz Brian T, Brott Thomas G

机构信息

From the Novant Health Forsyth Comprehensive Stroke Center (D.V.H.), Winston Salem, NC; Cardiovascular Associates of the Southeast (G.S.R.), Birmingham, AL; Massachusetts General Hospital (K.G.R.), Boston; Main Line Health System/Lankenau Heart Institute (W.A.G.), Wynnewood, PA; Ochsner Medical Institutions (C.J.W.), New Orleans, LA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (T.G.J., B.T.J.), PA; University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health (J.S.M.), Madison; University of Maryland Medical Center (B.K.L.), Baltimore, MD; Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute (B.T.K., G.D.); and Mayo Clinic (T.G.B.), Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Neurology. 2017 May 23;88(21):2061-2065. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003956. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003956
PMID:28446652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5440242/
Abstract

Two positive randomized trials established carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as a superior treatment to medical management alone for the treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, advances in medical therapy have led to an active and spirited debate about the best treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CREST 2) trial aims to better define the best treatment for the average patient with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Enrollment in the trial may be hampered by strong opinions on either side of the debate. It is important to realize that equipoise exists and that neither the old data on CEA nor the new data on optimal medical therapy provide a rigorous answer. The assumption that medical therapy has already been proven superior to revascularization procedures may hinder both enrollment in the trial and technical advancements in revascularization procedures.

摘要

两项阳性随机试验证实,对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄的治疗,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)优于单纯药物治疗。然而,药物治疗的进展引发了一场关于无症状性颈动脉狭窄最佳治疗方法的激烈且活跃的辩论。无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉血运重建与药物治疗(CREST 2)试验旨在更好地确定重度无症状性颈动脉狭窄普通患者的最佳治疗方法。该试验的入组可能会受到辩论双方强烈观点的阻碍。重要的是要认识到存在均衡状态,而且关于CEA的旧数据和关于最佳药物治疗的新数据都没有提供严格的答案。认为药物治疗已被证明优于血运重建手术的假设可能会阻碍试验入组以及血运重建手术的技术进步。