• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验和流行病学研究的高效设计:是否可行?

Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible?

机构信息

National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research, One Center Drive, Building 1, Room 144, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 8th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Aug;14(8):493-501. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.60. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1038/nrcardio.2017.60
PMID:28447664
Abstract

Randomized clinical trials and large-scale, cohort studies continue to have a critical role in generating evidence in cardiovascular medicine; however, the increasing concern is that ballooning costs threaten the clinical trial enterprise. In this Perspectives article, we discuss the changing landscape of clinical research, and clinical trials in particular, focusing on reasons for the increasing costs and inefficiencies. These reasons include excessively complex design, overly restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria, burdensome regulations, excessive source-data verification, and concerns about the effect of clinical research conduct on workflow. Thought leaders have called on the clinical research community to consider alternative, transformative business models, including those models that focus on simplicity and leveraging of digital resources. We present some examples of innovative approaches by which some investigators have successfully conducted large-scale, clinical trials at relatively low cost. These examples include randomized registry trials, cluster-randomized trials, adaptive trials, and trials that are fully embedded within digital clinical care or administrative platforms.

摘要

随机临床试验和大规模队列研究继续在心血管医学领域产生重要证据;然而,人们越来越担心的是,不断膨胀的成本威胁着临床试验事业。在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了临床研究,特别是临床试验不断变化的格局,重点探讨了成本不断增加和效率低下的原因。这些原因包括设计过于复杂、纳入和排除标准过于严格、监管负担过重、过度的数据来源验证,以及对临床研究实施对工作流程影响的担忧。思想领袖呼吁临床研究界考虑替代的、变革性的商业模式,包括那些专注于简化和利用数字资源的商业模式。我们介绍了一些创新方法的示例,一些研究人员通过这些方法成功地以相对较低的成本进行了大规模临床试验。这些示例包括随机登记试验、整群随机试验、适应性试验,以及完全嵌入数字临床护理或行政平台的试验。

相似文献

1
Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible?临床试验和流行病学研究的高效设计:是否可行?
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Aug;14(8):493-501. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.60. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
2
Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials.随机试验实施的特定障碍。
Clin Trials. 2008;5(1):40-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774507087704.
3
The Changing Landscape of Randomized Clinical Trials in Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病随机临床试验的变化格局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 25;68(17):1898-1907. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.781.
4
Efficient use of endpoints in clinical trials: a clinical perspective.临床试验中终点指标的有效应用:临床视角
Stat Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):155-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780090122.
5
Cluster randomized trials: another problem for cost-effectiveness ratios.整群随机试验:成本效益比的另一个问题。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Summer;21(3):403-9. doi: 10.1017/s0266462305050531.
6
Costs of care in a mild-to-moderate Alzheimer clinical trial sample: key resources and their determinants.轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病临床试验样本中的护理成本:关键资源及其决定因素。
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Jul;7(4):466-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.06.002.
7
Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size.实施研究中的整群试验:组内相关系数的估计与样本量
Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):391-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<391::aid-sim800>3.0.co;2-z.
8
Cluster randomized trials: opportunities and barriers identified by leaders of eight health plans.整群随机试验:八项健康计划的负责人所确定的机遇与障碍
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S29-37. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806728c4.
9
Transforming the scientific, health care, and sociopolitical culture of an entire country through clinical research: the story of GISSI.通过临床研究转变整个国家的科学、医疗保健和社会政治文化:GISSI的故事。
Am Heart J. 2004 Aug;148(2):193-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.056.
10
Non-inferiority study design: lessons to be learned from cardiovascular trials.非劣效性研究设计:心血管试验的经验教训。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs099. Epub 2012 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a conceptual framework for defining trial efficiency.定义试验效率的概念框架的发展。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0304187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304187. eCollection 2024.
2
Clinical data mining: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for translational applications.临床数据挖掘:转化应用的挑战、机遇和建议。
J Transl Med. 2024 Feb 20;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05005-0.
3
Long-term health outcomes for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: placing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report in context-a multisociety commentary.

本文引用的文献

1
How economics can shape precision medicines.经济学如何塑造精准药物。
Science. 2017 Mar 17;355(6330):1131-1133. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8707. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Transforming Evidence Generation to Support Health and Health Care Decisions.转化证据生成以支持健康及医疗保健决策。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2395-2400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1610128.
3
NIH Policy on Single-IRB Review - A New Era in Multicenter Studies.美国国立卫生研究院单独立伦理审查委员会审查政策——多中心研究的新时代。
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的长期健康结局:从多学会角度解读医疗保健研究与质量局报告
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):135-149. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10832.
4
National Institutes of Health research project grant inflation 1998 to 2021.1998 年至 2021 年期间,美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助膨胀。
Elife. 2023 Feb 10;12:e84245. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84245.
5
Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?基于注册的随机临床试验:一种改善循证糖尿病治疗的方法?
Diabetologia. 2022 Oct;65(10):1575-1586. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05762-x. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
6
Women's Health Initiative Strong and Healthy (WHISH): A pragmatic physical activity intervention trial for cardiovascular disease prevention.妇女健康倡议强壮与健康(WHISH):一项针对心血管疾病预防的实用体力活动干预试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106815. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106815. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
Pragmatic Clinical Studies: An Emerging Clinical Research Discipline for Improving Evidence-Based Practice of Cardiovascular Diseases in Asia.实用临床研究:亚洲改善心血管疾病循证实践的新兴临床研究学科。
Korean Circ J. 2022 Jun;52(6):401-413. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0100.
8
Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS).可可补充剂与多种维生素结果研究(COSMOS)参与者的设计与基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106728. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106728. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
9
The SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin in heart failure: the CHIEF-HF remote, patient-centered randomized trial.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂卡格列净治疗心力衰竭:CHIEF-HF 远程、以患者为中心的随机试验。
Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):809-813. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01703-8. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
Zelen design clinical trials: why, when, and how.泽伦设计临床试验:为何、何时以及如何。
Trials. 2021 Aug 17;22(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05517-w.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2315-2317. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608766.
4
Effect of Short-Term vs. Long-Term Blood Storage on Mortality after Transfusion.短期与长期血液储存对输血后死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1937-1945. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609014. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials.迈向临床试验信任与透明的新时代。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1353-1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14668.
6
Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov - The Final Rule.ClinicalTrials.gov 中的试验报告 - 最终规则。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1998-2004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1611785. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.迈向数据共享中的公平性。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):405-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605654.
8
The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project--A Mechanism for Data Sharing.耶鲁开放数据访问(YODA)项目——一种数据共享机制。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):403-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607342.
9
Strengthening Research through Data Sharing.通过数据共享加强研究。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):401-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607282.
10
NIH tackles clinical trial shortcomings.美国国立卫生研究院解决临床试验的不足之处。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 May 3;15(5):297-8. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.87.