Suppr超能文献

治疗骨质疏松症药物成本效益的临床评估:一项荟萃分析。

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF COST EFFICACY OF DRUGS FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS: A META-ANALYSIS.

作者信息

Albert Stewart G, Reddy Supraja

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2017 Jul;23(7):841-856. doi: 10.4158/EP161678.RA. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost efficacy of available regimens for therapy of osteoporosis as defined as the cost time's number need to treat to prevent one fracture.

METHODS

Existing meta-analyses were supplemented through electronic databases SCOPUS and PubMed between 2013 (a date overlapping the latest meta-analyses) and March 2016. Primary references included all randomized controlled trials of anti-osteoporotic drugs versus comparators using search terms "osteoporosis," "random," and "trial."

RESULTS

There were 43 evaluable randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in 71,809 postmenopausal women comparing fracture frequency. Trials were similar in recruitment age (mean ± SD, 67.3 ± 8.1 years) and follow-up duration (25.5 ± 12.6 months). Cost comparisons were evaluated for a treatment strategy assuming generic alendronate as first-line therapy. Denosumab and teriparatide showed benefits in vertebral fracture reduction over alendronate at incremental costs respectively of $46,000 and $455,000 per fracture prevented. Zoledronate, recently released as a generic, would be either less expensive or comparable in cost. None of the alternate medicines were statistically better in preventing hip fractures. Teriparatide was more effective in preventing nonvertebral fractures at an incremental cost of $1,555,000.

CONCLUSION

The most cost-effective initial therapy of postmenopausal osteoporosis is generic oral alendronate or generic parenteral zoledronate. There is no statistically significant difference in efficacy of available drugs to prevent hip fractures. There are limited data to suggest switching drugs after sustaining an osteoporotic fracture while on oral alendronate therapy, although generic zoledronate may be considered on the basis of side effects or questions of medication adherence.

ABBREVIATIONS

ALN = alendronate; DEN = denosumab; IBN = ibandronate; NNT = number needed to treat; OR = odds ratio; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RIS = risedronate; RLN = raloxifene; TER = teriparatide; ZOL = zoledronate.

摘要

目的

评估现有骨质疏松症治疗方案的成本效益,其定义为预防一次骨折所需治疗的成本-时间治疗人数。

方法

通过电子数据库SCOPUS和PubMed对2013年(与最新的荟萃分析有重叠日期)至2016年3月期间的现有荟萃分析进行补充。主要参考文献包括所有使用搜索词“骨质疏松症”“随机”和“试验”的抗骨质疏松药物与对照药物的随机对照试验。

结果

在71809名绝经后女性中,有43项可评估的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验比较了骨折发生率。试验在招募年龄(平均±标准差,67.3±8.1岁)和随访时间(25.5±12.6个月)方面相似。对一种以普通阿仑膦酸钠作为一线治疗的治疗策略进行了成本比较。地诺单抗和特立帕肽在降低椎体骨折方面比阿仑膦酸钠更具优势,每预防一例骨折的增量成本分别为46000美元和455000美元。最近作为非专利药上市的唑来膦酸成本更低或相当。在预防髋部骨折方面,其他药物在统计学上均无更好效果。特立帕肽在预防非椎体骨折方面更有效,增量成本为1555000美元。

结论

绝经后骨质疏松症最具成本效益的初始治疗药物是普通口服阿仑膦酸钠或普通静脉注射唑来膦酸。现有药物在预防髋部骨折的疗效上无统计学显著差异。在口服阿仑膦酸钠治疗期间发生骨质疏松性骨折后换药的数据有限,不过可根据副作用或用药依从性问题考虑使用普通唑来膦酸。

缩略词

ALN = 阿仑膦酸钠;DEN = 地诺单抗;IBN = 伊班膦酸钠;NNT = 治疗人数;OR = 比值比;RCT = 随机对照试验;RIS = 利塞膦酸钠;RLN = 雷洛昔芬;TER = 特立帕肽;ZOL = 唑来膦酸

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验