• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于非转移性甲状腺乳头状癌患者的新临床严重程度分期系统。

Development of a New Clinical Severity Staging System for Patients With Nonmetastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

机构信息

University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 1;143(12):1173-1180. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0550.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0550
PMID:28449113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5824303/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The inclusion of patient features in addition to tumor morphology provides a more holistic staging system.

OBJECTIVE

To identify prognostically important variables in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) to incorporate into a comprehensive functional severity staging system (FSSS) and clinical severity staging system (CSSS) and to validate the model using a multi-institutional database.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of adults 18 years or older newly diagnosed or treated for nonmetastatic PTC at the Siteman Cancer Center from 1995 through 2012. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the association between 5-year survival and age, comorbidities, and tumor morphologic features. Conjunctive consolidation was used to create staging systems that incorporated important patient and tumor information. The created FSSS and CSSS were compared with the current AJCC staging system and externally validated using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Five-year survival.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 774 eligible patients with PTC. There were 119 (15%) deaths in the cohort and a 90% 5-year survival rate. The median age of the patients was 51 years (range, 18-91); 562 (73%) were women. Conjunctive consolidation combined age, comorbidity, and T stage to create a new CSSS with 3 categories where 5-year survival rates (95% CI) were as follows: stage A (n = 612), 95% (94%-97%); stage B (n = 131), 74% (67%-82%); and stage C (n = 31), 58% (41%-75%). The performance of the FSSS and CSSS was validated using the NCDB data. The new staging system indicates that patients with nonmetastatic disease, patients younger than 40 years, or patients without comorbidity regardless of age have a very high 5-year survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The FSSS and CSSS had better predictive results than the current AJCC staging system. The addition of patient features to tumor morphology provides a more comprehensive staging system that improves prognostic accuracy. These comprehensive staging systems can improve scientific reporting of disease outcomes, support comparative effectiveness studies, and guide clinical care by defining prognosis for newly diagnosed patients.

摘要

重要性

除肿瘤形态外,纳入患者特征可提供更全面的分期系统。

目的

确定甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)中具有预后意义的变量,以纳入综合功能严重程度分期系统(FSSS)和临床严重程度分期系统(CSSS),并使用多机构数据库验证该模型。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1995 年至 2012 年在 Siteman 癌症中心新诊断或治疗非转移性 PTC 的 18 岁及以上成年人。采用二元逻辑回归探讨 5 年生存率与年龄、合并症和肿瘤形态特征之间的关系。联合巩固用于创建纳入重要患者和肿瘤信息的分期系统。创建的 FSSS 和 CSSS 与当前 AJCC 分期系统进行比较,并使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)进行外部验证。

主要结局和测量

5 年生存率。

结果

该队列包括 774 例符合条件的 PTC 患者。队列中有 119 例(15%)死亡,90%的患者 5 年生存率为 90%。患者的中位年龄为 51 岁(范围为 18-91 岁);562 例(73%)为女性。联合巩固将年龄、合并症和 T 分期相结合,创建了一个新的 CSSS,有 3 个类别,5 年生存率(95%CI)如下:A 期(n=612),95%(94%-97%);B 期(n=131),74%(67%-82%);C 期(n=31),58%(41%-75%)。使用 NCDB 数据验证了 FSSS 和 CSSS 的性能。新的分期系统表明,患有非转移性疾病、年龄小于 40 岁或无合并症的患者(无论年龄大小),5 年生存率非常高。

结论和相关性

FSSS 和 CSSS 的预测结果优于现行 AJCC 分期系统。在肿瘤形态之外加入患者特征可提供更全面的分期系统,从而提高预后准确性。这些综合分期系统可以通过为新诊断患者定义预后来提高疾病结局的科学报告、支持有效性比较研究,并指导临床护理。

相似文献

1
Development of a New Clinical Severity Staging System for Patients With Nonmetastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.开发一种用于非转移性甲状腺乳头状癌患者的新临床严重程度分期系统。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 1;143(12):1173-1180. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0550.
2
Clinical features of poorly differentiated thyroid papillary carcinoma.低分化甲状腺乳头状癌的临床特征
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019 Jun;46(3):437-442. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
3
Appropriateness of the revised Japanese guidelines' risk classification for the prognosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 5,845 papillary thyroid carcinoma patients.日本修订版甲状腺乳头状癌预后风险分类的适宜性:对5845例甲状腺乳头状癌患者的回顾性分析
Endocr J. 2019 Feb 28;66(2):127-134. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0061. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
4
Mortality Risk of Nonoperative Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Corollary for Active Surveillance.非手术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的死亡率:主动监测的推论。
Thyroid. 2019 Oct;29(10):1409-1417. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0060. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
5
Upregulation of the solute carrier family 7 genes is indicative of poor prognosis in papillary thyroid carcinoma.溶质载体家族 7 基因的上调表明甲状腺乳头状癌的预后不良。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec 17;16(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1535-y.
6
Prognostic Parameters in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas.分化型甲状腺癌的预后参数
Surg Pathol Clin. 2019 Dec;12(4):883-900. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
7
Association of Lymph Node Density With Survival of Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.淋巴结密度与甲状腺乳头状癌患者生存的关系。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 1;144(2):108-114. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2416.
8
Total vs hemithyroidectomy for intermediate risk papillary thyroid cancer: A 23 year retrospective study in a tertiary center.全甲状腺切除术与甲状腺半切除术治疗中危甲状腺乳头状癌:一家三级中心 23 年回顾性研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 May-Jun;40(3):431-434. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
9
Recurrence following hemithyroidectomy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.低危和中危甲状腺乳头状癌患者行甲状腺腺叶切除术的复发情况。
Br J Surg. 2020 May;107(6):687-694. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11430. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Changes in total thyroidectomy versus thyroid lobectomy for papillary thyroid cancer during the past 15 years.过去 15 年甲状腺全切除术与甲状腺叶切除术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的变化。
Surgery. 2019 Jul;166(1):41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Telitacicept for systemic lupus erythematosus with post‑surgical papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case report.泰它西普治疗系统性红斑狼疮合并甲状腺乳头状癌术后:一例报告
Biomed Rep. 2025 Jan 19;22(3):48. doi: 10.3892/br.2025.1926. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Identifying Predictors of Treatment Response in Meniere's Disease: A Clinical Severity Staging System.鉴定梅尼埃病治疗反应的预测因子:临床严重程度分期系统。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan;170(1):212-220. doi: 10.1002/ohn.486. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Machine learning explainability in nasopharyngeal cancer survival using LIME and SHAP.基于 LIME 和 SHAP 的机器学习在鼻咽癌生存分析中的可解释性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 2;13(1):8984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35795-0.
4
An Integrative Multi-Omics Analysis of The Molecular Links between Aging and Aggressiveness in Thyroid Cancers.甲状腺癌中衰老与侵袭性之间分子联系的综合多组学分析
Aging Dis. 2023 Jun 1;14(3):992-1012. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.1021.
5
The number of metastatic lymph nodes optimizes staging in patients aged 55 years or older with papillary thyroid cancer.对于 55 岁及以上的甲状腺乳头状癌患者,转移淋巴结的数量可优化分期。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 9;13:1026737. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1026737. eCollection 2022.
6
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a population-based study.开发和验证一种列线图,用于预测老年甲状腺乳头状癌患者的癌症特异性生存:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Sep 8;22(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03430-8.
7
Cell migration inducing hyaluronidase 1 promotes growth and metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.细胞迁移诱导透明质酸酶 1 促进甲状腺乳头状癌的生长和转移。
Bioengineered. 2022 May;13(5):11822-11831. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2074110.
8
Competing Causes of Death in Older Adults with Thyroid Cancer.老年甲状腺癌患者的死亡竞争原因。
Thyroid. 2021 Sep;31(9):1359-1365. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0929. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
9
Overexpression of novel long intergenic non‑coding RNA LINC02454 is associated with a poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer.新型长链非编码 RNA LINC02454 的过表达与甲状腺乳头状癌的不良预后相关。
Oncol Rep. 2020 Oct;44(4):1489-1501. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7712. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
The relationship of comorbidities to mortality and cause of death in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.合并症与分化型甲状腺癌患者死亡率及死因的关系。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 7;9(1):11435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47898-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer.甲状腺癌的过度诊断。
BMJ. 2016 Nov 30;355:i6312. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6312.
2
Changing Trends in the Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the United States.美国甲状腺癌发病率的变化趋势
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jul 1;142(7):709-11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.0230.
3
Increasing diagnosis of subclinical thyroid cancers leads to spurious improvements in survival rates.亚临床甲状腺癌诊断率的提高导致生存率出现虚假改善。
Cancer. 2015 Jun 1;121(11):1793-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29289. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
4
Comparison of comorbidity collection methods.合并症收集方法的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Aug;219(2):245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.059. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
5
Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States.美国当前的甲状腺癌趋势。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr;140(4):317-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1.
6
The increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: the influence of access to care.甲状腺癌发病率的上升:医疗可及性的影响。
Thyroid. 2013 Jul;23(7):885-91. doi: 10.1089/thy.2013.0045. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
7
Comparison of Scoring Methods for ACE-27: Simpler Is Better.ACE-27评分方法的比较:越简单越好。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;3(3):238-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.01.006.
8
Thyroid cancer survival in the United States: observational data from 1973 to 2005.美国甲状腺癌患者的生存率:1973年至2005年的观察数据。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 May;136(5):440-4. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.55.
9
Overdiagnosis in cancer.癌症过度诊断。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq099. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
10
The occurrence of carcinoma of the thyroid gland in autopsy material.尸检材料中甲状腺癌的发生率。
N Engl J Med. 1947 Aug 14;237(7):221. doi: 10.1056/NEJM194708142370703.