Centre of Research in Childhood Health, Institute for Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
OPEN-Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jan;28(1):228-236. doi: 10.1111/sms.12902. Epub 2017 May 22.
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a school-based intervention with a tripling of physical education (PE) lessons from two (90 minutes) to six lessons per week (270 minutes) on scholastic performance. This study is part of the CHAMPS study-DK, a quasi-experimental study that began in 2008. The intervention group consisted of six schools, and the control group consisted of four matched schools (mean age at baseline=8.4 years, kindergarten class fourth grade). Academic performance was extracted from the national test system from 2010 to 2014 (Math and Danish were measured at third and sixth, and second, fourth and sixth grades, respectively). Participants included 1888 students participating in at least one scholastic performance test. Linear mixed models were applied to test for differences between groups and adjusted for known confounders. No significant differences were observed between groups in the academic performance tests (control group reference); Danish second grade β=-1.34 (95% CI -9.90, 7.22), fourth grade β=0.22 (95% CI -6.12, 6.56), sixth grade β=1.03 (95% CI -5.02, 7.08), and all grades combined β=0.28 (95% CI -5.74, 6.31) and Math third grade β=-2.87 (95% CI -9.65, 3.90), sixth grade β=0.99 (95% CI -7.36, 9.34) and combined β=-1.20 (95% CI -8.10, 5.71). In conclusion, no significant differences were observed between intervention and control schools for scholastic performance. Importantly, there were no negative effects of additional PE on scholastic outcomes, despite more PE and longer school days for intervention children.
本研究旨在探讨每周增加三次体育课(从两节增至六节,每节 90 分钟)对学业成绩的影响。本研究是 CHAMPS 研究-DK 的一部分,该研究为准实验研究,于 2008 年开始。干预组由六所学校组成,对照组由四所匹配学校组成(基线时的平均年龄为 8.4 岁,幼儿园至四年级)。学业成绩从 2010 年至 2014 年从全国考试系统中提取(数学和丹麦语分别在三年级和六年级以及二年级、四年级和六年级进行测量)。参与者包括至少参加一次学业成绩测试的 1888 名学生。应用线性混合模型检验组间差异,并对已知混杂因素进行调整。在学业成绩测试中,两组间未观察到显著差异(对照组参考);丹麦语二年级β=-1.34(95%CI-9.90,7.22),四年级β=0.22(95%CI-6.12,6.56),六年级β=1.03(95%CI-5.02,7.08),所有年级综合β=0.28(95%CI-5.74,6.31)和数学三年级β=-2.87(95%CI-9.65,3.90),六年级β=0.99(95%CI-7.36,9.34)和综合β=-1.20(95%CI-8.10,5.71)。总之,干预组和对照组学校在学业成绩方面没有显著差异。重要的是,尽管干预组儿童的体育课更多且在校时间更长,但对学业成绩没有负面影响。