Siegfried Nandi, Narasimhan Manjulaa, Kennedy Caitlin E, Welbourn Alice, Yuvraj Anandi
a Independent Clinical Epidemiologist , Cape Town , South Africa.
b Department of Reproductive Health and Research , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.
AIDS Care. 2017 Sep;29(9):1088-1093. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1317711. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
In March 2016, WHO reviewed evidence to develop global recommendations on the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of women living with HIV. Systematic reviews and a global survey of women living with HIV informed the guideline development decision-making process. New recommendations covered abortion, Caesarean section, safe disclosure, and empowerment and self-efficacy interventions. Identification of key research gaps is part of the WHO guidelines development process, but consistent methods to do so are lacking. Our method aimed to ensure consistency and comprised the systematic application of a framework based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to the process. The framework incorporates the strength and quality rating of recommendations and the priorities reported by women in the survey to inform research prioritisation. For each gap, we also articulated: (1) the most appropriate and robust study design to answer the question; (2) alternative pragmatic designs if the ideal design is not feasible; and (3) the methodological challenges facing researchers through identifying potential biases. We found 12 research gaps and identified five appropriate study designs to address the related questions: (1) Cross-sectional surveys; (2) Qualitative interview-driven studies; (3) Registries; (4) Randomised controlled trials; and (5) Medical record audit. Methodological challenges included selection, recruitment, misclassification, measurement and contextual biases, and confounding. In conclusion, a framework based on GRADE can provide a systematic approach to identifying research gaps from a WHO guideline. Incorporation of the priorities of women living with HIV into the framework systematically ensures that women living with HIV can shape future policy decisions affecting their lives. Implementation science and participatory research are appropriate over-arching approaches to enhance uptake of interventions and to ensure inclusion of women living with HIV at all stages of the research process.
2016年3月,世界卫生组织(WHO)审查了相关证据,以制定关于感染艾滋病毒女性的性与生殖健康及权利(SRHR)的全球建议。系统评价以及一项针对感染艾滋病毒女性的全球调查为指南制定的决策过程提供了依据。新的建议涵盖堕胎、剖腹产、安全披露以及赋权和自我效能干预措施。确定关键研究差距是WHO指南制定过程的一部分,但缺乏这样做的一致方法。我们的方法旨在确保一致性,包括将基于GRADE(建议分级、评估、制定和评价)的框架系统地应用于该过程。该框架纳入了建议的强度和质量评级以及调查中女性报告的优先事项,以为研究优先级提供信息。对于每个差距,我们还阐明了:(1)回答该问题最合适、最可靠的研究设计;(2)如果理想设计不可行的替代实用设计;(3)通过识别潜在偏差,研究人员面临的方法学挑战。我们发现了12个研究差距,并确定了5种合适的研究设计来解决相关问题:(1)横断面调查;(2)定性访谈驱动研究;(3)登记处;(4)随机对照试验;(5)病历审计。方法学挑战包括选择、招募、错误分类、测量和背景偏差以及混杂因素。总之,基于GRADE的框架可以提供一种系统方法,从WHO指南中识别研究差距。将感染艾滋病毒女性的优先事项纳入该框架可系统地确保感染艾滋病毒女性能够塑造影响其生活的未来政策决策。实施科学和参与性研究是适当的总体方法,可加强干预措施的采用,并确保在研究过程的各个阶段都纳入感染艾滋病毒女性。