Dehghan Niloofar, Schemitsch Emil H
Li Ka Shing Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Orthopaedic surgeon - The CORE Institute, Banner University Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Injury. 2017 Jun;48 Suppl 1:S41-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
Locked intramedullary fixation is a well-established technique for managing long-bone fractures. While intramedullary nail fixation of diaphyseal fractures in the femur, tibia, and humerus is well established, the same is not true for other fractures. Surgical fixations of clavicle, forearm and ankle are traditionally treated with plate and screw fixation. In some cases, fixation with an intramedullary device is possible, and may be advantageous. However, there is however a concern regarding a lack of rotational stability and fracture shortening. While new generation of locked intramedullary devices for fractures of clavicle, forearm and fibula are recently available, the outcomes are not as reliable as fixation with plates and screws. Further research in this area is warranted with high quality comparative studies, to investigate the outcomes and indication of these fractures treated with intramedullary nail devices compared to intramedullary nail fixation.
带锁髓内固定是治疗长骨骨折的一种成熟技术。虽然股骨干、胫骨干和肱骨干骨折的髓内钉固定已很成熟,但其他骨折并非如此。锁骨、前臂和踝关节的手术固定传统上采用钢板螺钉固定。在某些情况下,使用髓内装置固定是可行的,而且可能具有优势。然而,人们担心缺乏旋转稳定性和骨折短缩。虽然最近有新一代用于锁骨、前臂和腓骨骨折的带锁髓内装置,但结果不如钢板螺钉固定可靠。该领域需要通过高质量的对比研究进行进一步研究,以调查与髓内钉固定相比,使用髓内钉装置治疗这些骨折的结果和适应症。