Hux Vanessa J, Roberts James M, Okun Michele L
Magee-Womens Research Institute, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, USA.
Magee-Womens Research Institute, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Sleep Med. 2017 May;33:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
Allostatic load (AL) measures the cumulative impact of chronic stress and is associated with adverse health outcomes. A novel scoring system has previously been developed for AL in early pregnancy that is associated with pre-eclampsia. It was hypothesized that AL, as identified by the present model, is associated with psychosocial stressors and, specifically, poor sleep quality.
Women were selected from a low-risk, community-dwelling study population who enrolled at <15 weeks gestation. Nine physiologic components were divided among the domains of cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory function. Spearman's rank correlations were used to examine the association of AL with age, income, the Revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (NuPDQ), Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (IDS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare AL by race and educational attainment.
A total of 103 women were identified, with: a mean age of 29.8 ± 5.0 years, 17.5% black, and mean gestational age 12.2 ± 1.1 weeks. Allostatic load was positively correlated with the PSQI (ρ = 0.23, p = 0.018). There were no associations with age, income, prenatal distress, race, or depression scores. College-educated women had lower AL compared with those with less education (0.57 ± 0.43 vs 0.81 ± 0.55, p = 0.045).
Higher AL, measured by the pregnancy-specific model, was associated with poorer sleep quality and lower educational attainment, both of which were considered to be chronic stressors. These relationships were consistent with previous findings in non-pregnant populations, and suggest that AL may be useful for capturing the physiologic impact of chronic stress in early pregnancy.
应激负荷(AL)衡量慢性应激的累积影响,并与不良健康结局相关。先前已开发出一种针对孕早期应激负荷的新型评分系统,该系统与子痫前期相关。据推测,当前模型所确定的应激负荷与心理社会应激源相关,尤其是与睡眠质量差有关。
从妊娠<15周时入组的低风险社区居住研究人群中选取女性。九个生理成分分布在心血管、代谢和炎症功能领域。采用Spearman等级相关性分析来检验应激负荷与年龄、收入、修订版产前应激问卷(NuPDQ)、抑郁症状量表(IDS)及匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)之间的关联。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验按种族和教育程度比较应激负荷。
共纳入103名女性,平均年龄29.8±5.0岁,17.5%为黑人,平均孕周12.2±1.1周。应激负荷与PSQI呈正相关(ρ=0.23,p=0.018)。与年龄、收入、产前应激、种族或抑郁评分均无关联。与受教育程度较低的女性相比,受过大学教育的女性应激负荷较低(0.57±0.43 vs 0.81±0.55,p=0.045)。
通过特定于妊娠的模型测得的较高应激负荷与较差的睡眠质量及较低的教育程度相关,这两者均被视为慢性应激源。这些关系与先前在非妊娠人群中的研究结果一致,表明应激负荷可能有助于了解孕早期慢性应激的生理影响。