Suppr超能文献

孕期女性的应激负荷可能与慢性应激无关,NHANES1999-2006。

Allostatic load may not be associated with chronic stress in pregnant women, NHANES 1999-2006.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2013 May;23(5):294-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.03.006.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pregnant women are generally excluded from studies that measure allostatic load (AL) because there is concern that the changing levels of AL-related biomarkers during pregnancy do not reflect a woman's true AL. The goal of this study was to determine whether AL can be measured in a meaningful way during pregnancy.

METHODS

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the U.S. civilian population. AL was based on the distributions of 10 biomarkers in pregnant (n = 1138) and nonpregnant (n = 4993) women aged 15 to 44 from NHANES (1999-2006).

RESULTS

The distribution of each AL-related biomarker differed significantly between pregnant and nonpregnant women (P < .01). Among nonpregnant women, high AL findings were consistent with previous studies (e.g., higher AL in women who are black, are older, and who have lower incomes). However, these associations were not seen in pregnant women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the various biomarkers that comprise AL may reflect proximal factors in pregnancy more strongly than they represent exposure to chronic stress over a woman's lifetime. Therefore, our approach to measuring AL may not provide meaningful information about chronic stress in pregnant women without further consideration of pregnancy-related factors.

摘要

目的

由于担心怀孕期间与压力有关的生物标志物水平的变化不能反映女性的真实压力水平,因此通常将孕妇排除在衡量压力负荷(AL)的研究之外。本研究旨在确定在怀孕期间是否可以以有意义的方式衡量 AL。

方法

国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)是对美国 15 至 44 岁的平民人口进行的全国代表性的横断面调查。AL 基于 NHANES(1999-2006 年)中 10 个生物标志物在孕妇(n = 1138)和非孕妇(n = 4993)中的分布。

结果

每个与 AL 相关的生物标志物在孕妇和非孕妇之间的分布差异显著(P <.01)。在非孕妇中,高 AL 的发现与先前的研究一致(例如,黑人、年龄较大和收入较低的女性 AL 较高)。然而,在孕妇中并未观察到这些关联。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,构成 AL 的各种生物标志物可能更强烈地反映了妊娠期间的近端因素,而不是反映了女性一生中暴露于慢性压力的情况。因此,如果不进一步考虑与妊娠相关的因素,我们衡量 AL 的方法可能无法为孕妇的慢性压力提供有意义的信息。

相似文献

2
Exploring the validity of allostatic load in pregnant women.探讨孕妇应激负荷的有效性。
Midwifery. 2020 Mar;82:102621. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102621. Epub 2019 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

2
The Role of Racism in Childhood Obesity.种族主义在儿童肥胖症中的作用。
Curr Obes Rep. 2024 Mar;13(1):98-106. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00538-9. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
5
Allostatic Load and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.应激负荷与不良妊娠结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec 1;140(6):974-982. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004971. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
Prenatal allostatic load and preterm birth: A systematic review.产前应激负荷与早产:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 4;13:1004073. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004073. eCollection 2022.
7
Allostatic Load Among Black Sexual Minority Women.黑人性少数女性的应激负荷。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Aug;30(8):1165-1170. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8912. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Acknowledging and Addressing Allostatic Load in Pregnancy Care.承认并解决孕期中的应激负荷问题。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Feb;8(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00757-z. Epub 2020 May 7.

本文引用的文献

3
Stress, Allostatic Load and Health of Mexican Immigrants.压力、适应性负荷与墨西哥移民的健康
Soc Sci Q. 2009 Dec 1;90(5):1089-1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00648.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验