Parvaresh Kevin C, Osborn Emily J, Reighard Fredrick G, Doan Joshua, Bastrom Tracey P, Newton Peter O
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Orthopedic Research Department, Children's Specialist of San Diego, 3030 Childrens Way, Suite 410, San Diego, CA 92123-4228, USA.
Spine Deform. 2017 May;5(3):159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.12.002.
Retrospective.
To develop and validate a prediction formula to estimate three-dimensional (3D) T5-T12 kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) from standard two-dimensional (2D) radiographic measurements.
2D measurements of thoracic kyphosis in AIS patients overestimate 3D kyphosis; however, there is a lack of widespread availability of 3D imaging technology.
Retrospective review was performed for AIS patients with right thoracic curves evaluated with EOS Imaging from January 2010 to June 2014. Standard 2D posteroanterior and lateral radiographic measurements, pelvic incidence, Nash-Moe grade, Perdriolle rotation, and "3D T5-T12" sagittal measures (reconstructed with sterEOS, analyzed with custom MatLab code) were input into a multivariate logistic analysis to create a prediction model for 3D T5-T12 sagittal alignment. An initial cohort of 66 patients (curves 14°-85°) was used to create a predictive model, and a separate cohort of 129 patients (curves 16°-84°) was used to validate the formula.
2D thoracic coronal Cobb and 2D T5-T12 kyphosis were the only significant predictors in the model. The prediction formula for estimating 3D T5-T12 sagittal measurement from standard 2D measurements, in degrees, was 18.1 + (0.812D T5-T12 sagittal Cobb) - (0.542D coronal Cobb), r = 0.84. The average model error between predicted and measured 3D T5-T12 kyphosis was ±7°. The predicted 3D T5-T12 kyphosis (8.6° ± 12.1°) and measured 3D T5-T12 kyphosis (8.5° ± 13.0°) were not significantly different (p = .8). 3D kyphosis was less than standard measures of 2D kyphosis (8.5° ± 13.0° vs. 20.2° ± 12.6°, p < .001).
This simple validated formula to predict 3D T5-T12 sagittal alignment using routine 2D thoracic Cobb and T5-T12 kyphosis for thoracic AIS patients has great potential value in assessing historical data collected prior to the development of 3D imaging methods as well as understanding/planning surgical hypokyphosis correction in patients without access to 3D imaging.
回顾性研究。
开发并验证一个预测公式,用于根据标准二维(2D)X线测量值估算青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者的胸5至胸12三维(3D)后凸畸形。
AIS患者胸段后凸的2D测量值高估了3D后凸;然而,3D成像技术尚未广泛应用。
对2010年1月至2014年6月期间接受EOS成像评估的右胸弯AIS患者进行回顾性研究。将标准的2D正位和侧位X线测量值、骨盆入射角、Nash-Moe分级、Perdriolle旋转度以及“3D胸5至胸12”矢状面测量值(使用sterEOS重建,通过自定义MatLab代码分析)输入多变量逻辑分析,以创建3D胸5至胸12矢状面排列的预测模型。最初的66例患者队列(侧弯角度14°至85°)用于创建预测模型,另一组129例患者队列(侧弯角度16°至84°)用于验证该公式。
2D胸段冠状面Cobb角和2D胸5至胸12后凸是模型中仅有的显著预测因素。根据标准2D测量值估算3D胸5至胸12矢状面测量值的预测公式(单位为度)为18.1 +(0.81×2D胸5至胸12矢状面Cobb角)-(0.54×2D冠状面Cobb角),r = 0.84。预测的和测量的3D胸5至胸12后凸之间的平均模型误差为±7°。预测的3D胸5至胸12后凸(8.6°±12.1°)与测量的3D胸5至胸12后凸(8.5°±13.0°)无显著差异(p = 0.8)。3D后凸小于2D后凸的标准测量值(8.5°±13.0°对20.2°±12.6°,p < 0.001)。
这个简单且经过验证的公式,利用常规的2D胸段Cobb角和胸5至胸12后凸来预测AIS患者的3D胸5至胸12矢状面排列,在评估3D成像方法出现之前收集的数据以及理解/规划无法进行3D成像患者的手术低后凸矫正方面具有巨大的潜在价值。