• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经股动脉和经心尖入路分层的非agenarians患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果。 注:这里“nonagenarians”可能有误,推测可能是“nonagenarian”,意为“九十多岁的人” ,若按此正确词汇翻译为:九十多岁患者经股动脉和经心尖入路分层的经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果 。

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Nonagenarians Stratified by Transfemoral and Transapical Approach.

作者信息

McNeely Christian, Zajarias Alan, Robbs Randall, Markwell Stephen, Vassileva Christina M

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun;103(6):1808-1814. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.056. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.056
PMID:28450135
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survival and other outcomes of nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the Medicare population are unclear.

METHODS

Patients aged 65 years and older who underwent TAVR from November 2011 through 2013 were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

The study consisted of 18,283 patients and 19.3% were aged 90 years or older. Compared with patients younger than 90 years, patients 90 years or older were less likely to have a number of comorbidities, including previous myocardial infarction (17.5% versus 21.8%), previous coronary artery bypass grafting (20.0% versus 35.0%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (25.4% versus 39.0%) among others. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 8.4% versus 5.9% (p = 0.0001) and 25.4% versus 21.5% (p = 0.0001) in the older and younger groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28 to 1.70, p = 0.0001). Patients 90 years and older were more likely to undergo pacemaker insertion (11.1% versus 8.3%, p = 0.0001). Among nonagenarians, compared with the transapical group, patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR had lower 30-day (7.2% versus 13.6%, p = 0.0001) and 1-year (23.8% versus 31.6%, p = 0.0001) mortality rates, were more likely to be discharged home (54.4% versus 34.1%, p = 0.0001), and had lower 30-day readmission rates (23.8% versus 31.8%, p = 0.0001). After adjustment for patient characteristics, transapical TAVR was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality rate (OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.56, p = 0.0001) and readmission (OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.80, p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TAVR, although 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were slightly worse for nonagenarians than their younger counterparts, long-term survival was still encouraging, with 75% of nonagenarians living to 1 year. Transapical TAVR was associated with worse outcomes in nonagenarians.

摘要

背景

医疗保险人群中接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的九旬老人的生存情况及其他预后尚不清楚。

方法

纳入2011年11月至2013年期间接受TAVR的65岁及以上患者。

结果

该研究共纳入18283例患者,其中19.3%的患者年龄在90岁及以上。与90岁以下患者相比,90岁及以上患者的多种合并症发生率较低,包括既往心肌梗死(17.5%对21.8%)、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(20.0%对35.0%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(25.4%对39.0%)等。老年组和年轻组的30天死亡率分别为8.4%和5.9%(p = 0.0001),1年死亡率分别为25.4%和21.5%(p = 0.0001)(优势比[OR]1.47,95%置信区间[CI]:1.28至1.70,p = 0.0001)。90岁及以上患者更有可能接受起搏器植入(11.1%对8.3%,p = 0.0001)。在九旬老人中,与经心尖组相比,经股动脉TAVR患者的30天(7.2%对13.6%,p = 0.0001)和1年(23.8%对31.6%,p = 0.0001)死亡率更低,更有可能出院回家(54.4%对34.1%,p = 0.0001),30天再入院率更低(23.8%对31.8%,p = 0.0001)。在对患者特征进行调整后,经心尖TAVR是30天死亡率(OR 1.94,95% CI:1.48至2.56,p = 0.0001)和再入院(OR 1.46,95% CI:1.19至1.80,p = 0.0003)的独立预测因素。

结论

在接受TAVR的患者中,尽管九旬老人的30天和1年死亡率略高于年轻患者,但其长期生存率仍令人鼓舞,75%的九旬老人存活至1年。经心尖TAVR与九旬老人的预后较差相关。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in Nonagenarians Stratified by Transfemoral and Transapical Approach.经股动脉和经心尖入路分层的非agenarians患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果。 注:这里“nonagenarians”可能有误,推测可能是“nonagenarian”,意为“九十多岁的人” ,若按此正确词汇翻译为:九十多岁患者经股动脉和经心尖入路分层的经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果 。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun;103(6):1808-1814. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.02.056. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians?: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.百岁老人是否应接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术?来自美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 29;67(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.055.
3
Transfemoral TAVR in Nonagenarians: From the CENTER Collaboration.经股动脉入路主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上高龄患者中的应用:来自 CENTER 协作组的研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):911-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.031.
4
Alternative Access Versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.非agenarians中经导管主动脉瓣置换术的替代入路与经股动脉入路对比
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jun;31(6):171-175. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians: early and intermediate outcome from the OBSERVANT study and meta-analysis of the literature.非agenarians经导管主动脉瓣置换术:来自OBSERVANT研究的早期和中期结果以及文献荟萃分析。 注:这里“nonagenarians”可能有误,推测可能是“nonagenarians”(九旬老人),如果是这个词的话,译文为:九旬老人经导管主动脉瓣置换术:来自OBSERVANT研究的早期和中期结果以及文献荟萃分析。
Heart Vessels. 2017 Feb;32(2):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0857-3. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
Outcomes for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.非agenarians患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的预后。 注:这里“Nonagenarians”意思是九十多岁的人,可能原文有误,正常医学语境下常用“nonagenarian”表示“九十多岁的人” 。按照准确的词汇来翻译整体句子应该是“九十多岁患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的预后” 。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Oct;100(4):1261-7; discussion 1267. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.037. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
7
Comparative Outcomes of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Nonagenarians.非agenarians主动脉瓣狭窄患者外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较结果。 注:这里“Nonagenarians”指的是九十多岁的人,可根据实际语境调整表述,比如“九十多岁的老年患者” 。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;119(6):893-899. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.045. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
8
Alternative Access Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians versus Younger Patients.非高龄患者与年轻患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的不同入路选择。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;69(5):437-444. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708478. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Clinical Outcomes After Transapical and Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion: An Evolving Experience.经心尖与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置入术后的临床结果:不断发展的经验
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.073. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
10
Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with or without prior coronary artery bypass graft operation.有或无冠状动脉旁路移植术史患者的经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov 29;11(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0551-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Identification of Modifiable Predictors of Patient Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者预后可改变预测因素的机器学习识别
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 16;3(8):101116. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101116. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Mortality at one year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement - Relation of age and comorbidities.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后一年的死亡率——年龄与合并症的关系
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Nov 30;43:101157. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101157. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement over age 90: Risks vs benefits.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗 90 岁以上患者:风险与获益。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):156-162. doi: 10.1002/clc.23310. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上高龄患者中的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Feb 24;2019:5819232. doi: 10.1155/2019/5819232. eCollection 2019.
5
Long-term outcomes in Japanese nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multi-center analysis.日本 90 岁以上人群行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的长期预后:一项多中心分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Jun;42(6):605-611. doi: 10.1002/clc.23183. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes between octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a propensity matched analysis.行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的八旬老人与九旬老人的院内结局比较:一项倾向匹配分析。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Feb;15(2):123-130. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.02.001.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: selectively feasible or extravagantly futile?百岁老人经导管主动脉瓣植入术:是选择性可行还是极度徒劳?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):524-531. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.07.11.