Suppr超能文献

使用扩散加权磁共振成像鉴别转移性和非转移性淋巴结:诊断准确性研究的荟萃分析

Differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes using DW-MRI: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

作者信息

Zhou Min, Lu Bin, Lv Gang, Tang Qin, Zhu Jibiao, Li Jun, Shi Kaide

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 64 Chaohu Bei Road, Chaohu, Hefei, 238000, China,

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;141(6):1119-30. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1895-9. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Abstract

PURPOSES

The purpose of our meta-analysis was to assess the overall diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in detecting node metastases and investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value could be used to discriminate between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with primary tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The meta-analysis included a total of 1,748 metastatic and 6,547 non-metastatic lymph nodes from 39 studies, including 8 different tumor types with lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DW-MRI were 0.82 (95 % CI 0.76-0.87) and 0.92 (95 % CI 0.88-0.94), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and the area under the curve were 9.8 (95 % CI 6.9-14.0), 0.20 (95 % CI 0.15-0.26) and 0.93 (95 % CI 0.91-0.95), respectively. The probability of 42 % can be viewed as the cutoff pretest probability for DW-MRI to diagnosis lymph node metastases; when the more chance of metastatic increased from 42 % that the pretest probability was estimated, it was more suitable to emphasize on "ruling in," on the contrary, and when the more chance of metastatic decreased from 42 %, it was more suitable to emphasize on "ruling out." Furthermore, the mean ADC value of metastatic lymph nodes was significantly lower than that of non-metastatic (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DW-MRI is useful for differentiation between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes. However, DW-MRI has a moderate diagnostic value for physician's decision making when PLR and NLR took into consideration, while a superior ability for nodal metastases confirmation, but an inferior ability for ruling out. In the future, large-scale, high-quality trials are necessary to evaluate, respectively, their clinical value in different tumor types with nodal metastases.

摘要

目的

我们进行这项荟萃分析的目的是评估扩散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)在检测淋巴结转移方面的总体诊断价值,并研究表观扩散系数(ADC)值是否可用于鉴别原发性肿瘤患者的转移性和非转移性淋巴结。

材料与方法

该荟萃分析共纳入了来自39项研究的1748个转移性淋巴结和6547个非转移性淋巴结,这些研究涵盖了8种不同类型伴有淋巴结转移的肿瘤。

结果

DW-MRI的合并敏感度和特异度分别为0.82(95%CI 0.76-0.87)和0.92(95%CI 0.88-0.94)。阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和曲线下面积分别为9.8(95%CI 6.9-14.0)、0.20(95%CI 0.15-0.26)和0.93(95%CI 0.91-0.95)。42%的概率可被视为DW-MRI诊断淋巴结转移的截断验前概率;当转移可能性从估计的验前概率42%增加时,更适合强调“确诊”,相反,当转移可能性从42%降低时,更适合强调“排除”。此外,转移性淋巴结的平均ADC值显著低于非转移性淋巴结(P = 0.001)。

结论

DW-MRI有助于鉴别转移性和非转移性淋巴结。然而,考虑到PLR和NLR时,DW-MRI对医生决策的诊断价值中等,在确诊淋巴结转移方面能力较强,但在排除方面能力较弱。未来,有必要进行大规模、高质量的试验,分别评估其在不同类型伴有淋巴结转移肿瘤中的临床价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验