University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(2):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4260-2. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Aromatase inhibitors (AI), which decrease circulating estradiol concentrations in post-menopausal women, are associated with toxicities that limit adherence. Approximately one-third of patients will tolerate a different AI after not tolerating the first. We report the effect of crossover from exemestane to letrozole or vice versa on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and whether the success of crossover is due to lack of estrogen suppression.
Post-menopausal women enrolled on a prospective trial initiating AI therapy for early-stage breast cancer were randomized to exemestane or letrozole. Those that discontinued for intolerance were offered protocol-directed crossover to the other AI after a washout period. Changes in PROs, including pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)] and functional status [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], were compared after 3 months on the first versus the second AI. Estradiol and drug concentrations were measured.
Eighty-three patients participated in the crossover protocol, of whom 91.3% reported improvement in symptoms prior to starting the second AI. Functional status worsened less after 3 months with the second AI (HAQ mean change AI #1: 0.2 [SD 0.41] vs. AI #2: -0.05 [SD 0.36]; p = 0.001); change in pain scores was similar between the first and second AI (VAS mean change AI #1: 0.8 [SD 2.7] vs. AI #2: -0.2 [SD 2.8]; p = 0.19). No statistical differences in estradiol or drug concentrations were found between those that continued or discontinued AI after crossover.
Although all AIs act via the same mechanism, a subset of patients intolerant to one AI report improved PROs with a different one. The mechanism of this tolerance remains unknown, but does not appear to be due to non-adherence to, or insufficient estrogen suppression by, the second AI.
芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)可降低绝经后妇女的循环雌二醇浓度,但其相关毒性会限制患者的依从性。大约有三分之一的患者在不能耐受第一种 AI 后可以耐受另一种 AI。我们报告了从依西美坦转换为来曲唑或反之对患者报告的结局(PROs)的影响,以及交叉转换是否成功是否是由于缺乏雌激素抑制。
入组了一项前瞻性试验的绝经后妇女开始接受早期乳腺癌的 AI 治疗,被随机分配至依西美坦或来曲唑组。因不耐受而停药的患者在洗脱期后接受方案指导的交叉治疗,转换为另一种 AI。比较患者在接受第一种和第二种 AI 治疗 3 个月后的 PRO 变化,包括疼痛(视觉模拟量表(VAS))和功能状态(健康评估问卷(HAQ))。测量雌二醇和药物浓度。
83 例患者参与了交叉方案,其中 91.3%的患者在开始使用第二种 AI 之前报告症状改善。在接受第二种 AI 治疗 3 个月后,功能状态恶化程度较轻(HAQ 平均变化 AI#1:0.2[SD 0.41]vs. AI#2:-0.05[SD 0.36];p=0.001);两种 AI 之间疼痛评分的变化相似(VAS 平均变化 AI#1:0.8[SD 2.7]vs. AI#2:-0.2[SD 2.8];p=0.19)。在交叉后继续或停止 AI 治疗的患者之间,雌二醇或药物浓度无统计学差异。
尽管所有 AI 均通过相同的机制发挥作用,但一部分对一种 AI 不耐受的患者报告称使用另一种 AI 后 PROs 得到改善。这种耐受的机制尚不清楚,但似乎不是由于对第二种 AI 的不依从或雌激素抑制不足所致。