• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在需要大量输血方案的患者中输注不相容的A型血浆:东部创伤外科学会多中心研究结果

Incompatible type A plasma transfusion in patients requiring massive transfusion protocol: Outcomes of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

作者信息

Stevens W Tait, Morse Bryan C, Bernard Andrew, Davenport Daniel L, Sams Valerie G, Goodman Michael D, Dumire Russell, Carrick Matthew M, McCarthy Patrick, Stubbs James R, Pritts Timothy A, Dente Christopher J, Luo-Owen Xian, Gregory Jason A, Turay David, Gomaa Dina, Quispe Juan C, Fitzgerald Caitlin A, Haddad Nadeem N, Choudhry Asad, Quesada Jose F, Zielinski Martin D

机构信息

From the Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology (W.T.S.) and Trauma Division, Department of Surgery (X.L.-O., D.T., Q.J.C.), Loma Linda, California; Emory School of Medicine, Department of Surgery-Grady Memorial Hospital (B.C.M., C.J.D., C.A.F.), Atlanta, Georgia; University of Kentucky (A.B., D.D.), Department of Surgery, Lexington, Kentucky; San Antonio Military Medical Center, Division of Trauma Critical Care (V.G.S.), Department of Pathology (J.G., J.Q.), and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (P.M.C.), San Antonio, Texas; University of Cincinnati (M.G., T.P., D.G.), Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Trauma Research, Medical City Plano, Plano, Texas; The Medical Center of Plano (R.D.), Plano, Texas; Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center (M.C.), Johnstown, Pennsylvania; Mayo Clinic, Department of Surgery; Division of Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery; Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):25-29. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001532.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000001532
PMID:28452877
Abstract

UNLABELLED

With a relative shortage of type AB plasma, many centers have converted to type A plasma for resuscitation of patients whose blood type is unknown. The goal of this study is to determine outcomes for trauma patients who received incompatible plasma transfusions as part of a massive transfusion protocol (MTP).

METHODS

As part of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial, registry and blood bank data were collected from eight trauma centers for trauma patients (age, ≥ 15 years) receiving emergency release plasma transfusions as part of MTPs from January 2012 to August 2016. Incompatible type A plasma was defined as transfusion to patient blood type B or type AB.

RESULTS

Of the 1,536 patients identified, 92% received compatible plasma transfusions and 8% received incompatible type A plasma. Patient characteristics were similar except for greater penetrating injuries (48% vs 36%; p = 0.01) in the incompatible group. In the incompatible group, patients were transfused more plasma units at 4 hours (median, 9 vs. 5; p < 0.001) and overall for stay (11 vs. 9; p = 0.03). No hemolytic transfusion reactions were reported. Two transfusion-related acute lung injury events were reported in the compatible group. Between incompatible and compatible groups, there was no difference in the rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (6% vs. 8%; p = 0.589), thromboembolic events (9% vs. 7%; p = 0.464), sepsis (6% vs. 8%; p = 0.589), or acute renal failure (8% vs. 8%, p = 0.860). Mortality at 6 (17% vs. 15%, p = 0.775) and 24 hours (25% vs. 23%, p = 0.544) and at 28 days or discharge (38% vs. 35%, p = 0.486) were similar between groups. Multivariate regression demonstrated that Injury Severity Score, older age and more red blood cell transfusion at 4 hours were independently associated with death at 28 days or discharge; Injury Severity Score and more red blood cell transfusion at 4 hours were predictors for morbidity. Incompatible transfusion was not an independent determinant of mortality or morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Transfusion of type A plasma to patients with blood groups B and AB as part of a MTP does not appear to be associated with significant increases in morbidity or mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

摘要

未标注

由于AB型血浆相对短缺,许多中心已改用A型血浆来复苏血型未知的患者。本研究的目的是确定作为大量输血方案(MTP)一部分接受不相容血浆输血的创伤患者的结局。

方法

作为东部创伤外科学会多机构试验的一部分,收集了八个创伤中心从2012年1月至2016年8月作为MTP一部分接受紧急发放血浆输血的创伤患者(年龄≥15岁)的登记和血库数据。不相容的A型血浆定义为输给B型或AB型患者。

结果

在确定的1536例患者中,92%接受了相容血浆输血,8%接受了不相容的A型血浆。除不相容组穿透伤更多(48%对36%;p = 0.01)外,患者特征相似。在不相容组中,患者在4小时时输注的血浆单位更多(中位数,9对5;p < 0.001),住院期间总体输注量也更多(11对9;p = 0.03)。未报告溶血性输血反应。相容组报告了两例输血相关急性肺损伤事件。不相容组和相容组之间,急性呼吸窘迫综合征发生率(6%对8%;p = 0.589)、血栓栓塞事件发生率(9%对7%;p = 0.464)、败血症发生率(6%对8%;p = 0.589)或急性肾衰竭发生率(8%对8%,p = 0.860)无差异。两组在6小时(17%对15%,p = 0.775)、24小时(25%对23%,p = 0.544)以及28天或出院时(38%对35%,p = 0.486)的死亡率相似。多变量回归表明,损伤严重程度评分、年龄较大以及4小时时更多的红细胞输血与28天或出院时的死亡独立相关;损伤严重程度评分和4小时时更多的红细胞输血是发病的预测因素。不相容输血不是死亡率或发病率的独立决定因素。

结论

作为MTP一部分,将A型血浆输给B型和AB型患者似乎与发病率或死亡率的显著增加无关。

证据水平

治疗性研究,IV级。

相似文献

1
Incompatible type A plasma transfusion in patients requiring massive transfusion protocol: Outcomes of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.在需要大量输血方案的患者中输注不相容的A型血浆:东部创伤外科学会多中心研究结果
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):25-29. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001532.
2
Group A emergency-release plasma in trauma patients requiring massive transfusion.创伤患者大量输血时输注 A 型应急释放血浆。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1061-1067. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002903.
3
Emergency use of prethawed Group A plasma in trauma patients.创伤患者中 A 型血浆的应急解冻使用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jan;74(1):69-74; discussion 74-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182788f8e.
4
Outcomes after ultramassive transfusion in the modern era: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.现代超大容量输血后的结局:东部创伤外科学会多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Jul 1;91(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003121.
5
The Effect of Evolving Fluid Resuscitation on the Outcome of Severely Injured Patients: An 8-year Experience at a Tertiary Trauma Center.液体复苏方案的演变对重伤患者预后的影响:一家三级创伤中心的8年经验
Scand J Surg. 2016 Jun;105(2):109-16. doi: 10.1177/1457496915586650. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
The effects of balanced blood component resuscitation and crystalloid administration in pediatric trauma patients requiring transfusion in Afghanistan and Iraq 2002 to 2012.2002年至2012年在阿富汗和伊拉克需要输血的小儿创伤患者中平衡血液成分复苏和晶体液输注的效果
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Feb;78(2):330-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000469.
7
Use of Plasma-Based Trauma Transfusion Protocols at Level IV Trauma Centers.四级创伤中心基于血浆的创伤输血方案的应用。
J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;25(4):213-217. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000375.
8
An emergency department thawed plasma protocol for severely injured patients.严重创伤患者的急诊解冻血浆方案。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Feb;148(2):170-5. doi: 10.1001/jamasurgery.2013.414.
9
Effect of Pre-Hospital Use of the Assessment of Blood Consumption Score and Pre-Thawed Fresh Frozen Plasma on Resuscitation and Trauma Mortality.院前使用血液消耗评分和预解冻新鲜冷冻血浆对复苏和创伤死亡率的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Feb;228(2):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
10
Efficacy of a massive transfusion protocol for hemorrhagic trauma resuscitation.大出血创伤复苏中采用大量输血方案的疗效。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1178-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.060. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhospital coagulation management and fluid replacement therapy in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries - a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.多发伤和/或重伤患者的院内凝血管理及液体替代治疗——系统评价与临床实践指南更新
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jun 27;51(1):240. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02919-2.
2
[The chapters "Stop the bleed-prehospital" and "Coagulation management and volume therapy (emergency departement)" in the new S3 guideline "Polytrauma/severe injury treatment"].[新的S3指南“多发伤/严重创伤治疗”中的“院前止血”和“凝血管理与容量治疗(急诊科)”章节]
Notf Rett Med. 2023;26(4):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s10049-023-01147-8. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
哪些实验室检测和生理触发因素应指导危重症儿童输注血小板或血浆的决策,以及哪些产品特性最有利于指导特定产品的选择?来自输血和贫血专家倡议-控制/避免出血。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(13 Suppl 1 1S):e1-e13. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002854.
4
Group A emergency-release plasma in trauma patients requiring massive transfusion.创伤患者大量输血时输注 A 型应急释放血浆。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1061-1067. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002903.
5
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition.欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南:第五版。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 27;23(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2347-3.
6
Acute Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction in Group B Recipient Associated with Group A Apheresis Platelet Donor: Case Report and Literature Review.B 组受血者与 A 组单采血小板供者相关的急性溶血性输血反应:病例报告及文献复习
Case Rep Med. 2018 Jun 24;2018:8259531. doi: 10.1155/2018/8259531. eCollection 2018.