University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):845-863. doi: 10.1111/jora.12234. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
The staff of youth development programs perform a delicate balancing act between supporting youth agency and exercising necessary authority. To understand this balancing in daily practice, we interviewed 25 experienced (M = 14 years) leaders of arts, leadership, and technology programs for high-school-aged youth. We obtained accounts of when, how, and why they gave advice, set limits, and "supported youth when disagreeing." Qualitative analysis found surprising similarities across leaders. They used authority to give advice and set limits, but did so with reasoned restraint. Maximizing youth's opportunities to learn from experience was central in their decision making. They described employing authority in intentional ways aimed at helping youth's work succeed, strengthening youth's agency, and building skills for agency (e.g., critical thinking, "clarifying intent").
青年发展项目的工作人员在支持青年的能动性和行使必要的权力之间进行着微妙的平衡。为了了解这种平衡在日常实践中的体现,我们采访了 25 名经验丰富的(平均年龄 14 岁)艺术、领导力和技术项目的青年项目领导者。我们获得了他们何时、如何以及为何提供建议、设定限制以及“在不同意时支持青年”的相关信息。定性分析发现,领导者之间存在惊人的相似之处。他们使用权威来提供建议和设定限制,但这样做是有合理的克制的。最大限度地为年轻人提供从经验中学习的机会是他们决策的核心。他们描述了以有目的的方式运用权力,旨在帮助年轻人的工作取得成功,增强年轻人的能动性,并培养能动性的技能(例如,批判性思维,“澄清意图”)。