• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影用于选择性心脏导管插入术的原理与设计:与心血管结局、成本效益及生活质量的关系(CONSERVE)试验

Rationale and design of the Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization: Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Life (CONSERVE) trial.

作者信息

Lee Sang-Eun, Lin Fay Y, Lu Yao, Chang Hyuk-Jae, Min James K

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.

Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2017 Apr;186:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.12.007
PMID:28454832
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has shown promise as a "gatekeeper" to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in longitudinal cohort studies, it remains unknown whether the strategy of selective ICA by initial performance of CCTA is either safe or effective when compared with a direct ICA strategy in patients with an American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) guideline-directed indication for ICA.

OBJECTIVES

The CONSERVE trial is a prospective randomized multicenter trial to determine the clinical effectiveness of "selective catheterization" vs "direct catheterization" strategies for stable patients with suspected but without known coronary artery disease, who meet AHA/ACC guideline indication for ICA.

METHODS

Patients being referred for clinically indicated nonemergent ICA with an AHA/ACC class II guideline indication for ICA will be randomized to either direct catheterization or selective catheterization strategy. Patients in the direct catheterization arm will proceed directly to ICA as planned, whereas patients in the select catheterization arm will undergo initial CCTA, followed by ICA at the discretion of the site physician. All CCTAs and ICAs will be interpreted on site. Follow-up testing and/or therapy after CCTA or ICA will be at the discretion of the site physician.

RESULTS

This trial will report a primary clinical end point of noninferiority rates of major adverse cardiac events, as defined by the composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, urgent or emergent coronary revascularization, or cardiac hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The CONSERVE trial will determine whether selective catheterization strategy, based on initial CCTA in patients being referred to ICA, is safe and effective.

摘要

未标注

尽管在纵向队列研究中,冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)已显示出有望作为侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)的“守门人”,但与直接ICA策略相比,对于有美国心脏协会(AHA)/美国心脏病学会(ACC)指南指导的ICA指征的患者,通过初始CCTA进行选择性ICA的策略是否安全或有效仍不清楚。

目的

CONSERVE试验是一项前瞻性随机多中心试验,旨在确定对于疑似但无已知冠状动脉疾病且符合AHA/ACC指南ICA指征的稳定患者,“选择性导管插入术”与“直接导管插入术”策略的临床有效性。

方法

因临床需要进行非紧急ICA且有AHA/ACC II类指南ICA指征的患者将被随机分为直接导管插入术或选择性导管插入术策略组。直接导管插入术组的患者将按计划直接进行ICA,而选择性导管插入术组的患者将首先接受CCTA,然后由现场医生酌情决定是否进行ICA。所有CCTA和ICA均在现场解读。CCTA或ICA后的随访检查和/或治疗将由现场医生酌情决定。

结果

本试验将报告主要不良心脏事件非劣效率的主要临床终点,主要不良心脏事件定义为死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、中风、紧急或急诊冠状动脉血运重建或心脏住院的综合情况。

结论

CONSERVE试验将确定对于转诊至ICA的患者,基于初始CCTA的选择性导管插入术策略是否安全有效。

相似文献

1
Rationale and design of the Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization: Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Life (CONSERVE) trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影用于选择性心脏导管插入术的原理与设计:与心血管结局、成本效益及生活质量的关系(CONSERVE)试验
Am Heart J. 2017 Apr;186:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
2
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.采用 CCTA 选择性转诊与直接转诊对疑似 CAD 行有创冠状动脉造影检查的患者进行对比:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
3
Atherosclerosis Imaging Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography in the randomized controlled CONSERVE trial.动脉粥样硬化成像定量计算机断层扫描(AI-QCT)指导随机对照 CONSERVE 试验中侵入性冠状动脉造影的转诊。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 May;46(5):477-483. doi: 10.1002/clc.23995. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of 64-slice computed tomography vs. cardiac catheterization to rule out coronary artery disease before non-coronary cardiovascular surgery.64 层 CT 与心导管术用于非冠状动脉心血管手术前排除冠状动脉疾病的成本效益分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Feb;14(2):149-57. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes121. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
5
The value of Coronary Artery computed Tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected Coronary Artery Disease: CAT-CAD randomized trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描作为疑似冠心病行有创血管造影适应证的稳定型患者一线解剖学检查的价值:CAT-CAD 随机试验。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Nov-Dec;12(6):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high-risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR-64 randomized clinical trial.CT 血管造影筛查对糖尿病高危患者死亡率和心脏事件的影响:FACTOR-64 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 3;312(21):2234-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15825.
7
Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.计算机断层血管造影引导诊断策略与常规治疗对疑似冠心病患者进行血流储备分数测定的临床结局:FFR(CT)前瞻性纵向试验:结局与资源影响研究
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3359-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与心肌单光子发射计算机断层扫描在中危胸痛患者中的比较:基于真实世界成本的成本效益随机临床试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):417-425. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey099.
9
Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术作为侵入性诊断和手术程序的守门员:来自多中心 CONFIRM(冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术评估临床结果:国际多中心)登记研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 13;60(20):2103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
10
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Chest Pain Admitted to Telemetry: A Randomized Trial.胸痛患者入院进行遥测时冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影与放射性核素心肌灌注显像的比较:一项随机试验
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 4;163(3):174-83. doi: 10.7326/M14-2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Does FFR have proven utility as a gatekeeper prior to invasive angiography?在进行有创血管造影之前,血流储备分数(FFR)作为一种筛选手段是否已被证明具有实用价值?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Oct;24(5):1619-1625. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0974-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
2
An FFR diagnostic strategy versus usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease planned for invasive coronary angiography at German sites: one-year results of a subgroup analysis of the PLATFORM (Prospective Longitudinal Trial of FFR: Outcome and Resource Impacts) study.在德国各研究点计划接受有创冠状动脉造影的疑似冠心病患者中,采用血流储备分数(FFR)诊断策略与常规治疗的对比:PLATFORM(FFR前瞻性纵向试验:结局与资源影响)研究亚组分析的一年结果
Open Heart. 2017 Mar 22;4(1):e000526. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000526. eCollection 2017.