• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 CCTA 选择性转诊与直接转诊对疑似 CAD 行有创冠状动脉造影检查的患者进行对比:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。

Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.

机构信息

Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.

Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018
PMID:30553687
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the safety and diagnostic yield of a selective referral strategy using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) compared with a direct referral strategy using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the index procedure.

BACKGROUND

Among patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD), a sizeable proportion who are referred to ICA do not have a significant, obstructive stenosis.

METHODS

In a multinational, randomized clinical trial of patients referred to ICA for nonemergent indications, a selective referral strategy was compared with a direct referral strategy. The primary endpoint was noninferiority with a multiplicative margin of 1.33 of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (blindly adjudicated death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, urgent and/or emergent coronary revascularization or cardiac hospitalization) at a median follow-up of 1-year.

RESULTS

At 22 sites, 823 subjects were randomized to a selective referral and 808 to a direct referral strategy. At 1 year, selective referral met the noninferiority margin of 1.33 (p = 0.026) with a similar event rate between the randomized arms of the trial (4.6% vs. 4.6%; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.47). Following CCTA, only 23% of the selective referral arm went on to ICA, which was a rate lower than that of the direct referral strategy. Coronary revascularization occurred less often in the selective referral group compared with the direct referral to ICA (13% vs. 18%; p < 0.001). Rates of normal ICA were 24.6% in the selective referral arm compared with 61.1% in the direct referral arm of the trial (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In stable patients with suspected CAD who are eligible for ICA, the comparable 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events rates following a selective referral and direct referral strategy suggests that both diagnostic approaches are similarly effective. In the selective referral strategy, the reduced use of ICA was associated with a greater diagnostic yield, which supported the usefulness of CCTA as an efficient and accurate method to guide decisions of ICA performance. (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization [CONSERVE]; NCT01810198).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较采用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)进行选择性转诊策略与直接转诊策略(以经皮冠状动脉造影术[ICA]作为索引程序)的安全性和诊断效果。

背景

在出现疑似冠心病(CAD)症状和体征的患者中,相当一部分被转诊至 ICA 的患者并无明显的、阻塞性狭窄。

方法

在一项针对非紧急指征下接受 ICA 检查的患者的多中心、随机临床试验中,比较了选择性转诊策略与直接转诊策略。主要终点是在中位随访 1 年时,复合主要不良心血管事件(盲法判定的死亡、心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛、卒中和紧急/即刻冠状动脉血运重建或心脏住院)的非劣效性,乘法边界为 1.33。

结果

在 22 个研究中心,823 例患者被随机分配至选择性转诊组,808 例患者被随机分配至直接转诊组。在 1 年时,选择性转诊策略达到了 1.33 的非劣效性边界(p = 0.026),且试验随机分组的两组之间事件发生率相似(4.6%比 4.6%;风险比:0.99;95%置信区间:0.66 至 1.47)。在进行 CCTA 后,选择性转诊组中仅 23%的患者进一步接受了 ICA 检查,这一比例低于直接转诊至 ICA 组。与直接转诊至 ICA 组相比,选择性转诊组的冠状动脉血运重建发生率较低(13%比 18%;p < 0.001)。选择性转诊组的 ICA 正常率为 24.6%,而直接转诊至 ICA 组的正常率为 61.1%(p < 0.001)。

结论

在疑似 CAD 且适合接受 ICA 检查的稳定型患者中,选择性转诊和直接转诊策略在 1 年时主要不良心血管事件发生率相似,这表明这两种诊断方法同样有效。在选择性转诊策略中,由于较少使用 ICA,诊断效果更好,这支持了 CCTA 作为一种有效、准确的方法来指导 ICA 检查决策的作用。(选择性冠状动脉造影的冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术[CONSERVE];NCT01810198)

相似文献

1
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.采用 CCTA 选择性转诊与直接转诊对疑似 CAD 行有创冠状动脉造影检查的患者进行对比:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
2
Rationale and design of the Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization: Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Life (CONSERVE) trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影用于选择性心脏导管插入术的原理与设计:与心血管结局、成本效益及生活质量的关系(CONSERVE)试验
Am Heart J. 2017 Apr;186:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Atherosclerosis Imaging Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography in the randomized controlled CONSERVE trial.动脉粥样硬化成像定量计算机断层扫描(AI-QCT)指导随机对照 CONSERVE 试验中侵入性冠状动脉造影的转诊。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 May;46(5):477-483. doi: 10.1002/clc.23995. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
4
The value of Coronary Artery computed Tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected Coronary Artery Disease: CAT-CAD randomized trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描作为疑似冠心病行有创血管造影适应证的稳定型患者一线解剖学检查的价值:CAT-CAD 随机试验。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Nov-Dec;12(6):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的无创血流储备分数:PROMISE 试验的处理和结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;10(11):1350-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.024. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.与心肌灌注成像(MPI)相比,64排无创计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CCTA)的诊断准确性:PICTURE研究,一项前瞻性多中心试验。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jan;24(1):22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
7
Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术作为侵入性诊断和手术程序的守门员:来自多中心 CONFIRM(冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术评估临床结果:国际多中心)登记研究的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 13;60(20):2103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
8
One-year outcomes of CCTA alone versus machine learning-based FFR for coronary artery disease: a single-center, prospective study.单独 CCTA 与基于机器学习的 FFR 对冠状动脉疾病的一年结果:一项单中心、前瞻性研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5179-5188. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08604-x. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
9
Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.计算机断层血管造影引导诊断策略与常规治疗对疑似冠心病患者进行血流储备分数测定的临床结局:FFR(CT)前瞻性纵向试验:结局与资源影响研究
Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3359-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
Clinical effectiveness of coronary computed tomographic angiography in the triage of patients to cardiac catheterization and revascularization after inconclusive stress testing: results of a 2-year prospective trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术在对负荷试验结果不明确的患者进行心脏导管插入术和血运重建分流中的临床有效性:一项为期2年的前瞻性试验结果
J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):701-13. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9117-6. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting trends and clinical impact of high-risk coronary plaques on cardiac CT angiography in CAD-RADS.CAD-RADS中高危冠状动脉斑块在心脏CT血管造影上的报告趋势及临床影响
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11872-y.
2
The Emerging Role of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影在左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的新作用。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 26;26(5):37379. doi: 10.31083/RCM37379. eCollection 2025 May.
3
A systematic review on deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction.
一项关于深度学习辅助冠状动脉CT血管造影术用于斑块和狭窄定量及心脏风险预测的系统评价。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2025 May 2;14:100652. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100652. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Cost-utility of computed tomography in patients with atypical chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial.对临床上因非典型胸痛而转诊进行有创冠状动脉造影的患者进行计算机断层扫描的成本效益:随机对照试验。
Eur Radiol. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11692-0.
5
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-Risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for the CarDIA-AI Randomized Controlled Trial.冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术优化人工智能筛查低风险患者侵入性血管造影的诊断率:心脏人工智能随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 21;14:e71726. doi: 10.2196/71726.
6
Evaluation of Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques in Identifying Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.评估非侵入性诊断技术在识别冠状动脉疾病中的应用:一项系统综述。
Heart Views. 2024 Jul-Sep;25(3):139-151. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_73_24. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
7
Evaluation of the clinical value of CCTA as the preferred screening method in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.评估冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)作为慢性冠状动脉综合征患者首选筛查方法的临床价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04587-x.
8
Real-world application of CCTA with CT-FFR for coronary assessment pre-TAVI: the CT2TAVI study.CT血管造影结合CT血流储备分数在经导管主动脉瓣置换术前冠状动脉评估中的真实世界应用:CT2TAVI研究
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar;41(3):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03333-w. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
9
Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Non-invasive Model-Based Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Prediction.基于非侵入性模型的瞬时无波比预测的不确定性量化与敏感性分析
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2025 Jan;41(1):e3898. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3898.
10
Novel Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography to Determine Ischemic Coronary Stenosis.基于冠状动脉CT血管造影的新型无创血流储备分数用于确定缺血性冠状动脉狭窄
US Cardiol. 2021 Apr 23;15:e06. doi: 10.15420/usc.2020.24. eCollection 2021.