• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职场霸凌受害与包容性卓越之间的不协调。

The incongruity of workplace bullying victimization and inclusive excellence.

作者信息

Dzurec Laura Cox, Kennison Monica, Gillen Patricia

机构信息

School of Nursing, Widener University, Chester, PA.

Nursing Program, Berea College, Berea, KY.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2017 Sep-Oct;65(5):588-596. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.01.012
PMID:28455111
Abstract

PURPOSE

Bullying occurs frequently-and with significant negative outcomes-in workplace settings. Once established, bullying endures in the workplace, requiring the interaction of a bully perpetrator and an intended target who takes on the role of victim. Not every target becomes a victim, however. The purpose of this study is to investigate the processes by which targets, intended objects of bullies' affronts, become victims, those individuals who experience ongoing emotional injury in response to bullies' affronts, and to clarify how bullying victimization impedes inclusive excellence in the workplace.

DESIGN

The design for this study was pragmatic utility, an inductive research approach grounded in assumptions of hermeneutics.

METHODS

The pragmatic utility process involved the investigators' synthesis of descriptions from a broad, interdisciplinary published literature. Integrating knowledge from their previous research and practice experiences with the pragmatic utility process, they derived qualitative features of victims' experiences, differentiating target from victim in bullying encounters.

FINDINGS

For those targets who ultimately are victimized, response to bullies' affronts extends far beyond the immediate present. Redolence of personal, lived experience revives bygone vulnerabilities, and naïve communication and relationship expectations reinforce a long-standing, impoverished sense. That sense couples with workplace dynamics to augment a context of exclusion.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that, as Heidegger contended, we are our histories. Personal history demonstrates a significance influence on the manifestation of bullying victimization, acting to distance them from their workplace peers and to impede inclusive excellence.

摘要

目的

职场霸凌频繁发生,且会产生严重的负面后果。一旦形成,职场霸凌便会持续存在,需要霸凌者与扮演受害者角色的目标对象之间产生互动。然而,并非每个目标对象都会成为受害者。本研究的目的是调查目标对象(即霸凌者攻击的对象)成为受害者(即那些因霸凌者的攻击而遭受持续情感伤害的人)的过程,并阐明职场霸凌受害如何阻碍职场中的包容性卓越。

设计

本研究的设计采用实用主义,这是一种基于诠释学假设的归纳研究方法。

方法

实用主义过程包括研究人员对广泛的跨学科已发表文献中的描述进行综合。他们将先前研究和实践经验中的知识与实用主义过程相结合,得出受害者经历的定性特征,区分霸凌遭遇中的目标对象和受害者。

结果

对于那些最终成为受害者的目标对象来说,对霸凌者攻击的反应远远超出当下。个人生活经历的气息唤起了过去的脆弱性,天真的沟通和关系期望强化了一种长期存在的匮乏感。这种感觉与职场动态相结合,加剧了一种排斥的环境。

结论

研究结果表明,正如海德格尔所主张的,我们就是我们的历史。个人历史对职场霸凌受害的表现具有重大影响,使其与职场同事产生距离,并阻碍包容性卓越。

相似文献

1
The incongruity of workplace bullying victimization and inclusive excellence.职场霸凌受害与包容性卓越之间的不协调。
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Sep-Oct;65(5):588-596. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
2
Unacknowledged threats proffered "in a manner of speaking": recognizing workplace bullying as shaming.未被承认的威胁“以某种方式提出”:将工作场所欺凌视为羞辱。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Jul;46(4):281-91. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12080. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
3
Victimization in the school and the workplace: are there any links?校园与职场中的受侵害情况:二者存在关联吗?
Br J Psychol. 2003 May;94(Pt 2):175-88. doi: 10.1348/000712603321661868.
4
Dyadic nominations of bullying: Comparing types of bullies and their victims.对偶提名的欺凌:比较欺凌者和受害者的类型。
Aggress Behav. 2020 May;46(3):232-243. doi: 10.1002/ab.21884. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully-victims, and bullies in kindergarten.幼儿园中受欺负者、欺负-受欺负者和欺负者的社交行为及同伴关系
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;47(1):45-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01445.x.
6
Why the bully/victim relationship is so pernicious: a gendered perspective on power and animosity among bullies and their victims.为何霸凌者/受害者关系如此有害:从性别角度审视霸凌者及其受害者之间的权力与敌意
Dev Psychopathol. 2014 Aug;26(3):689-704. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000327.
7
Status limbo: analysis of nurse faculty member reports of administrator response to workplace bullying complaints.工作困境:对护理教师报告的行政人员对工作场所欺凌投诉的回应的分析。
J Prof Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;29(5):e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.07.001.
8
Speaking of workplace bullying.说到职场霸凌。
J Prof Nurs. 2012 Jul-Aug;28(4):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.01.004.
9
[The bullied who bullies: the reciprocal relationship between victim and aggressor in workplace bullying situations].[霸凌他人的受霸凌者:职场霸凌情境中受害者与攻击者的相互关系]
Psicothema. 2012;24(3):358-63.
10
Victims, bullies, and their defenders: a longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks.受害者、霸凌者及其维护者:对正向与负向网络共同演化的纵向研究
Dev Psychopathol. 2014 Aug;26(3):645-59. doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000297. Epub 2014 Apr 25.