Derdeyn Colin P, Fiorella David, Lynn Michael J, Turan Tanya N, Cotsonis George A, Lane Bethany F, Montgomery Jean, Janis L Scott, Chimowitz Marc I
From the Departments of Radiology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (C.P.D.); Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Stony Brook (D.F.); Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA (M.J.L., G.A.C., B.F.L., J.M.); Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (T.N.T., M.I.C.); and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.S.J.).
Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1501-1506. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014537. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) and its contribution to nonprocedural symptomatic infarction in the SAMMPRIS trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).
Patients without a periprocedural primary end point were followed up to determine the occurrence of any of the following events: ischemic stroke, cerebral infarct with temporary signs, or transient ischemic attack in the territory of the stented artery. Vascular imaging performed after these events was reviewed for ISR. Annual rates for symptomatic ISR were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Of 183 patients in the stenting group without a periprocedural primary end point, 27 (14.8%) had a symptomatic infarction (stroke or cerebral infarct with temporary signs) and 16 (8.7%) had transient ischemic attack alone in the territory during a median follow-up of 35.0 months. Of the 27 patients with infarctions, 17 (9.3%) had an ischemic stroke and 10 (5.5%) had a cerebral infarct with temporary signs alone. Adequate vascular imaging to evaluate ISR was available in 24 patients with infarctions (showing ISR in 16 [66.7%]) and in 10 patients with transient ischemic attack alone (showing ISR in 8 [80%]). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates (with 95% confidence limits) for symptomatic ISR in the SAMMPRIS stent cohort were 9.6% (6.1%-14.9%), 11.3% (7.5%-17.0%), and 14.0% (9.6%-20.2%), respectively.
Symptomatic ISR occurred in at least 1 of 7 patients in SAMMPRIS by 3 years of follow-up and was likely responsible for the majority of nonprocedural cerebral infarctions.
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00576693.
本研究旨在调查症状性支架内再狭窄(ISR)的发生率及其在SAMMPRIS试验(颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中)中对非手术相关症状性梗死的影响。
对未发生围手术期主要终点事件的患者进行随访,以确定是否发生以下任何事件:缺血性卒中、有短暂症状的脑梗死或支架置入动脉供血区域的短暂性脑缺血发作。对这些事件发生后进行的血管成像检查进行ISR评估。使用Kaplan-Meier估计法计算症状性ISR的年发生率。
在支架置入组中,183例未发生围手术期主要终点事件的患者,在中位随访35.0个月期间,27例(14.8%)发生了症状性梗死(卒中或有短暂症状的脑梗死),16例(8.7%)仅在该区域发生了短暂性脑缺血发作。在27例发生梗死的患者中,17例(9.3%)发生了缺血性卒中,10例(5.5%)仅发生了有短暂症状的脑梗死。24例发生梗死的患者(16例[66.7%]显示有ISR)和10例仅发生短暂性脑缺血发作的患者(8例[80%]显示有ISR)可获得评估ISR的充分血管成像检查。SAMMPRIS支架队列中症状性ISR的1年、2年和3年发生率(95%置信区间)分别为9.6%(6.1%-14.9%)、11.3%(7.5%-17.0%)和14.0%(9.6%-20.2%)。
到随访3年时,SAMMPRIS试验中至少每7例患者中有1例发生症状性ISR,且症状性ISR可能是大多数非手术相关脑梗死的原因。