• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SAMMPRIS试验医疗组中复发性缺血性卒中的相关因素。

Factors Associated With Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Medical Group of the SAMMPRIS Trial.

作者信息

Waters Michael F, Hoh Brian L, Lynn Michael J, Kwon Hyung-Min, Turan Tanya N, Derdeyn Colin P, Fiorella David, Khanna Anna, Sheehan Tiffany O, Lane Bethany F, Janis Scott, Montgomery Jean, Chimowitz Marc I

机构信息

Department of Neurology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville2Department of Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.

Department of Neurosurgery, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2016 Mar;73(3):308-15. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4315.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4315
PMID:26747792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5576955/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial showed that aggressive medical therapy was more effective than stenting for preventing stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. However, 15% of patients in the medical group still experienced a primary end point during a median follow-up of 32.7 months.

OBJECTIVE

To determine baseline features that were associated with a high rate of a primary end point in the medical arm of the SAMMPRIS Trial.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A post hoc analysis of patients in the medical arm only of the SAMMPRIS trial. Enrollment occurred between October 2008 and April 2013 and included 227 patients randomized to medical management alone. Baseline demographic features, vascular risk factors, qualifying event, brain imaging, and angiographic features were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariable proportional hazard regression modeling was performed to relate baseline features to the time until a primary end point. The post hoc analysis was conducted from November 2014 to June 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

The SAMMPRIS Trial compared stenting with aggressive medical management in patients with a stroke or transient ischemic attack attributed to 70% to 99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was any of the following: stroke or death within 30 days of enrollment, ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery beyond 30 days after enrollment, or any stroke or death within 30 days after stenting a patient in the medical group during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included in the study, 82 of whom were female, and the mean (SD) age was 59.5 (11.8) years. Being female (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 0.96-3.7), having diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9-3.5), not taking a statin at enrollment (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.7), stroke as the qualifying event (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.03-6.0), Rankin grade of 1 or greater (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.9-5.5), old infarct in the territory of the stenotic artery (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.1), and greater than 80% stenosis (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7) were associated (P < .10) with higher risk on bivariate analysis. Factors that were significantly associated with a primary end point on multivariable analyses were old infarct in the territory (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3; P = .006), stroke as the qualifying event (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-7.7; P = .03), and no statin use at enrollment (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.2; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Old infarct in the territory of the stenosis, new stroke presentation, and absence of statin use at enrollment were independently associated with high rates of the primary end point in the medical group in the SAMMPRIS Trial. These features may be useful for selecting high-risk patients for future clinical trials evaluating alternative therapies for intracranial stenosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00576693.

摘要

重要性

颅内狭窄预防复发性卒中的支架置入与积极药物治疗(SAMMPRIS)试验表明,对于有症状的颅内狭窄患者,积极药物治疗在预防卒中方面比支架置入更有效。然而,在中位随访32.7个月期间,药物治疗组有15%的患者仍出现主要终点事件。

目的

确定与SAMMPRIS试验药物治疗组主要终点事件高发生率相关的基线特征。

设计、地点和参与者:仅对SAMMPRIS试验药物治疗组患者进行的事后分析。研究对象于2008年10月至2013年4月入组,包括227例随机接受单纯药物治疗的患者。分析了基线人口统计学特征、血管危险因素、入选事件、脑成像和血管造影特征。采用双变量和多变量比例风险回归模型,将基线特征与至主要终点事件的时间相关联。事后分析于2014年11月至2015年6月进行。

干预措施

SAMMPRIS试验比较了对主要颅内动脉狭窄70%至99%所致卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者进行支架置入与积极药物治疗的效果。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为以下任何一种情况:入组后30天内发生卒中或死亡、入组30天后在有症状颅内动脉供血区域发生缺血性卒中、或在随访期间对药物治疗组患者进行支架置入后30天内发生任何卒中或死亡。

结果

本研究共纳入227例患者,其中82例为女性,平均(标准差)年龄为59.5(11.8)岁。双变量分析显示,女性(风险比[HR],1.9;95%置信区间[CI],0.96 - 3.7)、患有糖尿病(HR,1.8;95% CI,0.9 - 3.5)、入组时未服用他汀类药物(HR,2.6;95% CI,1.2 - 5.7)、入选事件为卒中(HR,2.5;95% CI,1.03 - 6.0)、Rankin分级为1级或更高(HR,2.3;95% CI,0.9 - 5.5)、狭窄动脉供血区域有陈旧性梗死(HR,2.6;95% CI,1.3 - 5.1)以及狭窄程度大于80%(HR,1.9;95% CI,0.9 - 3.7)与较高风险相关(P < 0.10)。多变量分析中与主要终点事件显著相关的因素为供血区域有陈旧性梗死(HR,2.6;95% CI,1.3 - 5.3;P = 0.006)、入选事件为卒中(HR,3.0;95% CI,1.1 - 7.7;P = 0.03)以及入组时未使用他汀类药物(HR,2.4;95% CI,1.1 - 5.2;P = 0.03)。

结论与意义

在SAMMPRIS试验中,狭窄供血区域的陈旧性梗死、新发卒中表现以及入组时未使用他汀类药物与药物治疗组主要终点事件的高发生率独立相关。这些特征可能有助于为未来评估颅内狭窄替代治疗方法的临床试验选择高危患者。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00576693。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/5576955/a2888f97b1be/nihms899986f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/5576955/a2888f97b1be/nihms899986f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/5576955/a2888f97b1be/nihms899986f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Associated With Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Medical Group of the SAMMPRIS Trial.SAMMPRIS试验医疗组中复发性缺血性卒中的相关因素。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Mar;73(3):308-15. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4315.
2
Frequency, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Coexistent Small Vessel Disease and Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: Results From the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial.并存小血管疾病和颅内动脉狭窄的频率、危险因素及转归:颅内狭窄支架置入和积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中(SAMMPRIS)试验结果
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Jan;73(1):36-42. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3145.
3
Nonprocedural Symptomatic Infarction and In-Stent Restenosis After Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting in the SAMMPRIS Trial (Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for the Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis).SAMMPRIS试验(颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中)中颅内血管成形术和支架置入术后的非手术性症状性梗死和支架内再狭窄
Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1501-1506. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014537. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Balloon Angioplasty vs Medical Management for Intracranial Artery Stenosis: The BASIS Randomized Clinical Trial.球囊血管成形术与药物治疗颅内动脉狭窄的比较:BASIS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Oct 1;332(13):1059-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.12829.
5
Effect of Stenting Plus Medical Therapy vs Medical Therapy Alone on Risk of Stroke and Death in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: The CASSISS Randomized Clinical Trial.支架置入联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗对症状性颅内狭窄患者卒中和死亡风险的影响:CASSISS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):534-542. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12000.
6
Do Patient Characteristics Explain the Differences in Outcome Between Medically Treated Patients in SAMMPRIS and WASID?患者特征能否解释SAMMPRIS和WASID研究中接受药物治疗患者的结局差异?
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2562-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009656. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
7
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?支架置入术与强化药物治疗试验是否支持对颅内狭窄亚组进行支架置入?
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
8
Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS).颅内支架置入术治疗颅内狭窄患者的围手术期卒中的详细分析——支架置入与强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发研究(SAMMPRIS)。
Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2682-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
Impact of the New American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Definition of Stroke on the Results of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial.美国心脏协会/美国中风协会中风新定义对颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性中风试验结果的影响
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Jan;26(1):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.038. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.颅内动脉狭窄的血管内支架置入与积极药物治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-Related Difference in Outcomes of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的远程缺血预处理结局中的性别差异
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 Jun 6;6:0275. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0275. eCollection 2025.
2
Higher Time to Peak after Stent Implantation in Symptomatic High-Grade Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis is Related to In-Stent Restenosis.症状性重度颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者支架植入术后达到峰值时间延长与支架内再狭窄有关。
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s12975-025-01346-0.
3
Stenting for Symptomatic Severe Intracranial Arterial Stenosis with Downstream Perfusion Deficit in Anterior Circulation: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the Stenting Versus Aggressive Medical Therapy Trial Support Stenting for Subgroups With Intracranial Stenosis?支架置入术与强化药物治疗试验是否支持对颅内狭窄亚组进行支架置入?
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3282-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009846. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
2
Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial.高风险颅内动脉狭窄患者(SAMMPRIS)强化药物治疗联合或不联合支架置入的疗效:一项随机试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 25;383(9914):333-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
3
前循环有下游灌注缺损的症状性严重颅内动脉狭窄的支架置入术:一项回顾性倾向匹配研究
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 May;48(5):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-03969-0. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Arterial Lesion Location and Outcomes of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病的动脉病变位置与预后
Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2024 Sep;4(5). doi: 10.1161/SVIN.124.001344. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
5
Qualifying Event and Recurrence of Ischemic Stroke in Symptomatic Artery Occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of CMOSS.症状性动脉闭塞患者的 qualifying event 和缺血性脑卒中复发:CMOSS 的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e034056. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034056. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Association of Morphology of Lenticulostriate Arteries and Proximal Plaque Characteristics With Single Subcortical Infarction: A Whole-Brain High-Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging Study.纹状体动脉形态与近段斑块特征与单发皮质下梗死的关系:全脑高分辨率血管壁成像研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e032856. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032856. Epub 2024 May 10.
7
Association of brain arterial diameters with demographic and anatomical factors in a multi-national pooled analysis of cohort studies.多中心队列研究的荟萃分析:脑动脉直径与人口统计学和解剖学因素的关系。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Jun;37(3):304-313. doi: 10.1177/19714009231224429. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
8
A non-linear relationship between lesion length and risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia after stenting for symptomatic intracranial stenosis with hemodynamic impairment.对于有血流动力学损害的症状性颅内狭窄患者,支架置入术后病变长度与复发性脑缺血风险之间存在非线性关系。
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1122708. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122708. eCollection 2023.
9
Efficacy and safety of low dose aspirin plus clopidogrel in the treatment of elderly patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.小剂量阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷治疗老年症状性颅内动脉狭窄患者的疗效与安全性
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 2;14:1060733. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1060733. eCollection 2023.
10
Rationale and design of a randomised double-blind 2×2 factorial trial comparing the effect of a 3-month intensive statin and antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute mild ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA with intracranial or extracranial atherosclerosis (INSPIRES).随机双盲 2×2 析因试验的原理和设计,比较急性轻度缺血性卒中和伴有颅内或颅外动脉粥样硬化的高危 TIA 患者 3 个月强化他汀和抗血小板治疗的效果(INSPIRES)。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Jun;8(3):249-258. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002084. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
Rationale, design, and implementation of aggressive risk factor management in the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Prevention of Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial.
颅内狭窄支架置入与积极药物治疗预防复发性卒中(SAMMPRIS)试验中积极危险因素管理的原理、设计与实施
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):e51-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966911.
4
Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS).颅内支架置入术治疗颅内狭窄患者的围手术期卒中的详细分析——支架置入与强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发研究(SAMMPRIS)。
Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2682-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661173. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
5
Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.颅内动脉狭窄的血管内支架置入与积极药物治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
6
Design of the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis trial.颅内狭窄患者支架置入和强化药物治疗预防卒中复发试验的设计。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;20(4):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.001.
7
Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts.颅内动脉粥样硬化:当前的概念。
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1 Suppl):S20-3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597278. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
8
Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier.大动脉颅内闭塞性疾病:全球负担沉重,但却是一个相对被忽视的领域。
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2396-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505776. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
9
A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study.一种新型自膨式镍钛合金支架用于治疗药物难治性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄:Wingspan研究
Stroke. 2007 May;38(5):1531-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.477711. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
10
Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.有症状的颅内动脉狭窄区域缺血性卒中的预测因素。
Circulation. 2006 Jan 31;113(4):555-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.578229. Epub 2006 Jan 23.