Murtadha Linda, Kwok Jerry
Senior Specialty Dentist in Oral Surgery, Oral Surgery Department, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Consultant Oral Surgeon, Oral Surgery Department, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;75(9):1817-1826. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.049. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
To determine the long-term survival and outcomes of 252 autotransplanted teeth with a novel root canal therapy (RCT) and follow-up protocol and to establish whether elective RCT after autotransplantation is routinely required for teeth with complete root formation.
A retrospective analysis of 209 patients 10 to 58 years old, with a total of 252 autotransplants was carried out with a minimum observational period of 1 year and a maximum period of 29 years. Patients were reviewed at specified intervals. Only the teeth showing any radiographic or clinical signs of internal resorption (IR), external resorption (ER), or pulpal necrosis underwent RCT. A failure was considered the loss or extraction of the autotransplanted tooth.
Ten of the 252 autotransplants constituted failures, with 249, 190, 155, 97, 70, and 35 teeth surviving at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years, respectively; the remainder were lost to follow-up. Eighteen percent of teeth (n = 46) showed radiographic signs of IR, ER, and apical pathology (AP). Most cases of ER were observed by 3 years (18 of 28 teeth) and then at 5 to -8 years. Only 3 teeth showed signs of IR, which were observed within 5 years. Most cases of AP were observed within the first year (8 of 15 teeth) and then at 3 to 6 years. Five teeth showed signs of pulp obliteration or sclerosis and did not require RCT, with a maximum period of 16 years after identification of sclerosis. Retrospective analysis of the data showed that 184 autotransplanted teeth had complete root formation and 68 had incomplete root formation at the time of autotransplantation. Of the teeth that were followed for at least 5 years, 59.3% had complete root formation with no signs of pathology and required no RCT.
Despite the limitation of this long-term study of patients lost to follow-up, the results suggest that, with close monitoring, some autotransplanted teeth with complete root formation that do not undergo RCT could have the potential for revascularization. Hence, one could reconsider the protocol of routinely providing RCT after autotransplantation. Future long-term studies will be beneficial to assess the vascularity of autotransplanted teeth using Doppler flowmetry with a larger cohort of patients.
通过一种新型根管治疗(RCT)和随访方案来确定252颗自体移植牙的长期存活率和治疗结果,并确定对于牙根完全形成的牙齿,自体移植后是否常规需要进行选择性RCT。
对209例年龄在10至58岁之间、共252颗自体移植牙进行回顾性分析,观察期最短为1年,最长为29年。在特定间隔对患者进行复查。仅对出现任何内部吸收(IR)、外部吸收(ER)或牙髓坏死的影像学或临床体征的牙齿进行RCT。自体移植牙的丢失或拔除被视为治疗失败。
252颗自体移植牙中有10颗治疗失败,分别有249、190、155、97、70和35颗牙齿在1、2、3、5、7和10年时存活;其余患者失访。18%的牙齿(n = 46)出现IR、ER和根尖病变(AP)的影像学体征。大多数ER病例在3年时被观察到(28颗牙齿中的18颗),然后在5至8年时出现。只有3颗牙齿出现IR体征,在5年内被观察到。大多数AP病例在第一年被观察到(15颗牙齿中的8颗),然后在3至6年时出现。5颗牙齿出现牙髓闭塞或硬化体征,不需要进行RCT,在确定硬化后最长观察期为16年。对数据的回顾性分析显示,184颗自体移植牙在自体移植时牙根完全形成,68颗牙根未完全形成。在至少随访5年的牙齿中,59.3%牙根完全形成,无病理体征,不需要进行RCT。
尽管这项长期研究存在患者失访的局限性,但结果表明,通过密切监测,一些牙根完全形成且未进行RCT的自体移植牙可能具有血管再生的潜力。因此,可以重新考虑自体移植后常规进行RCT的方案。未来的长期研究将有助于使用多普勒血流仪对更多患者队列进行评估,以了解自体移植牙的血管情况。