Sritharan Jeavana, Demers Paul A, Harris Shelley A, Cole Donald C, Peters Cheryl E, Villeneuve Paul J
Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
Occupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;48:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
The etiology of prostate cancer continues to be poorly understood, including the role of occupation. Past Canadian studies have not been able to thoroughly examine prostate cancer by occupation with detailed information on individual level factors.
Occupation, industry and prostate cancer were examined using data from the National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance System, a large population-based case-control study conducted across eight Canadian provinces from 1994 to 1997. This analysis included 1737 incident cases and 1803 controls aged 50 to 79 years. Lifetime occupational histories were used to group individuals by occupation and industry employment. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and adjustments were made for known and possible risk factors.
By occupation, elevated risks were observed in farming and farm management (OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.84), armed forces (OR=1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.65) and legal work (OR=2.58, 95% CI 1.05-6.35). Elevated risks were also observed in office work (OR=1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.43) and plumbing (OR=1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.93) and with ≥10 years duration of employment. Decreased risks were observed in senior management (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91), construction management (OR=0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.94) and travel work (OR=0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.88). Industry results were similar to occupation results, except for an elevated risk in forestry/logging (OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.06-2.25) and a decreased risk in primary metal products (OR=0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.96).
This study presents associations between occupation, industry and prostate cancer, while accounting for individual level factors. Further research is needed on potential job-specific exposures and screening behaviours.
前列腺癌的病因仍未得到充分了解,包括职业所起的作用。加拿大过去的研究未能利用个体层面因素的详细信息,按职业对前列腺癌进行全面研究。
利用国家强化癌症监测系统的数据,对职业、行业与前列腺癌进行研究。该系统是1994年至1997年在加拿大八个省份开展的一项大型基于人群的病例对照研究。本分析纳入了1737例年龄在50至79岁之间的新发病例和1803名对照。利用终生职业史按职业和行业就业情况对个体进行分组。计算比值比和95%置信区间,并对已知和可能的风险因素进行调整。
按职业划分,务农和农场管理(比值比=1.37,95%置信区间1.02 - 1.84)、武装部队(比值比=1.33,95%置信区间1.06 - 1.65)以及法律工作(比值比=2.58,95%置信区间1.05 - 6.35)的风险升高。办公室工作(比值比=1.20,95%置信区间1.00 - 1.43)、管道工程(比值比=1.77,95%置信区间1.07 - 2.93)以及就业时长≥10年的人群风险也升高。高级管理(比值比=0.65%,95%置信区间0.46 - 0.91)、建筑管理(比值比=0.69,95%置信区间0.50 - 0.94)以及旅行工作(比值比=0.37,95%置信区间0.