Elhanan E, Boaz M, Schwartz I, Schwartz D, Chernin G, Soetendorp H, Gal Oz A, Agbaria A, Weinstein T
Nephrology Department, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman st., 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Epidemiology and Research Unit, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Feb;22(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1416-7. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
Dialysis patients have a suboptimal response to hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination. This study aimed to compare the immunogenicity of two vaccines: the third-generation Sci-B-Vac™ vs. the second-generation Engerix B. The cohort included two groups of dialysis patients: naïve and previously vaccinated non-responders. Primary endpoints were antibody titers ≥10 IU/L at 3 and 7 month post-vaccination. Secondary objectives were seroprotection rates in vaccine-naïve patients and in previously vaccinated non-responders.
Eighty-six patients were assigned to vaccine (Sci-B-Vac™ or Engerix B) using computer-generated randomization, stratified by age, gender, diabetes, and previous HBV vaccination. Sci-B-Vac™ was administered in three doses, 10 μg, at 0, 1, and 6 months in naïve patients; or 20 μg in previously vaccinated non-responders. Engerix B included four doses, 40 μg at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months.
Each group had 43 patients. Seroconversion was 69.8% with Engerix B vs. 73.2% with Sci-B-Vac™. Antibody titers at 7 months were higher with Sci-B-Vac™ (266.4 ± 383.9, median 53.4) than with Engerix (193.2 ± 328.9, median 19). However, these differences were not significant, perhaps due to a suboptimal sample size.
This study suggests comparable immunogenicity for both vaccines. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in seroconversion by vaccine type. It is noteworthy that naïve patients were vaccinated with a standard dose of Sci-B-Vac™, while Engerix B was administered at a double dose. Similarly, although mean antibody titer levels in the Sci-B-Vac™ group were higher than in the Engerix group, this difference did not reach significance. Consequently, a future clinical trial should recruit a larger cohort of patients, using a standard double-dose protocol in both groups.
透析患者对乙型肝炎(HBV)疫苗接种的反应欠佳。本研究旨在比较两种疫苗的免疫原性:第三代Sci-B-Vac™与第二代Engerix B。该队列包括两组透析患者:未接种过疫苗的患者和先前接种但无反应的患者。主要终点是接种疫苗后3个月和7个月时抗体滴度≥10 IU/L。次要目标是未接种过疫苗患者和先前接种但无反应患者的血清保护率。
86名患者通过计算机生成的随机分组法被分配至疫苗组(Sci-B-Vac™或Engerix B),按年龄、性别、糖尿病和既往HBV疫苗接种情况进行分层。未接种过疫苗的患者在0、1和6个月时接种三剂10μg的Sci-B-Vac™;先前接种但无反应的患者接种20μg。Engerix B包括四剂,在0、1、2和6个月时各接种40μg。
每组有43名患者。Engerix B的血清转化率为69.8%,Sci-B-Vac™为73.2%。Sci-B-Vac™在7个月时的抗体滴度(266.4±383.9,中位数53.4)高于Engerix(193.2±328.9,中位数19)。然而,这些差异并不显著,可能是由于样本量欠佳。
本研究表明两种疫苗的免疫原性相当。因此,我们不能拒绝关于疫苗类型导致血清转化率无差异的原假设。值得注意的是,未接种过疫苗的患者接种的是标准剂量的Sci-B-Vac™,而Engerix B接种的是双倍剂量。同样,尽管Sci-B-Vac™组的平均抗体滴度水平高于Engerix组,但这种差异未达到显著水平。因此,未来的临床试验应招募更多患者,两组均采用标准的双倍剂量方案。