Medeiros Gustavo C, Torres Albina R, Boisseau Christina L, Leppink Eric W, Eisen Jane L, Fontenelle Leonardo F, do Rosário Maria C, Mancebo Maria C, Rasmussen Steven A, Ferrão Ygor A, Grant Jon E
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Botucatu Medical School-São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
Although OCD is a global problem, the literature comparing, in a direct and standardized way, the manifestations across countries is scarce. Therefore, questions remain as to whether some important clinical findings are replicable worldwide, especially in the developing world. The objective of this study was to perform a clinical comparison of OCD patients recruited in the United States (U.S.) and Brazil. Our sample consisted of 1187 adult, treatment-seeking OCD outpatients from the U.S. (n=236) and Brazil (n=951). With regards to the demographics, U.S. participants with OCD were older, more likely to identify as Caucasian, had achieved a higher educational level, and were less likely to be partnered when compared to Brazilians. Concerning the clinical variables, after controlling for demographics the two samples presented largely similar profiles. Brazilian participants with OCD, however, endorsed significantly greater rates of generalized anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, whereas U.S. subjects were significantly more likely to endorse a lifetime history of addiction (alcohol-use and substance-use disorders). This is the largest direct cross-cultural comparison to date in the OCD field. Our results provide much needed insight regarding the development of culture-sensitive treatments.
尽管强迫症是一个全球性问题,但以直接且标准化的方式比较各国临床表现的文献却很匮乏。因此,一些重要的临床发现是否在全球范围内都可重复,尤其是在发展中世界,仍是个问题。本研究的目的是对在美国和巴西招募的强迫症患者进行临床比较。我们的样本包括来自美国(n = 236)和巴西(n = 951)的1187名寻求治疗的成年强迫症门诊患者。在人口统计学方面,与巴西人相比,美国的强迫症参与者年龄更大,更有可能认定自己为白种人,教育水平更高,且结婚的可能性更小。关于临床变量,在控制了人口统计学因素后,两个样本的概况大致相似。然而,巴西的强迫症参与者中,广泛性焦虑障碍和创伤后应激障碍的发生率显著更高,而美国受试者有终生成瘾史(酒精使用障碍和物质使用障碍)的可能性则显著更高。这是迄今为止强迫症领域最大规模的直接跨文化比较。我们的结果为开发对文化敏感的治疗方法提供了急需的见解。