Kamath Mohan S, Chittawar Priya Bhave, Kirubakaran Richard, Mascarenhas Mariano
Reproductive Medicine Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Department of Reproductive Medicine, Bansal Hospital, Bhopal, India.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jul;214:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a glycoprotein, has been used in women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). We decided to undertake a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of G-CSF in women with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) undergoing ART. The outcomes included an increase in endometrial thickness, live birth, clinical pregnancy rates and adverse effects. We included two trials evaluating women with thin endometrium and another two trials evaluating women with RIF. The pooled data did not reveal statistically significant increase in endometrial thickness following G-CSF in women with thin endometrium (mean difference 0.47, 95% CI -1.36-2.31; I 82%). However significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate was noted (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.09-5.40; I 0%) following G-CSF compared to no intervention and quality of evidence for both these outcomes was very low. In RIF population, the administration of G-CSF was associated with a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate compared to no intervention with pooled risk ratio of 2.51 (95% CI 1.36-4.63; I 0%) and quality of evidence being low. Findings of current review suggest a possible benefit of G-CSF in women with thin endometrium undergoing ART and RIF. However these findings need to be further validated in larger trials before G-CSF can be used in routine clinical practice.
粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)是一种糖蛋白,已被应用于接受辅助生殖技术(ART)的女性。我们决定进行一项系统评价,以评估G-CSF对接受ART且子宫内膜薄和反复种植失败(RIF)的女性的有效性。结局指标包括子宫内膜厚度增加、活产、临床妊娠率及不良反应。我们纳入了两项评估子宫内膜薄的女性的试验,以及另外两项评估RIF女性的试验。汇总数据显示,对于子宫内膜薄的女性,G-CSF治疗后子宫内膜厚度未显示出统计学上的显著增加(平均差0.47,95%CI -1.36至2.31;I² 82%)。然而,与未干预相比,G-CSF治疗后的临床妊娠率显著更高(RR 2.43,95%CI 1.09至5.40;I² 0%),且这两个结局的证据质量都非常低。在RIF人群中,与未干预相比,G-CSF治疗与显著更高的临床妊娠率相关,汇总风险比为2.51(95%CI 1.36至4.63;I² 0%),证据质量低。当前评价的结果表明,G-CSF可能对接受ART且子宫内膜薄和RIF的女性有益。然而,在G-CSF可用于常规临床实践之前,这些发现需要在更大规模的试验中进一步验证。