Suppr超能文献

复发性胚胎植入失败的干预措施:一项伞状综述。

Interventions for recurrent embryo implantation failure: An umbrella review.

作者信息

Almohammadi Abdulla, Choucair Fadi, Khan Khalid S, Bueno-Cavanillas Aurora, Cano-Ibáñez Naomi

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Unit, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 May;169(2):539-556. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16066. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) has a multifactorial etiology. An umbrella review was undertaken to evaluate the multiple proposed interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and assess the strength of evidence of interventions for RIF from published systematic reviews (SR) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

SEARCH STRATEGY

After prospective registration (PROSPERO CRD42023414255), a systematic search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, Scopus and Medline from inception until March 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

SRs of RCTs, with or without meta-analyses (MA), were included if they reported clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) or live birth rates (LBR).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodological quality of the included SRs was appraised independently in duplicate using the AMSTAR 2 tool. For each intervention, the MAs of RCTs with statistically significant improvements were counted as a percentage of the total assessing the strength of evidence using the GRADE system.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 47 SRs were included: 32 reviews covered immunomodulatory interventions, 10 (68 RCTs) covered uterine and endometrial interventions, one covered antibiotics, and four (69 RCTs) addressed mixed approaches, including laboratory interventions. AMSTAR 2 appraised 41 (88%) SRs as critically low or low, and 6 (12%) as moderate or high in quality. The SRs often had a level of overlap of RCTs (median 33.3%), inconsistent definitions of RIF, and varied comparisons for the interventions. Considering the significant meta-analytic evidence of high-moderate GRADE strength: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) showed improvement in CPR in 9/13 (69.2%) MAs and LBR in 1/7 (14%); intralipid infusion showed improvement in CPR in 4/6 (57.14%) MAs and LBR in 3/4 (75%); peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) showed improvement in CPR in 4/8 (50%) MAs and LBR 3/5 (60%); platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intervention showed improvement in CPR in 6/10 (60%) MAs and LBR in 1/5 (20%); human chorionic gonadotropins showed improvement in CPR in 3/3 (100%) MAs; growth hormone showed improvement in CPR in 1/1 (100%) MA; low molecular weight heparin showed improvement in CPR in 1/1 (100%) MAs and LBR in 1/2 (50%); hysteroscopy showed improvement in CPR in 1/2 (50%) MAs; and, intentional endometrial injury showed improvement in CPR in 3/4 (75%) MAs and LBR in 2/3 (66.66%).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence syntheses of RCTs evaluating interventions for RIF suggest a consistent direction, with high to moderate strength, indicating that immunomodulatory treatments, including G-CSF, PBMC, PRP, intralipid infusion, and intentional endometrial injury are likely to be effective. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the generally low methodological quality of the included studies and the clinical heterogeneity observed in most SRs.

摘要

背景

反复种植失败(RIF)病因多因素。进行一项汇总分析以评估多种提出的干预措施。

目的

总结并评估已发表的随机临床试验(RCT)系统评价(SR)中针对RIF干预措施的证据强度。

检索策略

在进行前瞻性注册(PROSPERO CRD42023414255)后,从创刊至2024年3月在Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和Medline进行了系统检索。

入选标准

纳入报告临床妊娠率(CPR)或活产率(LBR)的RCT的SR,无论是否进行荟萃分析(MA)。

数据收集与分析

使用AMSTAR 2工具对纳入的SR的方法学质量进行独立的双人评估。对于每种干预措施,将具有统计学显著改善的RCT的荟萃分析作为使用GRADE系统评估证据强度的总数的百分比进行计数。

主要结果

共纳入47项SR:32项综述涵盖免疫调节干预措施,10项(68项RCT)涵盖子宫和子宫内膜干预措施,1项涵盖抗生素,4项(69项RCT)涉及混合方法,包括实验室干预措施。AMSTAR 2将41项(88%)SR评估为质量极低或低,6项(12%)评估为质量中等或高。这些SR通常存在RCT的重叠水平(中位数33.3%)、RIF定义不一致以及干预措施的比较各异。考虑到具有中高GRADE强度的显著荟萃分析证据:粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在9/13(69.2%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善,在1/7(14%)中显示LBR改善;脂肪乳输注在4/6(57.14%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善,在3/4(75%)中显示LBR改善;外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)在4/8(50%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善,在3/5(60%)中显示LBR改善;富血小板血浆(PRP)干预在6/10(60%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善,在1/5(20%)中显示LBR改善;人绒毛膜促性腺激素在3/3(100%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善;生长激素在1/1(100%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善;低分子量肝素在1/1(100%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善,在1/2(50%)中显示LBR改善;宫腔镜检查在1/2(50%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善;故意子宫内膜损伤在3/4(75%)的荟萃分析中显示CPR改善,在2/3(66.66%)中显示LBR改善。

结论

评估RIF干预措施的RCT证据综合表明方向一致,强度为中高,表明包括G-CSF、PBMC、PRP、脂肪乳输注和故意子宫内膜损伤在内的免疫调节治疗可能有效。然而,由于纳入研究的方法学质量普遍较低以及大多数SR中观察到的临床异质性,该结论应谨慎解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302e/12011071/f272db4c4764/IJGO-169-539-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验