Kohan Luke C, Nagarajan Vijaiganesh, Millard Michael A, Loguidice Michael J, Fauber Nancy M, Keeley Ellen C
Division of Cardiology.
Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Apr 18;13:139-142. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S132405. eCollection 2017.
To assess if a change in our cardiology fellowship program impacted our ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program.
Fellows covering the cardiac care unit were spending excessive hours in the hospital while on call, resulting in increased duty hours violations. A night float fellow system was started on July 1, 2012, allowing the cardiac care unit fellow to sign out to a night float fellow at 5:30 pm. The night float fellow remained in-house until the morning.
We performed a retrospective study assessing symptom onset to arrival, arterial access to first device, and door-to-balloon (D2B) times, in consecutive STEMI patients presenting to our emergency department before and after initiation of the night float fellow system.
From 2009 to 2013, 208 STEMI patients presented to our emergency department and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. There was no difference in symptom onset to arrival (150±102 minutes vs 154±122 minutes, =0.758), arterial access to first device (12±8 minutes vs 11±7 minutes, =0.230), or D2B times (50±32 minutes vs 52±34 minutes, =0.681) during regular working hours. However, there was a significant decrease in D2B times seen during off-hours (72±33 minutes vs 49±15 minutes, =0.007). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (11% vs 8%, =0.484) or need for intra-aortic balloon pump placement (7% vs 8%, =0.793).
In academic medical centers, in-house cardiology fellow coverage during off-hours may expedite care of STEMI patients.
评估我们心脏病学 fellowship 项目的一项改变是否对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)项目产生影响。
负责心脏监护病房的研究员在值班时在医院花费的时间过长,导致违反值班时间规定的情况增多。2012 年 7 月 1 日开始实行夜间值班研究员制度,心脏监护病房的研究员下午 5:30 可将工作交接给夜间值班研究员。夜间值班研究员留在医院直至早晨。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,评估在实行夜间值班研究员制度前后,连续入住我院急诊科的 STEMI 患者从症状发作到入院、从动脉穿刺到首次使用器械以及门球时间(D2B)。
2009 年至 2013 年,208 例 STEMI 患者入住我院急诊科并接受了直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。正常工作时间内,从症状发作到入院时间(150±102 分钟 vs 154±122 分钟,P = 0.758)、从动脉穿刺到首次使用器械时间(12±8 分钟 vs 11±7 分钟,P = 0.230)或 D2B 时间(50±32 分钟 vs 52±34 分钟,P = 0.681)均无差异。然而,非工作时间的 D2B 时间显著缩短(72±33 分钟 vs 49±15 分钟,P = 0.007)。住院死亡率(11% vs 8%,P = 0.484)或主动脉内球囊反搏置入需求(7% vs 8%,P = 0.793)无差异。
在学术医疗中心,非工作时间安排心脏病学研究员在医院值班可能会加快 STEMI 患者的治疗。