• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决句子理解中句法与合理性之间的冲突

Resolving Conflicts Between Syntax and Plausibility in Sentence Comprehension.

作者信息

Andrews Glenda, Ogden Jessica E, Halford Graeme S

机构信息

Menzies Institute of Health Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):11-27. doi: 10.5709/acp-0203-8. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.5709/acp-0203-8
PMID:28458748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5404470/
Abstract

Comprehension of plausible and implausible object- and subject-relative clause sentences with and without prepositional phrases was examined. Undergraduates read each sentence then evaluated a statement as consistent or inconsistent with the sentence. Higher acceptance of consistent than inconsistent statements indicated reliance on . Higher acceptance of plausible than implausible statements reflected reliance on . There was greater reliance on semantic plausibility and lesser reliance on syntactic analysis for more complex object-relatives and sentences with prepositional phrases than for less complex subject-relatives and sentences without prepositional phrases. Comprehension accuracy and confidence were lower when syntactic analysis and semantic plausibility yielded conflicting interpretations. The conflict effect on comprehension was significant for complex sentences but not for less complex sentences. Working memory capacity predicted resolution of the conflict in more and less complex items only when sentences and statements were presented sequentially. Fluid intelligence predicted resolution of the conflict in more and less complex items under sequential and simultaneous presentation. Domain-general processes appear to be involved in resolving syntax-plausibility conflicts in sentence comprehension.

摘要

研究了包含和不包含介词短语的合理与不合理的宾语关系从句和主语关系从句句子的理解情况。本科生阅读每个句子,然后评估一个陈述与该句子是否一致。对一致陈述的接受度高于不一致陈述表明依赖于……。对合理陈述的接受度高于不合理陈述反映了对……的依赖。与不太复杂的主语关系从句和不包含介词短语的句子相比,对于更复杂的宾语关系从句和包含介词短语的句子,对语义合理性的依赖更大,对句法分析的依赖更小。当句法分析和语义合理性产生冲突的解释时,理解准确性和信心较低。冲突对理解的影响在复杂句子中显著,但在不太复杂的句子中不显著。只有当句子和陈述按顺序呈现时,工作记忆容量才能预测复杂和不太复杂项目中冲突的解决。在顺序和同时呈现的情况下,流体智力可以预测复杂和不太复杂项目中冲突的解决。领域通用过程似乎参与了句子理解中句法-合理性冲突的解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/621226cfe110/acp-13-011-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/48c867ca027f/acp-13-011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/2c7fdd3fd7b7/acp-13-011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/ab47d7fb70b3/acp-13-011-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/23056038f35e/acp-13-011-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/9a18ed70408f/acp-13-011-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/442d407d50ee/acp-13-011-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/dc92b8adad71/acp-13-011-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/716d8e4040c0/acp-13-011-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/48207fbe0261/acp-13-011-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/5eab2cea5f3b/acp-13-011-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/621226cfe110/acp-13-011-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/48c867ca027f/acp-13-011-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/2c7fdd3fd7b7/acp-13-011-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/ab47d7fb70b3/acp-13-011-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/23056038f35e/acp-13-011-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/9a18ed70408f/acp-13-011-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/442d407d50ee/acp-13-011-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/dc92b8adad71/acp-13-011-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/716d8e4040c0/acp-13-011-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/48207fbe0261/acp-13-011-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/5eab2cea5f3b/acp-13-011-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7a7/5404470/621226cfe110/acp-13-011-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Resolving Conflicts Between Syntax and Plausibility in Sentence Comprehension.解决句子理解中句法与合理性之间的冲突
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):11-27. doi: 10.5709/acp-0203-8. eCollection 2017.
2
Multiple Solutions to the Same Problem: Utilization of Plausibility and Syntax in Sentence Comprehension by Older Adults with Impaired Hearing.同一问题的多种解决方案:听力受损老年人在句子理解中对合理性和句法的运用
Front Psychol. 2016 May 30;7:789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00789. eCollection 2016.
3
The Principle of Least Effort and Comprehension of Spoken Sentences by Younger and Older Adults.最小努力原则与年轻人和年长者对口语句子的理解
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:629464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629464. eCollection 2021.
4
Age differences in the recruitment of syntactic analysis and semantic plausibility during sentence comprehension.句子理解过程中句法分析和语义合理性的招募在年龄上的差异。
J Gen Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;151(4):444-466. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2023.2283107. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
5
Semantic Working Memory Predicts Sentence Comprehension Performance: A Case Series Approach.语义工作记忆预测句子理解能力:一项病例系列研究方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:887586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887586. eCollection 2022.
6
Is beta in agreement with the relatives? Using relative clause sentences to investigate MEG beta power dynamics during sentence comprehension.β与亲属意见一致吗?使用关系从句来研究句子理解过程中的脑磁图β功率动态。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Oct;60(10):e14332. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14332. Epub 2023 May 18.
7
Resolving syntactic-semantic conflicts: comprehension and processing patterns by deaf Chinese readers.解决句法-语义冲突:聋人汉语读者的理解和加工模式。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Jun 24;29(3):396-411. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enae008.
8
The Two Sides of Sensory-Cognitive Interactions: Effects of Age, Hearing Acuity, and Working Memory Span on Sentence Comprehension.感觉-认知交互的两个方面:年龄、听力敏锐度和工作记忆广度对句子理解的影响
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 29;7:236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00236. eCollection 2016.
9
How do people interpret implausible sentences?人们如何解读难以置信的句子?
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105101. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105101. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.句子理解过程中句法与语义的相互作用:句法和语义违反相结合的事件相关电位效应
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Memory Perspective on the Sentence Comprehension Deficits of School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Theory, Assessment, and Intervention.关于发育性语言障碍学龄儿童句子理解缺陷的新记忆视角:对理论、评估和干预的启示
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Apr 20;52(2):449-466. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00128. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
2
Cognitive predictors of sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder: Implications for assessment and treatment.有和没有发育性语言障碍的儿童句子理解的认知预测因素:对评估和治疗的启示
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Jun;21(3):240-251. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1559883. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Parsing.解析。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;2(4):353-364. doi: 10.1002/wcs.112. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
2
Genetic basis of a cognitive complexity metric.一种认知复杂性度量的遗传基础。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 10;10(4):e0123886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123886. eCollection 2015.
3
Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.句法剖析的趋势:预期、贝叶斯估计与适度剖析
Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.
认知加工与句法句子理解在有和无语言发育障碍儿童之间的结构关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):2950-2976. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0421.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov;18(11):605-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
4
Effects of animacy on processing relative clauses in older and younger adults.生命性对老年人和年轻人加工关系从句的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(3):487-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.956766. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning: an event-related potential study of belief bias.推理中的启发式与分析式过程:信念偏差的事件相关电位研究
Psychophysiology. 2014 Mar;51(3):290-7. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12169.
6
The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses.俄语关系从句的句法复杂性。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Nov 1;69(4):461-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.005.
7
Verbal learning and memory following stroke.中风后的言语学习与记忆
Brain Inj. 2014;28(4):442-7. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.888758. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
8
Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.工作记忆与语言理解:一项元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):422-33. doi: 10.3758/BF03214546.
9
Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation.合理整合句子解释中的嘈杂证据和先验语义期望。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):8051-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216438110. Epub 2013 May 1.
10
The influence of activation level on belief bias in relational reasoning.激活水平对关系推理中信念偏差的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;37(3):544-77. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12017. Epub 2013 Jan 7.