Dikmans Rieky E G, Nene Lauren E H, Bouman Mark-Bram, de Vet Henrica C W, Mureau Marc A M, Buncamper Marlon E, Winters Hay A H, Ritt Marco J P F, Mullender Margriet G
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical University Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Mar 1;5(3):e1254. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001254. eCollection 2017 Mar.
Valid tools to assess aesthetic outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery are scarce. Previously a professional aesthetic assessment scale was introduced, the Aesthetic Items Scale (AIS). We aim to determine if this method is a valid and reliable tool to assess aesthetic outcome after breast reconstructive surgery.
The study population was consenting women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy with subsequent implant-based breast reconstruction. The aesthetic outcome with regard to breast volume, shape, symmetry, scars, and nipple areola complex was rated on a 5-point scale using standardized photographs to give a summed total score. Photographs were evaluated by the patient, 5 plastic surgeons, and 3 mammography nurses. An overall rating of aesthetic outcome on a 1-10 scale was given separately. We determined the intraclass correlation coefficient and assessed interobserver agreement. To assess validity, we calculated the correlation between total score and overall rating of aesthetic outcome.
Interobserver reliability was highest between plastic surgeons for the subitem and overall scores and ranged between 0.56 and 0.82. The summed score of the AIS correlates strongly with the overall rating in professionals but not in patients.
The AIS is a valid and reliable method for evaluating aesthetic outcome of breast reconstruction by plastic surgeons. The results indicate that patients judge aesthetic outcome differently, taking into account factors that are not represented in the AIS. Professionals can use this method to evaluate surgical results, but other measurements are needed to map satisfaction of the patient with her breasts.
用于评估乳房重建手术后美学效果的有效工具稀缺。此前引入了一种专业美学评估量表,即美学项目量表(AIS)。我们旨在确定该方法是否是评估乳房重建手术后美学效果的有效且可靠的工具。
研究对象为同意接受预防性乳房切除并随后进行植入式乳房重建的女性。使用标准化照片,对乳房体积、形状、对称性、疤痕和乳头乳晕复合体的美学效果进行5分制评分,得出总分。照片由患者、5名整形外科医生和3名乳腺摄影护士进行评估。分别给出1至10分的美学效果总体评分。我们确定了组内相关系数并评估了观察者间的一致性。为评估有效性,我们计算了总分与美学效果总体评分之间的相关性。
整形外科医生之间在子项目和总分方面的观察者间可靠性最高,范围在0.56至0.82之间。AIS的总分与专业人员的总体评分密切相关,但与患者的总体评分无关。
AIS是整形外科医生评估乳房重建美学效果的有效且可靠的方法。结果表明,患者对美学效果的判断不同,会考虑AIS中未体现的因素。专业人员可以使用此方法评估手术结果,但需要其他测量方法来了解患者对其乳房的满意度。