Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway.
Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;183:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Romania has Europe's highest incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. While a free national cervical cancer-screening programme has been in operation since 2012, participation in the programme is low, particularly in minority populations. The aim of this study was to explore Roma women's (non)participation in the programme from women's own perspectives and those of healthcare providers and policy makers. We carried out fieldwork for a period of 125 days in 2015/16 involving 144 study participants in Cluj and Bucharest counties. Fieldwork entailed participant observation, qualitative interviewing and focus group discussions. A striking finding was that screening providers and Roma women had highly different takes on the national screening programme. We identified four fundamental questions about which there was considerable disagreement between them: whether a free national screening programme existed in the first place, whether Roma women were meant to be included in the programme if it did, whether Roma women wanted to take part in screening, and to what degree screening participation would really benefit women's health. On the background of insights from actor-network theory, the article discusses to what degree the programme could be said to speak to the interest of its intended Roma public, and considers the controversies in light of the literature on patient centred care and user involvement in health care. The paper contributes to the understanding of the health and health-related circumstances of the largest minority in Europe. It also problematizes the use of the concept of "barriers" in research into participation in cancer screening, and exemplifies how user involvement can potentially help transform and improve screening programmes.
罗马尼亚的宫颈癌发病率和死亡率居欧洲之首。虽然自 2012 年以来,该国一直在实施一项免费的全国性宫颈癌筛查计划,但参与率却很低,尤其是在少数民族群体中。本研究旨在从女性自身的角度以及医疗保健提供者和政策制定者的角度探讨罗姆女性(不)参与该计划的原因。我们在 2015/16 年期间进行了为期 125 天的实地工作,在克卢日和布加勒斯特县的 144 名研究参与者中进行了实地工作。实地工作包括参与观察、定性访谈和焦点小组讨论。一个引人注目的发现是,筛查提供者和罗姆女性对国家筛查计划的看法截然不同。我们确定了四个基本问题,在这些问题上,她们之间存在相当大的分歧:首先,是否存在一个免费的国家筛查计划;如果有,罗姆女性是否应该被纳入该计划;罗姆女性是否愿意参加筛查;以及筛查参与度在多大程度上真正有益于女性的健康。在行动者网络理论的观点背景下,本文讨论了该计划在多大程度上可以说是为其罗姆人目标受众的利益服务的,并考虑到了文献中关于以患者为中心的护理和医疗保健中用户参与的争议。本文有助于理解欧洲最大少数民族的健康和与健康相关的情况。它还对在癌症筛查参与研究中使用“障碍”概念提出了质疑,并举例说明了用户参与如何有可能帮助改变和改善筛查计划。