• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弱势女性进行宫颈癌筛查的障碍有哪些?来自七个欧洲国家利益相关者观点的定性比较分析。

What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries.

机构信息

University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark

CIC-P INSERM 1432, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 17;14(5):e079921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921
PMID:38760040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11103196/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to map and compare stakeholders' perceptions of barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women in seven European countries.

DESIGN

In Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to participate to identify barriers towards participation in cervical cancer screening.

SETTING

The study is nested in the European Union-funded project CBIG-SCREEN which aims to tackle inequity in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants represented micro-level stakeholders covering representatives of users, that is, vulnerable women, meso-level stakeholders covering healthcare professionals and social workers, and macro-level stakeholders covering programme managers and decision-makers.

METHODS

Across the seven countries, 25 meetings in Collaborative User Boards with a duration of 2 hours took place between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were video recorded or audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English for a qualitative framework analysis.

RESULTS

120 participants took part in the Collaborative User Boards. Context-specific barriers were related to different healthcare systems and characteristics of vulnerable populations. In Romania and Bulgaria, the lack of a continuous screening effort and lack of ways to identify eligible women were identified as barriers for all women rather than being specific for women in vulnerable situations. The participants in Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal identified providers' lack of cultural and social sensitivity towards vulnerable women as barriers. In all countries, vulnerable women's fear, shame and lack of priority to preventive healthcare were identified as psychological barriers.

CONCLUSION

The study provides an overview of stakeholders' perceived barriers towards vulnerable women's cervical cancer screening participation in seven European countries. The organisation of healthcare systems and the maturity of screening programmes differ between countries, while vulnerable women's psychological barriers had several similarities.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在绘制和比较七个欧洲国家中弱势女性宫颈癌筛查障碍的利益相关者认知。

设计

在协作用户委员会中,邀请利益相关者参与确定参与宫颈癌筛查的障碍。

背景

该研究嵌套在欧盟资助的项目 CBIG-SCREEN 中,该项目旨在解决弱势女性宫颈癌筛查中的不公平问题(www.cbig-screen.eu)。数据收集在保加利亚、丹麦、爱沙尼亚、法国、意大利、葡萄牙和罗马尼亚进行。

参与者

参与者代表微观层面的利益相关者,涵盖用户代表,即弱势女性,中观层面的利益相关者涵盖医疗保健专业人员和社会工作者,以及宏观层面的利益相关者涵盖项目管理人员和决策者。

方法

在七个国家中,2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 6 月期间,举行了 25 次协作用户委员会会议,每次会议持续 2 小时。会议进行了视频或音频录制,并翻译成英文进行定性框架分析。

结果

120 名参与者参加了协作用户委员会。与不同医疗保健系统和弱势人群特征相关的特定于情境的障碍被确定为所有女性而不是弱势处境女性的障碍。罗马尼亚和保加利亚认为缺乏持续的筛查努力和识别符合条件的女性的方法是对所有女性的障碍,而不是对弱势处境女性的特定障碍。丹麦、爱沙尼亚、法国、意大利和葡萄牙的参与者认为提供者对弱势女性缺乏文化和社会敏感性是障碍。在所有国家,弱势女性对预防性医疗保健的恐惧、羞耻和缺乏优先级被确定为心理障碍。

结论

本研究提供了对七个欧洲国家弱势女性宫颈癌筛查参与障碍的利益相关者认知的概述。国家之间的医疗保健系统组织和筛查计划的成熟度存在差异,而弱势女性的心理障碍有几个相似之处。

相似文献

1
What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries.弱势女性进行宫颈癌筛查的障碍有哪些?来自七个欧洲国家利益相关者观点的定性比较分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 17;14(5):e079921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921.
2
How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries.宫颈筛查如何满足弱势女性的需求?一项来自七个欧洲国家利益相关者视角的定性比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e090631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090631.
3
Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women in Europe: a scoping review.与欧洲移民妇女宫颈癌筛查参与相关的因素:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 11;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01275-4.
4
Controversies about cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of Roma women's (non)participation in cervical cancer screening in Romania.关于宫颈癌筛查的争议:罗马尼亚罗姆妇女(不)参与宫颈癌筛查的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;183:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
5
"Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough". Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon-a qualitative study using focus groups."宫颈癌筛查:仅有意识是不够的"。了解喀麦隆西部妇女筛查障碍的定性研究:使用焦点小组。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01186-9.
6
Experiences of a group of indigenous women from the Colombian Amazon with cervical cancer prevention screening. Qualitative study in the context of participatory research to reduce inequalities.一组来自哥伦比亚亚马逊地区的土著妇女在宫颈癌预防筛查方面的经验。这是一项在参与式研究背景下开展的减少不平等现象的定性研究。
Ethn Health. 2024 Nov;29(8):893-907. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2024.2387112. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
8
Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among under- and neverscreened women in Flanders, Belgium - a qualitative study on community and healthcare providers' perspectives.比利时佛兰德斯地区未接受和未定期接受宫颈癌筛查妇女的筛查障碍和促进因素 - 基于社区和医疗保健提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):2870. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20166-9.
9
Barriers and facilitators of retention in care after cervical cancer screening: patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives.宫颈癌筛查后保持治疗的障碍和促进因素:患者和医疗服务提供者的观点。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 14;24(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03343-1.
10
Stakeholders' perspectives on facilitators of and barriers to the utilisation of and access to maternal health services in Eritrea: a qualitative study.利益相关者对厄立特里亚利用和获得孕产妇保健服务的促进因素和障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 19;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1665-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerating HPV-related cancer elimination - a meeting report.加速消除与人类乳头瘤病毒相关的癌症——会议报告
BMC Proc. 2025 Aug 29;19(Suppl 19):22. doi: 10.1186/s12919-025-00337-1.
2
Patient experience and shared decision-making in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.人乳头瘤病毒阳性口咽癌患者的体验与共同决策:定性和定量证据的系统评价
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;55:101028. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101028. eCollection 2025 Nov.
3
Mortality of Three Major Gynecological Cancers in the European Region: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis from 1992 to 2021 and Predictions in a 25‑Year Period.欧洲地区三大妇科癌症的死亡率:1992年至2021年的年龄-时期-队列分析及25年期间的预测
Ann Glob Health. 2025 Jun 10;91(1):30. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4688. eCollection 2025.
4
Accuracy of real-time PCR assays for human papillomavirus using urine samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用尿液样本的人乳头瘤病毒实时聚合酶链反应检测的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0135224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01352-24. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
5
How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries.宫颈筛查如何满足弱势女性的需求?一项来自七个欧洲国家利益相关者视角的定性比较研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e090631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090631.
6
Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening with 7-Type HPV mRNA E6/E7 Testing on Self-Collected Samples: Multicentric Insights from Mexico.利用7型人乳头瘤病毒mRNA E6/E7检测对自我采集样本进行宫颈癌筛查:来自墨西哥的多中心见解
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;16(13):2485. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132485.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing the participation of groups identified as underserved in cervical cancer screening in Europe: a scoping review of the literature.影响欧洲被认定为服务不足群体参与宫颈癌筛查的因素:文献的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 25;11:1144674. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144674. eCollection 2023.
2
Survey of current policies towards widening cervical screening coverage among vulnerable women in 22 European countries.22 个欧洲国家中针对弱势女性扩大子宫颈筛查覆盖范围的现行政策调查。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;33(3):502-508. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad055.
3
Barriers to Breast Cancer-Screening Adherence in Vulnerable Populations.弱势群体乳腺癌筛查依从性的障碍
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;15(3):604. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030604.
4
Exploring Preventive Healthcare in a High-Risk Vulnerable Population.探讨高危脆弱人群的预防保健。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4502. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084502.
5
Understanding Cervical Cancer Screening Barriers among Migrant Women: A Qualitative Study with Healthcare and Community Workers in Portugal.理解移民妇女宫颈癌筛查障碍:葡萄牙医疗保健和社区工作者的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;18(14):7248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147248.
6
Experiences of cervical screening participation and non-participation in women from minority ethnic populations in Scotland.苏格兰少数族裔女性参与和不参与宫颈癌筛查的体验。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1459-1472. doi: 10.1111/hex.13287. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Perceptions of cervical cancer prevention among a group of ethnic minority women in Denmark-A qualitative study.丹麦一个少数民族妇女群体对宫颈癌预防的认知:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0250816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250816. eCollection 2021.
8
Knowledge and experience of cancer prevention and screening among Gypsies, Roma and Travellers: a participatory qualitative study.吉普赛人、罗姆人和旅行者对癌症预防与筛查的知识及经验:一项参与性定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 16;21(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10390-y.
9
Decision-making, barriers, and facilitators regarding cervical cancer screening participation among Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands: a focus group study.荷兰土耳其和摩洛哥女性参与宫颈癌筛查的决策、障碍和促进因素:一项焦点小组研究。
Ethn Health. 2022 Jul;27(5):1147-1165. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2020.1863921. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
10
Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Screening among Migrant Women of African Origin: A Qualitative Study in Finland.非洲裔移民女性宫颈癌筛查障碍及促进因素:芬兰定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 14;17(20):7473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207473.