Clegg T A, Good M, Doyle M, Duignan A, More S J, Gormley E
Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare St., Dublin 2, Ireland.
Prev Vet Med. 2017 May 1;140:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
There are two different contexts in the Irish bTB eradication programme in which the interferon-gamma assay (IFN-γ) is applied. Firstly, the IFN-γ assay is applied routinely to high risk cohorts in herds with four or more reactors to the SICTT. The IFN-γ test is then carried out on blood samples submitted to the laboratory within 8h of collection (diagnostic testing). Secondly, the use of the IFN-γ assay has recently been extended to test SICTT reactors as part of a general quality assurance (QA) scheme to monitor the performance of the SICTT. Blood samples from reactors are tested one day after blood collection (QA testing). In this study, we analysed the relative performance of the SICTT and IFN-γ when used in parallel as an 8h diagnostic test and as a 24h QA test on SICTT reactors. A total of 17,725 IFN-γ tests were included in the analysis (11,658 diagnostic tests and 6067 QA tests). Of the samples submitted for diagnostic testing, the proportion positive to IFN-γ decreased with the severity of interpretation of the SICTT result. Of the standard reactors that were tested with IFN-γ in the QA programme, 92.2% were positive to the IFN-γ test. Among animals that were SICTT -ve/IFN-γ +ve, 18.9% were positive at post-mortem compared to 11.8% of those that were SICTT +ve (standard reactor)/IFN-γ -ve. These results highlight the risk associated with retaining SICTT -ve/IFN-γ +ve animals, and suggest that prompt removal of these animals is necessary to reduce the potential for future transmission.
在爱尔兰牛结核病根除计划中有两种不同的情况会应用干扰素-γ检测(IFN-γ)。首先,IFN-γ检测常规应用于对单一皮内比较结核菌素试验(SICTT)有四个或更多反应动物的牛群中的高风险群体。然后在采集后8小时内将血样送到实验室进行IFN-γ检测(诊断检测)。其次,IFN-γ检测的应用最近已扩展到对SICTT反应动物进行检测,作为监测SICTT性能的一般质量保证(QA)计划的一部分。反应动物的血样在采血后一天进行检测(QA检测)。在本研究中,我们分析了SICTT和IFN-γ在并行用作对SICTT反应动物的8小时诊断检测和24小时QA检测时的相对性能。分析共纳入了17725次IFN-γ检测(11658次诊断检测和6067次QA检测)。在提交用于诊断检测的样本中,IFN-γ阳性比例随SICTT结果判读的严重程度而降低。在QA计划中用IFN-γ检测的标准反应动物中,92.2%对IFN-γ检测呈阳性。在SICTT阴性/IFN-γ阳性的动物中,18.9%在死后检测呈阳性,而SICTT阳性(标准反应动物)/IFN-γ阴性的动物中这一比例为11.8%。这些结果突出了保留SICTT阴性/IFN-γ阳性动物所带来的风险,并表明迅速清除这些动物对于降低未来传播的可能性是必要的。