Cha Dong Ik, Lee Min Woo, Kang Tae Wook, Oh Young-Taek, Jeong Ja-Yeon, Chang Jung-Woo, Ryu Jiwon, Lee Kyong Joon, Kim Jaeil, Bang Won-Chul, Shin Dong Kuk, Choi Sung Jin, Koh Dalkwon, Kim Kyunga
Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Medical Imaging R&D Group, Health & Medical Equipment Business, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Oct;40(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1666-5. Epub 2017 May 1.
To identify the more accurate reference data sets for fusion imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation or biopsy of hepatic lesions between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images.
This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was received from all patients. Twelve consecutive patients who were referred to assess the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation or biopsy were enrolled. Automatic registration using CT and MR images was performed in each patient. Registration errors during optimal and opposite respiratory phases, time required for image fusion and number of point locks used were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
The registration errors during optimal respiratory phase were not significantly different between image fusion using CT and MR images as reference data sets (p = 0.969). During opposite respiratory phase, the registration error was smaller with MR images than CT (p = 0.028). The time and the number of points locks needed for complete image fusion were not significantly different between CT and MR images (p = 0.328 and p = 0.317, respectively).
MR images would be more suitable as the reference data set for fusion imaging-guided procedures of focal hepatic lesions than CT images.
确定在计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振(MR)图像之间,用于肝脏病变融合成像引导下射频消融或活检的更准确参考数据集。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准,并获得所有患者的书面知情同意。纳入连续12例被转诊以评估射频消融或活检可行性的患者。对每位患者进行CT和MR图像的自动配准。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较最佳呼吸期和相反呼吸期的配准误差、图像融合所需时间以及使用的点锁定数量。
以CT和MR图像作为参考数据集进行图像融合时,最佳呼吸期的配准误差无显著差异(p = 0.969)。在相反呼吸期,MR图像的配准误差小于CT(p = 0.028)。CT和MR图像之间完全图像融合所需的时间和点锁定数量无显著差异(分别为p = 0.328和p = 0.317)。
对于肝脏局灶性病变的融合成像引导操作,MR图像作为参考数据集比CT图像更合适。